Chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML), a myeloproliferative disorder of haemopoietic stem
cell origin, is characterised by the t(9;22) reciprocal translocation giving rise
to a shortened chromosome 22, the so-called Philadelphia (Ph) chromosome. The resultant
novel fusion oncoprotein, BCR-ABL, has constitutive tyrosine kinase activity and is
considered causative in the disease. BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase impinges on a number
of downstream signalling pathways resulting in the disruption of normal control of
cellular events such as proliferation, adhesion to bone marrow stroma and apoptosis
(reviewed in Sawyers, 1999). As BCR-ABL protein expression is disease specific, and
is present in 95% of CML cases, it was a logical target for rationally designed therapy.
Indeed, signal transduction inhibitor 571 (STI571) emerged as a fastidious BCR-ABL
antagonist (Druker et al, 1996) inducing remarkable haematological and cytogenetic
remissions in interferon-intolerant, -refractory or -resistant CML patients in the
stable chronic phase of the disease (Druker et al, 2001). STI571 is now marketed as
Glivec® (Gleevec® in USA); however, the current focus of many laboratories is to elucidate
mechanisms of resistance which may emerge to the drug. In modelling such events, the
hope would be that clinicians could deliver a pre-emptive strike against what is proving
to be a tenacious and fascinating adversary in BCR-ABL.
DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS AND TREATMENT
CML is a triphasic disease, beginning with a relatively innocuous chronic phase (CP),
in which 50% of patients may be asymptomatic, which lasts on average 4–5 years, progressing
into accelerated phase (AP, 6–18 months duration) and terminating in fatal blast crisis
(BC, 6 months) (Sawyers, 1999). As CML progresses to BC, the malignant clone acquires
additional genetic mutations, including trisomy 8, isochromosome i (17q), trisomy
19 and double Ph, in the majority of patients and so the therapeutic window, in terms
of curative intent, is present only in the early course of the disease. Moreover,
mutations, deletions and rearrangements of tumour-suppressor genes often arise.
In the 1950s, radiotherapy, splenectomy or chemotherapy were the mainstay of treatment
for CML. However, neither busulfan nor hydroxyurea, antimetabolites still in use today,
are more than palliative as they fail to induce cytogenetic remission (CyR). Interferon
alpha (IFN-α), however, can induce a major CyR (⩽35% Ph+ metaphases) in up to 38%
of patients, although its use is associated with severe side effects, with the majority
of patients requiring dose reduction, or, indeed, cessation. IFN-α may be coadministered
with low-dose cytarabine, with better response rates and survival being observed (Guilhot
et al, 1997); however, the combination tends to cause greater gastrointestinal tract
and mucosal toxicity. Another drug used in combination with IFN-α is homoharringtonine
(O'Brien et al, 2002), which is a plant alkaloid with comparable activity. Recently,
a pegylated form of IFN has entered clinical trials (Talpaz et al, 2001). Pegylated
IFN-α has longer residence time in the body, hence a weekly, rather than daily, subcutaneous
dosing regimen. Of 27 CML patients intolerant or resistant to IFN-α entered into a
Phase I trial, pegylated IFN-α induced a complete CyR in two of 19 patients with active
disease. Of the remaining eight patients already in complete haematological remission
(CHR), four achieved a complete, and three a partial, CyR (Talpaz et al, 2001).
To date, only allogeneic bone marrow (allo-BMT) or peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC)
transplants offered any hope of a cure for CML. Transplants cannot be offered to all
patients, however, owing to the lack of donor availability. Further, the age-related
increased risk of undergoing a transplant, along with greater likelihood of concomitant
disease such as diabetes or heart disease, mean that in general this procedure is
not performed on patients over the age of 55 years. Thus, as p210BCR-ABL is present
in 95% of CML patients, is thought causative in the disease, and is constitutively
active, a drug specifically designed to target its tyrosine kinase activity would
offer the best hope for a nontransplant cure.
IMATINIB MESYLATE
One such molecularly targeted small molecule inhibitor is imatinib mesylate (formerly
STI571) a 2-phenylamino pyrimidine compound (Figure 1A
Figure 1
(A) Molecular structure of imatinib. (B) Mode of action of imatinib. (i) ATP binds
to BCR/ABL and phosphorylates a tyrosine (Y) residue of the substrate. The substrate
can then bind to an effector molecule triggering the cellular response. (ii) Imatinib
binds to BCR/ABL blocking the binding of ATP, thus the substrate tyrosine molecule
is not phosphorylated and cannot in turn bind and activate the effector molecule.
). The BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase requires phosphate from ATP to phosphorylate its substrate
molecules. Imatinib occupies the ATP-binding site on BCR-ABL, thus preventing substrate
phosphorylation (Figure 1B). Imatinib is not specific to BCR-ABL as it also interacts
with the cell surface receptor c-KIT in addition to regulating the kinase activity
of the platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR) (Druker et al, 1996). Indeed,
imatinib has been found to inhibit phosphorylation of c-KIT implicated in gastrointestinal
stromal tumours and now provides a new therapeutic option for this most common of
all gastrointestinal tract mesenchymal tumours (Demetri et al, 2002).
Imatinib has a low toxicity profile compared to many other cytotoxic agents, indeed
a maximum tolerated dose was not reached in Phase I/II trials in CML (Druker et al,
2001). The most common side effects were low-grade nausea, vomiting and other gastrointestinal
side effects including diarrhoea, reflux and taste disturbance, as well as oedema
(in particular periorbital), and skin rashes. In a small proportion of patients, these
toxicities significantly affected their quality of life. For those patients in BC
taking imatinib at the higher dose of 800–1000 mg day−1, more toxic side effects (Grade
3–4 thrombocytopenia and neutropenia) were evident. It should be remembered that pancytopenia
is more commonly seen in AP/BC CML reflecting the suppression of normal haemopoiesis
at this stage of the disease. Platelet and WBC counts may take time to normalise on
imatinib; however, if counts do not recover adequately, these effects can be minimised
by imatinib dose reduction or temporary cessation of treatment.
Numerous clinical trials have been conducted using imatinib as a treatment for CML
(summarised in Table 1
Table 1
Comparison of responses to imatinib therapy in CML
Study
Disease phase
No. of patients
Imatinib (daily dose)
Complete HR (%)
a
MCyR (%)
Complete CyR (%)
bIRIS (imatinib) Guilhot et al (2002)d
cCP-Dx
553
400 mg
94
83
68
IRIS (IFN-α)
CP-Dx
553
5 MIU m
−2
IFN + 20 mg m
−2
cytarabine
55
20
7
Druker et al (2001)
CP
54
>300 mg
98
54
13
Kantarjian et al (2002c)
Late CP
454
400 mg
95
76
41
Kantarjian et al (2002b)
AP
200
400–600 mg
80
45
24
Talpaz et al (2002)
AP
181
400–600 mg
53
48
17
Kantarjian et al (2002a)
BC
75
300–1000 mg
21
11
6
Sawyers et al (2002)
BC
229
400–600 mg
15
31
7
a
MCyR=major cytogenetic response defined as complete (0% Ph+) or partial (1–35% Ph+).
b
IRIS=International Randomized IFN vs. STI571 study.
c
CP-Dx=newly diagnosed chronic phase.
d
And personal communication from Dr Stephen O'Brien, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle.
, Druker et al, 2001; Guilhot et al, 2002; Kantarjian et al, 2002a,2002b,2002c; Sawyers
et al, 2002; Talpaz et al, 2002). The published results of these trials have been
very encouraging, and would argue for the need for commencement of imatinib therapy
following diagnosis to elicit durable responses. Loss of imatinib-induced remissions
is presumably because of emerging drug resistance. BCR-ABL reactivation can arise
through gene amplification, resulting in higher levels of BCR-ABL protein (Le Coutre
et al, 2000; Mahon et al, 2000; Weisberg and Griffin, 2000; Gorre et al, 2001). Alternatively,
a gene mutation in the ATP-binding pocket on BCR-ABL, which is the site of action
of imatinib, results in the inability of imatinib to competitively bind out ATP (Gorre
et al, 2001), although other mechanisms of resistance may operate.
MECHANISMS OF RESISTANCE TO IMATINIB IN Ph+ CELLS
Gene amplification
It has been reported that in a proportion of CML BC-derived cell lines, grown in vitro
in the continuous presence of imatinib, BCR-ABL gene amplification is observed (Le
Coutre et al, 2000; Mahon et al, 2000; Weisberg and Griffin, 2000). Overexpression
of BCR-ABL protein has been identified in BCR-ABL transfected murine Ba/F3 cells as
well as in human LAMA84 and AR230 CML cell lines (Mahon et al, 2000). The exact mechanism
controlling this enhanced BCR-ABL gene transcription and translation remains uncertain,
although it is not at the level of the BCR gene promoter. If this were the case, the
native BCR gene on the unaffected chromosome 22 would also be expressed at increased
levels in resistant cells. In fact, BCR expression was much reduced in the LAMA84-resistant
cells as well as in the AR230-resistant cells (Mahon et al, 2000). Since BCR protein
has been proposed as a negative regulator of BCR-ABL (Wu et al, 1999), low BCR levels
would compound the insensitivity to imatinib. Le Coutre et al (2000) demonstrated
BCR-ABL mRNA transcription to be 4.6 times higher in their LAMA84-resistant cell line
than in the parental imatinib-sensitive cell line. Further, using FISH, the LAMA84R
cells were found to harbour ⩾15 BCR-ABL gene copies per cell. This study provides
further compelling evidence implicating gene amplification in resistance to imatinib.
To determine whether the gene amplification phenomenon occurred in patients, clinical
samples from CML patients who relapsed after initially responding to imatinib, were
analysed (Gorre et al, 2001). In three of 11 samples, multiple copies of the BCR-ABL
gene were identified in interphase nuclei by FISH (two of three were myeloid BC, the
other lymphoid BC). Rather than an overexpressed subclone attaining a relative growth
advantage, it has been hypothesised that imatinib itself may have initiated the BCR-ABL
gene amplification. For example, in one of these three patients who received alternative
treatment for relapsed leukaemia, it was no longer possible, 4 weeks after cessation
of imatinib therapy, to detect BCR-ABL gene amplification. While these are interesting
observations, the number of patients in this cohort was small, hence the findings
may not be truly representative of all CML BC patients, nor of CML which progresses
from CP. Interestingly, Tipping et al could restore sensitivity of a LAMA84-resistant
cell line to imatinib after 2 months withdrawal from continuous exposure to the drug.
It was surmised that a subgroup of resistant patients may benefit from interruption,
followed by resumption at a later date, of therapy (Tipping et al, 2001).
Mutations in ATP-binding pocket
Another mechanism underlying imatinib resistance is point mutations in the BCR-ABL
gene altering the conformation of the ATP-binding pocket such that imatinib no longer
has affinity. Analysis of the 579-base pair region, which gives rise to the ATP-binding
pocket and the activation loop of the kinase domain on BCR-ABL, revealed in six of
nine patients a C→T change at nucleotide 944 (Gorre et al, 2001). The latter transition
corresponds to an isoleucine substitution for threonine at position 315 (T315I) in
the ATP-binding pocket, which does not inhibit ATP binding. Such a change, however,
would inhibit drug binding owing to steric hindrance and loss of critical hydrogen
bond formation. Von Bubnoff et al (2002) have analysed a group of eight patients with
Ph+ leukaemias, of which two were CML in BC or AP/BC. This group also detected the
T315I in one patient, as well as reporting four novel point mutations all located
within the drug-binding pocket on BCR-ABL. Branford et al (2002) found that nine of
12 CML patients resistant to imatinib had a mutation within the ATP-binding region
of BCR-ABL. A range of mutations was observed, including T315I. Roumiantsev et al
(2002) found that the Y253F mutation in the Abl kinase domain conferred intermediate
resistance to imatinib, both in vitro and in vivo, relative to the T315I mutation.
However, the clinical significance of the T315I mutation to imatinib resistance was
questioned by the studies of Barthe et al (2001) and Hochhaus et al (2001). The former
group found no C→T transition, and only one G→A mutation in their analysis of 12 patients,
while the latter study identified only one A→T mutation in a cohort of 32 patients.
Mahon et al (2000) studied the Ph+ imatinib resistant-cell lines K562-R and AR230-R,
but found no mutations in the ATP binding pocket. Similarly, Le Coutre et al (2000)
identified no mutations in their LAMA84R cell line. It should be borne in mind, however,
the likely range of mutations that will be observed in populations of different genetic
background (Barthe et al, 2001).
While there is now some consensus regarding the particular mutations detected, the
reported incidence of each mutation in patients is variable. The most recent data
are more relevant to the clinic since the cells used in these analyses were procured
from patients, compared to previous studies employing cell lines (Le Coutre et al,
2000; Mahon et al, 2000).
Alpha-1-acid glycoprotein (AGP)
Alpha-1-acid glycoprotein (AGP), an extensively glycosylated plasma protein and known
binder of drugs (Fournier et al, 2000), changes both quantitatively and qualitatively
(in terms of glycosylation) in response to inflammation and disease, such as cancer.
In a recent study by Jørgensen et al (2002b) investigating a possible link between
decreased imatinib efficacy and AGP-drug binding, AGP levels were found to be significantly
raised in CML patients at all stages of disease compared to normal controls. Normal
AGP, even at up to seven times the normal population average concentration of 0.77 mg ml−1
(Blain et al, 1985), had no influence on the effect of imatinib on the Ph+ K562 BC
cell line. AGP isolated from individual CML patients did not confer any loss of function
of imatinib in the assay. Further, in a direct binding assay whereby any AGP-imatinib
interaction is detected as fluorescence quenching, imatinib did not bind normal AGP
at clinically relevant concentrations of the drug (5 μ
M) (Jørgensen et al, 2002c). Gorre et al (2001) clearly demonstrated cell intrinsic
mechanisms of resistance to Glivec® whereby cells taken from relapsing patients showed
reduced sensitivity to the drug with evidence of acquired molecular changes such as
gene mutation or amplification.
However, Gambacorti-Passerini et al, 2000 (Le Coutre et al, 2002) argue for a role
for AGP-imatinib binding as a mechanism of drug resistance. To overcome their observed
binding of normal AGP (which by definition will have a different glycosylation pattern
from CML-derived AGP and be of limited clinical relevance) to imatinib, it was suggested
using clindamycin or erythromycin concomitantly, since the antibiotics purportedly
compete with imatinib for AGP-binding sites. Larghero et al (2001) found whole sera
from BC CML patients, comprising AGP up to 3 mg ml−1 and numerous other drug-binding
candidates, to prevent K562 cell death in vitro when incubated with up to 10 μ
M imatinib. Reportedly, erythromycin addition reversed the effect of AGP. The fact
that all the patients in BC failed to respond to imatinib was attributed to the high
levels of AGP, while those in the early phases of the disease with lower AGP levels
responded to the drug. It was noted in a cohort of 39 patients (Le Coutre et al, 2002)
that AGP levels were related to rate of response to imatinib; however, the effectiveness
of the drug was unaltered by AGP concentration. None of the studies supporting AGP-imatinib
binding convincingly distinguish ‘cause and effect’. It has not been proven definitively
that an elevated AGP plasma concentration is the direct cause of imatinib resistance
as opposed to simply being a surrogate marker for disease progression.
Quiescent stem cells
To further add to the mechanisms of resistance to imatinib, results from a study by
Graham et al (2002) stress the importance of quiescent Ph+ stem cells. These cells,
which can be isolated from all CML patients in CP, are phenotypically primitive expressing
the stem cell marker, CD34, and are part of the leukaemic clone being BCR-ABL
+
by RT-PCR and Ph+ by FISH. While the cells are out of cycle, they have been found
to be resistant to the anti-leukaemic effects of imatinib. This would be problematic
in patients in whom a molecular remission has been induced by imatinib, which is then
discontinued. If quiescent Ph+ stem cells persist, which retain the potential to spontaneously
enter a proliferating state, the leukaemic clone would then be re-established and
CML would recur. In this scenario, continued treatment, even in the minimal residual
disease scenario, would be required to target newly emerging leukaemic cells. From
a pharmacoeconomic point of view, however, it would be preferable to completely eradicate
the Ph+ clone enabling discontinuation of therapy. Furthermore, a maintenance strategy
runs the risk of forcing the emergence of truly resistant clones, that is, resistant
through additional mechanisms other than by virtue of their quiescence.
Multidrug resistance protein
Resistance of certain cancer cells to drugs such as anthracycline or vinca alkaloids
can be caused by an increase in the expression of the multidrug resistance-1 (MDR-1)
gene (Brinkmann et al, 2001). This gene encodes P-glycoprotein (Pgp), a member of
the ATP-binding cassette (ABC) protein family, which function to remove toxic molecules
from cells. The imatinib-resistant leukaemic cell line LAMA84R was observed to express
Pgp at higher levels than the sensitive cell line (Mahon et al, 2000). Furthermore,
cells taken from patients in BC were found to express Pgp only when the patients had
relapsed, and not when they were responding to therapy (Kuwazuru et al, 1990). Recent
results have indicated that there is a correlation between MDR-1 gene expression and
relapse of patients taking imatinib (Deininger et al, 2001). Higher levels of MDR-1
are observed at the time of relapse compared to levels pre-therapy. While the leukaemic
cells may themselves have increased numbers of such xenobiotic transporters, Pgp is
also located on the epithelial cells of the gastrointestinal tract. This may decrease
upper gastrointestinal absorption of orally administered drugs, such as imatinib,
resulting in yet another potential method of resistance. Furthermore, single nucleotide
polymorphisms in the MDR-1 gene may result in altered affinity for cytotoxic drugs,
possibly explaining imatinib insensitivity in some patients (Brinkmann et al, 2001).
CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE PERSPECTIVES
In summary, it is becoming apparent that a variety of mechanisms may result in resistance
to imatinib, and indeed some patients may exhibit more than one mode of resistance.
In order to combat this, combinatorial therapies against proliferating Ph+ cells,
and attempts to eradicate quiescent leukaemic stem cells (Jørgensen et al, 2002a),
will be of great importance in treatment of CML. Combinations of imatinib with IFN-α
or vincristine (Kano et al, 2001); daunorubicin or cytarabine arabinoside (Thiesing
et al, 2000); or more novel compounds such as the Janus kinase 2 (JAK2) inhibitor
AG490 (Sun et al, 2001); or farnesyl transferase inhibitors (FTI) (Hoover et al, 2002)
including SCH66336, may synergistically enhance the effect of imatinib alone. It has
yet to be shown if improved survival rates may be achieved by prescribing imatinib
along with additional agents in relapsing CML patients. However, pre-emptive combinatorial
therapies may prove to avert, or at least delay resistance to imatinib therapy. In
addition to selecting a synergistic partner for imatinib, dose scheduling must also
be considered as it has also been reported that imatinib sensitivity may be restored
in certain drug-resistant CML cells (Tipping et al, 2001). It appears to be beneficial
to stop treatment with imatinib temporarily and resume at a later date, at which point
the CML cells appear sensitive to the drug once again. This phenomenon may be explained
by the lack of selection pressure for BCR-ABL imposed on CML cells by imatinib.
Clearly, there are still advances to be made towards the nontransplant cure of CML,
but given the unprecedented rapid regulatory approval given to imatinib by the Food
and Drug Administration (FDA), further developments of safe and effective, rationally
designed drugs should be available to patients quicker than ever before.