26
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      OCT-Derived Plaque Morphology and FFR-Determined Hemodynamic Relevance in Intermediate Coronary Stenoses

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background: optical coherence tomography (OCT) might allow identifying lesion features reportedly associated with plaque vulnerability and increased risk of clinical events. Previous studies on correlation between OCT and functional lesion significance indices reported contradictory results, yet integration of complementary information from both modalities is gaining increased interest. The aim of the study was to compare plaque morphology using OCT in hemodynamically relevant vs. non-relevant lesions by fractional flow reserve (FFR). Methods: consecutive patients with intermediate grade coronary stenoses by angiography were evaluated by both FFR and OCT in this single-center study. Stenoses were labeled hemodynamically relevant in case of the FFR ≤ 0.80. Minimal lumen area (MLA), fibrous cap thickness (FCT), minimal cap thickness over the calcium, angle of the calcium, and necrotic core within the lesions were evaluated. Results: a total of 105 patients (124 vessels) were analyzed. Of them, 65 patients were identified with at least one lesion identified as hemodynamically relevant by FFR (72 vessels, 58.1%). Lesions with FFR ≤0.80 presented with lower mean and minimal lumen area (3.46 ± 1.29 vs. 4.65 ± 2.19, p =0.001 and 1.84 ± 0.97 vs. 2.66 ± 1.40, p = 0.001) compared to patients with FFR > 0.80. No differences were found between groups in the mean and minimal FCT, mean, and maximal necrotic core, calcium angle, as well as the overall rate of calcified and lipid plaques. Conclusion: hemodynamic relevance of intermediate grade lesions correlated moderately with the luminal assessment by OCT. No differences were identified in the plaque morphology between relevant and non-relevant coronary stenoses by FFR.

          Related collections

          Most cited references39

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          2018 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention.

            In patients with multivessel coronary artery disease who are undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), coronary angiography is the standard method for guiding the placement of the stent. It is unclear whether routine measurement of fractional flow reserve (FFR; the ratio of maximal blood flow in a stenotic artery to normal maximal flow), in addition to angiography, improves outcomes. In 20 medical centers in the United States and Europe, we randomly assigned 1005 patients with multivessel coronary artery disease to undergo PCI with implantation of drug-eluting stents guided by angiography alone or guided by FFR measurements in addition to angiography. Before randomization, lesions requiring PCI were identified on the basis of their angiographic appearance. Patients assigned to angiography-guided PCI underwent stenting of all indicated lesions, whereas those assigned to FFR-guided PCI underwent stenting of indicated lesions only if the FFR was 0.80 or less. The primary end point was the rate of death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and repeat revascularization at 1 year. The mean (+/-SD) number of indicated lesions per patient was 2.7+/-0.9 in the angiography group and 2.8+/-1.0 in the FFR group (P=0.34). The number of stents used per patient was 2.7+/-1.2 and 1.9+/-1.3, respectively (P<0.001). The 1-year event rate was 18.3% (91 patients) in the angiography group and 13.2% (67 patients) in the FFR group (P=0.02). Seventy-eight percent of the patients in the angiography group were free from angina at 1 year, as compared with 81% of patients in the FFR group (P=0.20). Routine measurement of FFR in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease who are undergoing PCI with drug-eluting stents significantly reduces the rate of the composite end point of death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and repeat revascularization at 1 year. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00267774.) 2009 Massachusetts Medical Society
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found
              Is Open Access

              Consensus standards for acquisition, measurement, and reporting of intravascular optical coherence tomography studies: a report from the International Working Group for Intravascular Optical Coherence Tomography Standardization and Validation.

              The purpose of this document is to make the output of the International Working Group for Intravascular Optical Coherence Tomography (IWG-IVOCT) Standardization and Validation available to medical and scientific communities, through a peer-reviewed publication, in the interest of improving the diagnosis and treatment of patients with atherosclerosis, including coronary artery disease. Intravascular optical coherence tomography (IVOCT) is a catheter-based modality that acquires images at a resolution of ~10 μm, enabling visualization of blood vessel wall microstructure in vivo at an unprecedented level of detail. IVOCT devices are now commercially available worldwide, there is an active user base, and the interest in using this technology is growing. Incorporation of IVOCT in research and daily clinical practice can be facilitated by the development of uniform terminology and consensus-based standards on use of the technology, interpretation of the images, and reporting of IVOCT results. The IWG-IVOCT, comprising more than 260 academic and industry members from Asia, Europe, and the United States, formed in 2008 and convened on the topic of IVOCT standardization through a series of 9 national and international meetings. Knowledge and recommendations from this group on key areas within the IVOCT field were assembled to generate this consensus document, authored by the Writing Committee, composed of academicians who have participated in meetings and/or writing of the text. This document may be broadly used as a standard reference regarding the current state of the IVOCT imaging modality, intended for researchers and clinicians who use IVOCT and analyze IVOCT data. Copyright © 2012 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Academic Editor
                Journal
                J Clin Med
                J Clin Med
                jcm
                Journal of Clinical Medicine
                MDPI
                2077-0383
                28 May 2021
                June 2021
                : 10
                : 11
                : 2379
                Affiliations
                [1 ]First Department of Cardiology, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-097 Warsaw, Poland; dorota.ochijewicz@ 123456gmail.com (D.O.); lukasz@ 123456koltowski.com (Ł.K.); ardzanek@ 123456poczta.wp.pl (A.R.); apietrasik@ 123456tlen.pl (A.P.); zaleskamartyna@ 123456gmail.com (M.Z.); jakub.maksym@ 123456gmail.com (J.M.); piotrbarus@ 123456op.pl (P.B.); krzysztof.filipiak@ 123456wum.edu.pl (K.J.F.); grzegorz.opolski@ 123456wum.edu.pl (G.O.); jkochman@ 123456wum.edu.pl (J.K.)
                [2 ]Krakow Cardiovascular Research Institute, 30-055 Krakow, Poland; jacek.jakala@ 123456kcri.org (J.J.); mslezak@ 123456kcri.org (M.S.); krzysztof.malinowski@ 123456doctoral.uj.edu.pl (K.P.M.); tomaszroleder@ 123456gmail.com (T.R.)
                [3 ]Regional Specialist Hospital, Research and Development Center, 51-124 Wroclaw, Poland
                Author notes
                [* ]Correspondence: mariusz.tomaniak@ 123456wum.edu.pl ; Tel.: +48-225-991-951
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8289-1393
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5212-6380
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2053-9946
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4744-2554
                Article
                jcm-10-02379
                10.3390/jcm10112379
                8197966
                34071299
                924454e6-3b65-4938-bdbb-0cdd63bb63be
                © 2021 by the authors.

                Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 05 April 2021
                : 21 May 2021
                Categories
                Article

                optical coherence tomography,fractional flow reserve,stable coronary artery disease

                Comments

                Comment on this article