11
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      To submit to the journal, please click here

      We invite news and articles concerning all aspects of academic and professional publishing. Papers are welcomed from across the scholarly publishing community.

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Fortification of retraction notices to improve their transparency and usefulness

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Retraction notices (RNs) are historical documents and must be as informative as possible to ensure the scholarly record is complete. RNs must be complete, informative, open, transparent, and comprehensive, and must include clear indication of fault and responsibility. A guideline about what RNs should or should not contain will help to ensure consistency and completeness. Declarations‐related retractions can be prevented by conducting a thorough check in the initial quality check. The issuer of the RN should be named in the notice, and may include the name of research institutions and funders if necessary. To ensure complete transparency, RNs should include details of any investigation that supported the decision.

          Related collections

          Most cited references59

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications.

          A detailed review of all 2,047 biomedical and life-science research articles indexed by PubMed as retracted on May 3, 2012 revealed that only 21.3% of retractions were attributable to error. In contrast, 67.4% of retractions were attributable to misconduct, including fraud or suspected fraud (43.4%), duplicate publication (14.2%), and plagiarism (9.8%). Incomplete, uninformative or misleading retraction announcements have led to a previous underestimation of the role of fraud in the ongoing retraction epidemic. The percentage of scientific articles retracted because of fraud has increased ∼10-fold since 1975. Retractions exhibit distinctive temporal and geographic patterns that may reveal underlying causes.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            The (ir)rational consideration of the cost of science in transition economies

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Reform retractions to make them more transparent

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                (View ORCID Profile)
                Journal
                Learned Publishing
                Learned Publishing
                John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
                0953-1513
                1741-4857
                April 2022
                July 06 2021
                April 2022
                : 35
                : 2
                : 292-299
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Independent researcher Kagawa‐ken Japan
                [2 ]Centre for Interdisciplinary Social Research Phenikaa University Hanoi Vietnam
                [3 ]Centre Emile Bernheim Université Libre de Bruxelles Brussels Belgium
                Article
                10.1002/leap.1409
                92a69084-09e4-4e15-b96d-9d7fcc8e459a
                © 2022

                http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor

                http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1

                History

                Assessment, Evaluation & Research methods,Intellectual property law,Information & Library science,Communication & Media studies
                transparency,opacity,predatory publishing,verification,guidelines,trust,integrity,retraction of publication,publishing

                Comments

                Comment on this article