For Publishers
DiscoveryMetadataPeer reviewHostingPublishing
For Researchers
JoinPublishReviewCollect
Register
Blog
About
Search
Advanced search
My ScienceOpen
Search
For Publishers
For Researchers
Blog
About
1
views
20
references
 Top references
cited by
0
    
0 reviews
 Review
0
comments
 Comment
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      439
      similar
       All similar
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Hormonal-Receptors-Positive and HER2-Negative Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer Treated with First-Line Palbociclib and Hormonal Therapy: Impact of First-Cycle Neutropenia and Dose Reduction on Therapeutic Outcome

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          CDK 4/6 inhibitors with hormonal therapy are the standard first-line therapy in metastatic hormonal receptors (HR)-positive and HER2-negative breast cancer. This study aims to assess the impact of neutropenia with 1st cycle, dose reduction, HER2-low status, and other clinicopathological factors on survival outcomes with the first-line palbociclib and hormonal therapy. Patients and Methods. In this retrospective study, we recruited patients with metastatic HR-positive and HER2-negative breast cancer. Neutropenia with 1st cycle, palbociclib dose reduction in addition to different clinicopathological and survival data were checked in patients' medical records. Survival outcomes were compared according to the abovementioned factors.

          Results

          We recruited 150 patients who received first-line palbociclib with hormonal therapy. 86% of patients developed 1st cycle neutropenia which was more common in patients with high Ki67. Dose reduction was recorded in 46.7% of patients and it was more common in patients with higher Allred scores (scores 7–8). The median progression-free survival (PFS) of the study group was 22 months. No significant difference was observed in PFS according to the 1st cycle of neutropenia or grade of neutropenia. Similarly, no difference in PFS according to palbociclib dose reduction and HER2 low status was observed. Only the Allred score and having a single site of metastasis had an independent significant relation with PFS. The median overall survival (OS) of the study group was 39 months. No significant difference was observed in OS according to the 1st cycle neutropenia, grade of neutropenia, palbociclib dose reduction, and HER2-low status. Only the Allred score and having a single site of metastasis had an independent significant relation with OS. In addition, no difference was observed in PFS and OS according to ECOG PS (2 vs. 0-1) or menopausal status.

          Conclusion

          No significant impact of the 1st cycle neutropenia, dose reduction, having ECOG PS2, menopausal status, or HER2 low status on survival outcome was observed. Survival outcome was significantly better in patients with single metastatic sites and higher ER-Allred scores.

          Related collections

          Most cited references20

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Palbociclib and Letrozole in Advanced Breast Cancer.

          Richard Finn, Miguel Martín, Hope Rugo … (2016)
          Background A phase 2 study showed that progression-free survival was longer with palbociclib plus letrozole than with letrozole alone in the initial treatment of postmenopausal women with estrogen-receptor (ER)-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative advanced breast cancer. We performed a phase 3 study that was designed to confirm and expand the efficacy and safety data for palbociclib plus letrozole for this indication. Methods In this double-blind study, we randomly assigned, in a 2:1 ratio, 666 postmenopausal women with ER-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer, who had not had prior treatment for advanced disease, to receive palbociclib plus letrozole or placebo plus letrozole. The primary end point was progression-free survival, as assessed by the investigators; secondary end points were overall survival, objective response, clinical benefit response, patient-reported outcomes, pharmacokinetic effects, and safety. Results The median progression-free survival was 24.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 22.1 to not estimable) in the palbociclib-letrozole group, as compared with 14.5 months (95% CI, 12.9 to 17.1) in the placebo-letrozole group (hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.46 to 0.72; P<0.001). The most common grade 3 or 4 adverse events were neutropenia (occurring in 66.4% of the patients in the palbociclib-letrozole group vs. 1.4% in the placebo-letrozole group), leukopenia (24.8% vs. 0%), anemia (5.4% vs. 1.8%), and fatigue (1.8% vs. 0.5%). Febrile neutropenia was reported in 1.8% of patients in the palbociclib-letrozole group and in none of the patients in the placebo-letrozole group. Permanent discontinuation of any study treatment as a result of adverse events occurred in 43 patients (9.7%) in the palbociclib-letrozole group and in 13 patients (5.9%) in the placebo-letrozole group. Conclusions Among patients with previously untreated ER-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer, palbociclib combined with letrozole resulted in significantly longer progression-free survival than that with letrozole alone, although the rates of myelotoxic effects were higher with palbociclib-letrozole. (Funded by Pfizer; PALOMA-2 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01740427 .).
          Article 0 comments Cited 565 times – based on 0 reviews     Review now
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Ribociclib as First-Line Therapy for HR-Positive, Advanced Breast Cancer

            Gabriel N Hortobagyi, Salomon Stemmer, Howard Burris … (2016)
            Background The inhibition of cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) could potentially overcome or delay resistance to endocrine therapy in advanced breast cancer that is positive for hormone receptor (HR) and negative for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2). Methods In this randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of the selective CDK4/6 inhibitor ribociclib combined with letrozole for first-line treatment in 668 postmenopausal women with HR-positive, HER2-negative recurrent or metastatic breast cancer who had not received previous systemic therapy for advanced disease. We randomly assigned the patients to receive either ribociclib (600 mg per day on a 3-weeks-on, 1-week-off schedule) plus letrozole (2.5 mg per day) or placebo plus letrozole. The primary end point was investigator-assessed progression-free survival. Secondary end points included overall survival, overall response rate, and safety. A preplanned interim analysis was performed on January 29, 2016, after 243 patients had disease progression or died. Prespecified criteria for superiority required a hazard ratio of 0.56 or less with P<1.29×10(-5). Results The duration of progression-free survival was significantly longer in the ribociclib group than in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.43 to 0.72; P=3.29×10(-6) for superiority). The median duration of follow-up was 15.3 months. After 18 months, the progression-free survival rate was 63.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 54.6 to 70.3) in the ribociclib group and 42.2% (95% CI, 34.8 to 49.5) in the placebo group. In patients with measurable disease at baseline, the overall response rate was 52.7% and 37.1%, respectively (P<0.001). Common grade 3 or 4 adverse events that were reported in more than 10% of the patients in either group were neutropenia (59.3% in the ribociclib group vs. 0.9% in the placebo group) and leukopenia (21.0% vs. 0.6%); the rates of discontinuation because of adverse events were 7.5% and 2.1%, respectively. Conclusions Among patients receiving initial systemic treatment for HR-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer, the duration of progression-free survival was significantly longer among those receiving ribociclib plus letrozole than among those receiving placebo plus letrozole, with a higher rate of myelosuppression in the ribociclib group. (Funded by Novartis Pharmaceuticals; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01958021 .).
            Article 0 comments Cited 382 times – based on 0 reviews     Review now
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              MONARCH 2: Abemaciclib in Combination With Fulvestrant in Women With HR+/HER2- Advanced Breast Cancer Who Had Progressed While Receiving Endocrine Therapy.

              Norikazu Masuda, George Sledge, Masakazu Toi … (2017)
              Purpose MONARCH 2 ( ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02107703) compared the efficacy and safety of abemaciclib, a selective cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitor, plus fulvestrant with fulvestrant alone in patients with advanced breast cancer (ABC). Patients and Methods MONARCH 2 was a global, double-blind, phase III study of women with hormone receptor-positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative ABC who had progressed while receiving neoadjuvant or adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET), ≤ 12 months from the end of adjuvant ET, or while receiving first-line ET for metastatic disease. Patients were randomly assigned 2:1 to receive abemaciclib or placebo (150 mg twice daily) on a continuous schedule and fulvestrant (500 mg, per label). The primary end point was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS), and key secondary end points included overall survival, objective response rate (ORR), duration of response, clinical benefit rate, quality of life, and safety. Results Between August 2014 and December 2015, 669 patients were randomly assigned to receive abemaciclib plus fulvestrant (n = 446) or placebo plus fulvestrant (n = 223). Abemaciclib plus fulvestrant significantly extended PFS versus fulvestrant alone (median, 16.4 v 9.3 months; hazard ratio, 0.553; 95% CI, 0.449 to 0.681; P < .001). In patients with measurable disease, abemaciclib plus fulvestrant achieved an ORR of 48.1% (95% CI, 42.6% to 53.6%) compared with 21.3% (95% CI, 15.1% to 27.6%) in the control arm. The most common adverse events in the abemaciclib versus placebo arms were diarrhea (86.4% v 24.7%), neutropenia (46.0% v 4.0%), nausea (45.1% v 22.9%), and fatigue (39.9% v 26.9%). Conclusions Abemaciclib at 150 mg twice daily plus fulvestrant was effective, significantly improving PFS and ORR and demonstrating a tolerable safety profile in women with hormone receptor-positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative ABC who progressed while receiving ET.
              Article 0 comments Cited 345 times – based on 0 reviews     Review now
                Bookmark
                All references

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Hosam Ali Alghanmi:
                ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5540-2793
                Journal
                Journal ID (nlm-ta): Breast J
                Journal ID (iso-abbrev): Breast J
                Journal ID (publisher-id): TBJ
                Title: The Breast Journal
                Publisher: Hindawi
                ISSN (Print): 1075-122X
                ISSN (Electronic): 1524-4741
                Publication date Collection: 2023
                Publication date (Electronic): 25 August 2023
                Volume: 2023
                Electronic Location Identifier: 8994954
                Affiliations
                1Medical Oncology Department, Oncology Center, King Abdullah Medical City, Makkah, Saudi Arabia
                2Medical Oncology, Oncology Center, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt
                3Department of Pharmacy, King Abdullah Medical City, Makkah, Saudi Arabia
                Author notes

                Academic Editor: Rakesh Sathish Nair

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5540-2793
                Article
                DOI: 10.1155/2023/8994954
                PMC ID: 10473893
                PubMed ID: 37664544
                SO-VID: 92776edc-982f-44c0-af41-75701f7f3a55
                Copyright statement: Copyright © 2023 Khaled Abd Elaziz Ahmed Elnaghi et al.
                License:

                This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                Date received : 2 October 2022
                Date revision received : 30 May 2023
                Date accepted : 14 June 2023
                Categories
                Subject: Research Article

                Data availability:

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_

                Similar content439

                See all similar

                Most referenced authors328

                See all reference authors