13
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Domestication and large animal interactions: Skeletal trauma in northern Vietnam during the hunter-gatherer Da But period

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The aim of this paper is to test the hypothesis that healed traumatic injuries in the pre-Neolithic assemblage of Con Co Ngua, northern Vietnam ( c. 6800–6200 cal BP) are consistent with large wild animal interactions prior to their domestication. The core sample included 110 adult (aged ≥ 18 years) individuals, while comparisons are made with an additional six skeletal series from Neolithic through to Iron Age Vietnam, Thailand, and Mongolia. All post cranial skeletal elements were assessed for signs of healed trauma and identified cases were further x-rayed. Crude trauma prevalence (14/110, 12.7%) was not significantly different between males (8/52) and females (5/37) (χ 2 = 0.061, p = 0.805). Nor were there significant differences in the prevalence of fractured limbs, although males displayed greater rates of lower limb bone trauma than females. Further, distinct from females, half the injured males suffered vertebral fractures, consistent with high-energy trauma. The first hypothesis is supported, while some support for the sexual divisions of labour was found. The prevalence and pattern of fractured limbs at CCN when compared with other Southeast and East Asian sites is most similar to the agropastoral site of Lamadong, China. The potential for skeletal trauma to assess animal trapping and herding practices prior to domestication in the past is discussed.

          Related collections

          Most cited references65

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          A meta-analysis of previous fracture and subsequent fracture risk.

          Previous fracture is a well-documented risk factor for future fracture. The aim of this study was to quantify this risk on an international basis and to explore the relationship of this risk with age, sex, and bone mineral density (BMD). We studied 15259 men and 44902 women from 11 cohorts comprising EVOS/EPOS, OFELY, CaMos, Rochester, Sheffield, Rotterdam, Kuopio, DOES, Hiroshima, and two cohorts from Gothenburg. Cohorts were followed for a total of 250000 person-years. The effect of a prior history of fracture on the risk of any fracture, any osteoporotic fracture, and hip fracture alone was examined using a Poisson model for each sex from each cohort. Covariates examined were age, sex, and BMD. The results of the different studies were merged by using the weighted beta-coefficients. A previous fracture history was associated with a significantly increased risk of any fracture compared with individuals without a prior fracture (RR = 1.86; 95% CI = 1.75-1.98). The risk ratio was similar for the outcome of osteoporotic fracture or for hip fracture. There was no significant difference in risk ratio between men and women. Risk ratio (RR) was marginally downward adjusted when account was taken of BMD. Low BMD explained a minority of the risk for any fracture (8%) and for hip fracture (22%). The risk ratio was stable with age except in the case of hip fracture outcome where the risk ratio decreased significantly with age. We conclude that previous history of fracture confers an increased risk of fracture of substantial importance beyond that explained by measurement of BMD. Its validation on an international basis permits the use of this risk factor in case finding strategies.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            A newly developed visual method of sexing the os pubis.

            T Phenice (1969)
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The epidemiology of distal radius fractures.

              Distal radius fractures are one of the most common types of fractures. Although the pediatric and elderly populations are at greatest risk for this injury, distal radius fractures still have a significant impact on the health and well-being of young adults. Data from the past 40 years have documented a trend toward an overall increase in the prevalence of this injury in both the pediatric and elderly populations. Understanding the epidemiology of this fracture is an important step toward the improvement of treatment strategies and the development of preventive measures with which to target this debilitating injury. Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Formal analysisRole: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: VisualizationRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: ResourcesRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: InvestigationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: VisualizationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Funding acquisitionRole: Resources
                Role: ResourcesRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Funding acquisitionRole: Resources
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Funding acquisitionRole: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: Project administrationRole: ResourcesRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS ONE
                plos
                plosone
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
                1932-6203
                4 September 2019
                2019
                : 14
                : 9
                : e0218777
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Department of Anatomy, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
                [2 ] College of Medicine and Dentistry, James Cook University, Townsville, Australia
                [3 ] Department of Archaeology, Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History, Jena, Germany
                [4 ] Department of Prehistoric Archaeology, Vietnam Institute of Archaeology, Hanoi, Vietnam
                [5 ] College of Arts, Society and Education, James Cook University, Townsville, Australia
                [6 ] School of Health Science, Sapporo Medical University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
                [7 ] School of Archaeology and Anthropology, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
                Ohio State University, UNITED STATES
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4015-4296
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5091-3105
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0747-9099
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6027-8915
                Article
                PONE-D-18-16598
                10.1371/journal.pone.0218777
                6726200
                31483781
                9215b85a-6a9e-4341-8673-affa8990ebcc
                © 2019 Scott et al

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 3 June 2018
                : 11 June 2019
                Page count
                Figures: 6, Tables: 5, Pages: 24
                Funding
                Grant sponsors were: Australian Research Council DP110101097; FT 120100299 awarded to MO; Institute of Advanced Study (IAS), Durham University and the COFUND 'Durham International Fellowships for Research and Enterprise' scheme. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Critical Care and Emergency Medicine
                Trauma Medicine
                Traumatic Injury
                Bone Fracture
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Critical Care and Emergency Medicine
                Trauma Medicine
                Traumatic Injury
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Anatomy
                Musculoskeletal System
                Body Limbs
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Anatomy
                Musculoskeletal System
                Body Limbs
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Epidemiology
                Medical Risk Factors
                Traumatic Injury Risk Factors
                Falls
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Public and Occupational Health
                Traumatic Injury Risk Factors
                Falls
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Organisms
                Eukaryota
                Animals
                Animal Types
                Domestic Animals
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Zoology
                Animal Types
                Domestic Animals
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Critical Care and Emergency Medicine
                Trauma Medicine
                Traumatic Injury
                Musculoskeletal Injury
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Anatomy
                Bone
                Diaphyses
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Anatomy
                Bone
                Diaphyses
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Anatomy
                Biological Tissue
                Connective Tissue
                Bone
                Diaphyses
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Anatomy
                Biological Tissue
                Connective Tissue
                Bone
                Diaphyses
                Social Sciences
                Archaeology
                Custom metadata
                All relevant data are within the manuscript ( Table 2).

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article