+1 Recommend
1 collections
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      The Day of the Dipslide


      S. Karger AG

      Read this article at

          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.


          The laboratory diagnosis of urinary tract infection is described in detail. This is now a quantitative bacteriological exercise demanding reliable and accurate methods. There is a need for a cheap, simpls and convenient system and developments in this direction have culminated in the plane dipslide. This is the only apparatus which fulfils all necessary criteria. As with all other methods, it is at the mercy of the quality of the specimens but only the dipslide combines the accuracy of the pour-plate method with ease of transport. The clinician at the bedside is now able to perform a satisfactory bacterial count thus avoiding the transport delay which allows contamination to mask or mimic true infection. The plane dipslide is superior to semi-quantitative methods such as the standard loop or the dipspoon and gives results comparable in accuracy with the pour-plate method. In addition, it provides bacterial colonies suitable for further laboratory examination. We recommend that the plane dipslide is adopted as the method of choice for bacterial counting within laboratories. In clinical practice it is ideal for use in acute symptomatic cases, the follow-up of chronic bacteriurics and also in screening programmes. We conclude that the plane dipslide is a major advance in the field of urinary tract infection and make a plea for its free availability to general practitioners as well as the hospital service.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          S. Karger AG
          28 November 2008
          : 11
          : 2-4
          : 123-133
          Royal Hospital for Sick Children and The Queen Mother’s Hospital, Glasgow
          180225 Nephron 1973;11:123–133
          © 1973 S. Karger AG, Basel

          Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug. Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

          Page count
          Pages: 11

          Cardiovascular Medicine, Nephrology


          Comment on this article