17
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Applying the Theoretical Domains Framework to identify barriers and targeted interventions to enhance nurses’ use of electronic medication management systems in two Australian hospitals

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Medication errors harm hospitalised patients and increase health care costs. Electronic Medication Management Systems (EMMS) have been shown to reduce medication errors. However, nurses do not always use EMMS as intended, largely because implementation of such patient safety strategies requires clinicians to change their existing practices, routines and behaviour. This study uses the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) to identify barriers and targeted interventions to enhance nurses’ appropriate use of EMMS in two Australian hospitals.

          Methods

          This qualitative study draws on in-depth interviews with 19 acute care nurses who used EMMS. A convenience sampling approach was used. Nurses working on the study units ( N = 6) in two hospitals were invited to participate if available during the data collection period. Interviews inductively explored nurses’ experiences of using EMMS (step 1). Data were analysed using the TDF to identify theory-derived barriers to nurses’ appropriate use of EMMS (step 2). Relevant behaviour change techniques (BCTs) were identified to overcome key barriers to using EMMS (step 3) followed by the identification of potential literature-informed targeted intervention strategies to operationalise the identified BCTs (step 4).

          Results

          Barriers to nurses’ use of EMMS in acute care were represented by nine domains of the TDF. Two closely linked domains emerged as major barriers to EMMS use: Environmental Context and Resources (availability and properties of computers on wheels (COWs); technology characteristics; specific contexts; competing demands and time pressure) and Social/Professional Role and Identity (conflict between using EMMS appropriately and executing behaviours critical to nurses’ professional role and identity).

          The study identified three potential BCTs to address the Environmental Context and Resources domain barrier: adding objects to the environment; restructuring the physical environment; and prompts and cues. Seven BCTs to address Social/Professional Role and Identity were identified: social process of encouragement; pressure or support; information about others’ approval; incompatible beliefs; identification of self as role model; framing/reframing; social comparison; and demonstration of behaviour. It proposes several targeted interventions to deliver these BCTs.

          Conclusions

          The TDF provides a useful approach to identify barriers to nurses’ prescribed use of EMMS, and can inform the design of targeted theory-based interventions to improve EMMS implementation.

          Electronic supplementary material

          The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13012-017-0572-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

          Related collections

          Most cited references39

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Book: not found

          Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Theories of reasoned action and planned behavior as models of condom use: a meta-analysis.

            To examine how well the theories of reasoned action and planned behavior predict condom use, the authors synthesized 96 data sets (N = 22,594) containing associations between the models' key variables. Consistent with the theory of reasoned action's predictions, (a) condom use was related to intentions (weighted mean r. = .45), (b) intentions were based on attitudes (r. = .58) and subjective norms (r. = .39), and (c) attitudes were associated with behavioral beliefs (r. = .56) and norms were associated with normative beliefs (r. = .46). Consistent with the theory of planned behavior's predictions, perceived behavioral control was related to condom use intentions (r. = .45) and condom use (r. = .25), but in contrast to the theory, it did not contribute significantly to condom use. The strength of these associations, however, was influenced by the consideration of past behavior. Implications of these results for HIV prevention efforts are discussed.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Experiences of using the Theoretical Domains Framework across diverse clinical environments: a qualitative study

              Background The Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) is an integrative framework developed from a synthesis of psychological theories as a vehicle to help apply theoretical approaches to interventions aimed at behavior change. Purpose This study explores experiences of TDF use by professionals from multiple disciplines across diverse clinical settings. Methods Mixed methods were used to examine experiences, attitudes, and perspectives of health professionals in using the TDF in health care implementation projects. Individual interviews were conducted with ten health care professionals from six disciplines who used the TDF in implementation projects. Deductive content and thematic analysis were used. Results Three main themes and associated subthemes were identified including: 1) reasons for use of the TDF (increased confidence, broader perspective, and theoretical underpinnings); 2) challenges using the TDF (time and resources, operationalization of the TDF) and; 3) future use of the TDF. Conclusion The TDF provided a useful, flexible framework for a diverse group of health professionals working across different clinical settings for the assessment of barriers and targeting resources to influence behavior change for implementation projects. The development of practical tools and training or support is likely to aid the utility of TDF.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                +61-2-9514-5256 , deborah.debono@uts.edu.au
                n.taylor@mq.edu.au
                wendy.lipworth@sydney.edu.au
                david.greenfield@utas.edu.au
                joanne.travaglia@uts.edu.au
                deborah.black@sydney.edu.au
                jeffrey.braithwaite@mq.edu.au
                Journal
                Implement Sci
                Implement Sci
                Implementation Science : IS
                BioMed Central (London )
                1748-5908
                27 March 2017
                27 March 2017
                2017
                : 12
                : 42
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2158 5405, GRID grid.1004.5, Centre for Healthcare Resilience and Implementation Science, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, , Macquarie University, ; Sydney, NSW Australia
                [2 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1936 834X, GRID grid.1013.3, Centre for Values, Ethics and Law in Medicine, , University of Sydney, ; Sydney, NSW Australia
                [3 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1936 7611, GRID grid.117476.2, Faculty of Health, , University of Technology, ; Sydney, NSW Australia
                [4 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1936 834X, GRID grid.1013.3, Faculty of Health Sciences, , University of Sydney, ; Sydney, NSW Australia
                [5 ]Australian Institute of Health Services Management, University of Tasmania, Sydney, Australia
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0502-2087
                Article
                572
                10.1186/s13012-017-0572-1
                5368903
                28347319
                92cc947a-b44a-4876-a4d4-5d11aa8efe27
                © The Author(s). 2017

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 12 October 2016
                : 16 March 2017
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000925, National Health and Medical Research Council;
                Award ID: 568612
                Award ID: APP1054146
                Award Recipient :
                Categories
                Research
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2017

                Medicine
                implementation,theoretical domains framework,behaviour change,electronic medication management systems,medication administration,workarounds

                Comments

                Comment on this article