8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Validación del instrumento de vocación de servicio al cuidado humano en estudiantes de enfermería Translated title: Validation of the instrument of vocation of service to human care in Nursing students

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Resumen Objetivo: Diseñar y validar un instrumento que mida el nivel de vocación de servicio al cuidado humano de los estudiantes de enfermería mexicanos. Metodología: Diseño transversal de validación de instrumento. Cuatro etapas: (1) Diseño y validación del instrumento por técnica de jueces, (2) Prueba piloto, (3) Versión final y comparación test/re-test, (4) Análisis factorial. La muestra fueron 355 estudiantes de enfermería. Resultados: Se diseñó un instrumento con 23 ítems distribuidos en tres dimensiones, con respuesta Likert. Según la validación por jueces, el instrumento se consideró favorable. Se comprendieron todos los reactivos, el tiempo de llenado fluctuó de 12 a 23 minutos. Se obtuvo una confiabilidad de .818, el CCI fue significativo (p=.001). El instrumento explica el 64.1 % de la vocación. Conclusión: el instrumento es válido y fiable para medir el nivel de vocación en estudiantes de licenciatura en enfermería.

          Translated abstract

          Abstract Objective: To design and validate an instrument that measures the level of vocation of service to human care of Mexican nursing students. Methodology: Cross-sectional design of instrument validation. Four stages: (1) Design and validation of the instrument by technique of judges, (2) Pilot test, (3) Final version and test / re-test comparison, (4) Factor analysis. The sample was 355 nursing students. Results: An instrument was designed with 23 items distributed in three dimensions, with a Likert response. According to the validation by judges, the instrument was considered favorable. All reagents were understood, fill time ranged from 12 to 23 minutes. A reliability of .818 was obtained, the ICC was significant (p = .001). The instrument explains 64.1 % of the vocation. Conclusion: the instrument is valid and reliable to measure the level of vocation in undergraduate nursing students.

          Related collections

          Most cited references20

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          ABC of Content Validation and Content Validity Index Calculation

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Implications for COVID-19: a systematic review of nurses’ experiences of working in acute care hospital settings during a respiratory pandemic

            Background Pandemics and epidemics are a public health emergencies that can result in substantial deaths and socio-economic disruption. Nurses play a key role in the public health response to such crises, delivering direct patient care and risk of exposure to the infectious disease. The experience of providing nursing care in this context has the potential to have significant short and long term consequences for individuals, society and the nursing profession. Objectives To synthesize and present the best available evidence on the experiences of nurses working in acute hospital settings during a pandemic. Design This review was conducted using the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for systematic reviews. Data sources A structured search using CINAHL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, Google Scholar, Cochrane Library, MedNar, ProQuest and Index to Theses was conducted. Review methods All studies describing nurses’ experiences were included regardless of methodology. Themes and narrative statements were extracted from included papers using the SUMARI data extraction tool from Joanna Briggs Institute. Results Thirteen qualitative studies were included in the review. The experiences of 348 nurses generated a total of 116 findings, which formed seven categories based on similarity of meaning. Three synthesized findings were generated from the categories: (i) Supportive nursing teams providing quality care; (ii) Acknowledging the physical and emotional impact; and (iii) Responsiveness of systematised organizational reaction. Conclusions Nurses are pivotal to the health care response to infectious disease pandemics and epidemics. This systematic review emphasises that nurses’ require Governments, policy makers and nursing groups to actively engage in supporting nurses, both during and following a pandemic or epidemic. Without this, nurses are likely to experience substantial psychological issues that can lead to burnout and loss from the nursing workforce.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Validez de contenido por juicio de expertos: propuesta de una herramienta virtual

              RESUMEN: El estudio describe las ventajas de utilizar una herramienta virtual diseñada para validar el contenido de instrumentos de investigación, a través de la técnica del juicio de expertos, y se presenta los resultados de una encuesta aplicada a expertos que participaron como jueces en la validación de contenido y expusieron su opinión y experiencias en los procesos de validación de instrumentos. El diseño metodológico incluyó tres fases: la primera, relacionada con el diseño de la herramienta virtual; posteriormente, se llevó a cabo la aplicación de esta herramienta mediante un ejercicio real y con el propósito de validar un cuestionario; en la última fase se analizaron los resultados de los siete jueces participantes. Los hallazgos muestran que el uso de la herramienta virtual facilita la organización de la información en ítems por dimensión, así como el registro de la opinión de los jueces por las categorías de claridad, coherencia, relevancia y suficiencia.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                index
                Index de Enfermería
                Index Enferm
                Fundación Index (Granada, Granada, Spain )
                1132-1296
                1699-5988
                September 2021
                : 30
                : 3
                : 254-258
                Affiliations
                [3] Puebla orgnameUniversidad de las Américas Puebla México
                [2] Madrid orgnameHospital Ruber Internacional España
                [1] Puebla orgnameBenemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla orgdiv1Facultad de Enfermería Mexico
                Article
                S1132-12962021000200021 S1132-1296(21)03000300021
                91adbf4a-ed3d-4d0e-a266-b3bae5ed3a85

                This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

                History
                : 20 May 2021
                : 17 March 2021
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 20, Pages: 5
                Product

                SciELO Spain

                Categories
                Academia

                Validity,Validez,Confiabilidad,Aptitud,Enfermería,Reliability,Fitness,Nursing

                Comments

                Comment on this article