18
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Plant Taxonomic Diversity Better Explains Soil Fungal and Bacterial Diversity than Functional Diversity in Restored Forest Ecosystems

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Plant attributes have direct and indirect effects on soil microbes via plant inputs and plant-mediated soil changes. However, whether plant taxonomic and functional diversities can explain the soil microbial diversity of restored forest ecosystems remains elusive. Here, we tested the linkage between plant attributes and soil microbial communities in four restored forests ( Acacia species, Eucalyptus species, mixed coniferous species, mixed native species). The trait-based approaches were applied for plant properties and high-throughput Illumina sequencing was applied for fungal and bacterial diversity. The total number of soil microbial operational taxonomic units (OTUs) varied among the four forests. The highest richness of fungal OTUs was found in the Acacia forest. However, bacterial OTUs were highest in the Eucalyptus forest. Species richness was positively and significantly related to fungal and bacterial richness. Plant taxonomic diversity (species richness and species diversity) explained more of the soil microbial diversity than the functional diversity and soil properties. Prediction of fungal richness was better than that of bacterial richness. In addition, root traits explained more variation than the leaf traits. Overall, plant taxonomic diversity played a more important role than plant functional diversity and soil properties in shaping the soil microbial diversity of the four forests.

          Related collections

          Most cited references50

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Benefits of plant diversity to ecosystems: immediate, filter and founder effects

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Functional diversity: back to basics and looking forward.

            Functional diversity is a component of biodiversity that generally concerns the range of things that organisms do in communities and ecosystems. Here, we review how functional diversity can explain and predict the impact of organisms on ecosystems and thereby provide a mechanistic link between the two. Critical points in developing predictive measures of functional diversity are the choice of functional traits with which organisms are distinguished, how the diversity of that trait information is summarized into a measure of functional diversity, and that the measures of functional diversity are validated through quantitative analyses and experimental tests. There is a vast amount of trait information available for plant species and a substantial amount for animals. Choosing which traits to include in a particular measure of functional diversity will depend on the specific aims of a particular study. Quantitative methods for choosing traits and for assigning weighting to traits are being developed, but need much more work before we can be confident about trait choice. The number of ways of measuring functional diversity is growing rapidly. We divide them into four main groups. The first, the number of functional groups or types, has significant problems and researchers are more frequently using measures that do not require species to be grouped. Of these, some measure diversity by summarizing distances between species in trait space, some by estimating the size of the dendrogram required to describe the difference, and some include information about species' abundances. We show some new and important differences between these, as well as what they indicate about the responses of assemblages to loss of individuals. There is good experimental and analytical evidence that functional diversity can provide a link between organisms and ecosystems but greater validation of measures is required. We suggest that non-significant results have a range of alternate explanations that do not necessarily contradict positive effects of functional diversity. Finally, we suggest areas for development of techniques used to measure functional diversity, highlight some exciting questions that are being addressed using ideas about functional diversity, and suggest some directions for novel research.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Diversity and productivity in a long-term grassland experiment.

              Plant diversity and niche complementarity had progressively stronger effects on ecosystem functioning during a 7-year experiment, with 16-species plots attaining 2.7 times greater biomass than monocultures. Diversity effects were neither transients nor explained solely by a few productive or unviable species. Rather, many higher-diversity plots outperformed the best monoculture. These results help resolve debate over biodiversity and ecosystem functioning, show effects at higher than expected diversity levels, and demonstrate, for these ecosystems, that even the best-chosen monocultures cannot achieve greater productivity or carbon stores than higher-diversity sites.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Plants (Basel)
                Plants (Basel)
                plants
                Plants
                MDPI
                2223-7747
                06 November 2019
                November 2019
                : 8
                : 11
                : 479
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Key Laboratory of Vegetation Restoration and Management of Degraded Ecosystem, South China Botanical Garden (SCBG), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510650, China guozhiming_ecology@ 123456163.com (Z.G.); danhe@ 123456scbg.ac.cn (D.H.); yuqingshui@ 123456pku.edu.cn (Q.Y.); rxq99@ 123456scbg.ac.cn (X.R.); spliu@ 123456scbg.ac.cn (S.L.); tanxp@ 123456scbg.ac.cn (X.T.)
                [2 ]University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100000, China
                [3 ]Department of Agroforestry and Environment, Hajee Mohammad Danesh Science and Technology University, Dinajpur-5200, Bangladesh
                [4 ]Institute of Fruit Tree Research, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou 510640, China; monirbge@ 123456gmail.com
                Author notes
                [* ]Correspondence: shenweij@ 123456scbg.ac.cn ; Tel.: +86-203-7252-950
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1541-5650
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3329-1815
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0425-947X
                Article
                plants-08-00479
                10.3390/plants8110479
                6918236
                31698841
                91b6bc52-8986-499c-9ff1-d8df9500c75a
                © 2019 by the authors.

                Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 03 October 2019
                : 04 November 2019
                Categories
                Article

                plant-soil feedback,soil bacterial community,soil fungal community,taxonomic diversity,plant functional traits,16s sequencing

                Comments

                Comment on this article