40
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Column test-based optimization of the permeable reactive barrier (PRB) technique for remediating groundwater contaminated by landfill leachates.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          We investigated the optimum composition of permeable reactive barrier (PRB) materials for remediating groundwater heavily contaminated by landfill leachate, in column tests using various mixtures of zero-valent iron (ZVI), zeolite (Zeo) and activated carbon (AC) with 0.01-0.25, 3.0-5.0 and 0.7-1.0mm grain sizes, respectively. The main contributors to the removal of organic/inorganic contaminants were ZVI and AC, and the optimum weight ratio of the three PRB materials for removing the contaminants and maintaining adequate hydraulic conductivity was found to be 5:1:4. Average reductions in chemical oxygen demand (COD) and contents of total nitrogen (TN), ammonium, Ni, Pb and 16 polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) from test samples using this mixture were 55.8%, 70.8%, 89.2%, 70.7%, 92.7% and 94.2%, respectively. We also developed a systematic method for estimating the minimum required thickness and longevity of the PRB materials. A ≥ 309.6 cm layer with the optimum composition is needed for satisfactory longevity, defined here as meeting the Grade III criteria (the Chinese National Bureau of Standards: GB/T14848/93) for in situ treatment of the sampled groundwater for ≥ 10 years.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          J. Contam. Hydrol.
          Journal of contaminant hydrology
          Elsevier BV
          1873-6009
          0169-7722
          Nov 01 2014
          : 168
          Affiliations
          [1 ] Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Marine Resources and Coastal Engineering, School of Marine Sciences, Sun Yat-sen, University, 135 Xin'gang RD.W., Guangzhou 510275, PR China; Key Laboratory for Aquatic Product Safety of Ministry of Education, School of Marine Sciences, Sun Yat-sen, University, 135 Xin'gang RD.W., Guangzhou 510275, PR China.
          [2 ] Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Marine Resources and Coastal Engineering, School of Marine Sciences, Sun Yat-sen, University, 135 Xin'gang RD.W., Guangzhou 510275, PR China; Key Laboratory for Aquatic Product Safety of Ministry of Education, School of Marine Sciences, Sun Yat-sen, University, 135 Xin'gang RD.W., Guangzhou 510275, PR China. Electronic address: eesly@mail.sysu.edu.cn.
          [3 ] South China Institute of Environmental Science, Ministry of Environmental Protection, No. 7 West Street, Yuancun, Guangzhou 510655, PR China.
          [4 ] Shandong Bonaray Analysis Instrument Technology Co., Ltd, Building A5, High and New Technology Industrial Development Zone, Jining 272000, PR China.
          [5 ] Guangdong Provincial Environmental Technology Center, 28 Modiesha Avenue, Xingang Dong Road, Guangzhou 510308, PR China.
          [6 ] Nanhai Environmental Technology Center of Foshan City, Environmental Protection Building, 4 New RD. 3S., Guicheng, Foshan 528200, PR China.
          [7 ] Graduate School of Engineering, Kyoto University, Yoshida-Honmachi, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan.
          [8 ] National College of Technology, 355 Chokushicho, Takamatsu-shi, Kagawa 761-8058, Japan.
          Article
          S0169-7722(14)00147-8
          10.1016/j.jconhyd.2014.09.003
          25244420
          927ea994-3c4f-4ef3-b8dd-1a32650d4ffd
          History

          Permeable reactive barrier (PRB),Component ratio,Thickness,Remediation,Longevity,Groundwater,Contamination

          Comments

          Comment on this article