51
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Is it only humans that count from left to right?

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          We report that adult nutcrackers ( Nucifraga columbiana) and newborn domestic chicks ( Gallus gallus) show a leftward bias when required to locate an object in a series of identical ones on the basis of its ordinal position. Birds were trained to peck at either the fourth or sixth element in a series of 16 identical and aligned positions. These were placed in front of the bird, sagittally with respect to its starting position. When, at test, the series was rotated by 90° lying frontoparallel to the bird's starting position, both species showed a bias for identifying selectively the correct position from the left but not from the right end. The similarity with the well-known phenomenon of the left-to-right spatially oriented number line in humans is considered.

          Related collections

          Most cited references2

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Survival with an asymmetrical brain: advantages and disadvantages of cerebral lateralization.

          Recent evidence in natural and semi-natural settings has revealed a variety of left-right perceptual asymmetries among vertebrates. These include preferential use of the left or right visual hemifield during activities such as searching for food, agonistic responses, or escape from predators in animals as different as fish, amphibians, reptiles, birds, and mammals. There are obvious disadvantages in showing such directional asymmetries because relevant stimuli may be located to the animal's left or right at random; there is no a priori association between the meaning of a stimulus (e.g., its being a predator or a food item) and its being located to the animal's left or right. Moreover, other organisms (e.g., predators) could exploit the predictability of behavior that arises from population-level lateral biases. It might be argued that lateralization of function enhances cognitive capacity and efficiency of the brain, thus counteracting the ecological disadvantages of lateral biases in behavior. However, such an increase in brain efficiency could be obtained by each individual being lateralized without any need to align the direction of the asymmetry in the majority of the individuals of the population. Here we argue that the alignment of the direction of behavioral asymmetries at the population level arises as an "evolutionarily stable strategy" under "social" pressures occurring when individually asymmetrical organisms must coordinate their behavior with the behavior of other asymmetrical organisms of the same or different species.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            The case of the line-bisection: when both humans and chickens wander left.

              Bookmark

              Author and article information

              Journal
              Biol Lett
              RSBL
              roybiolett
              Biology Letters
              The Royal Society
              1744-9561
              1744-957X
              23 June 2010
              13 January 2010
              13 January 2010
              : 6
              : 3
              : 290-292
              Affiliations
              [1 ]Centre for Mind/Brain Sciences, simpleUniversity of Trento , Corso Bettini 31, 38068 Rovereto, Italy
              [2 ]Department of Psychology, simpleUniversity of Saskatchewan , Saskatoon, Canada
              [3 ]Department of General Psychology, simpleUniversity of Padova , Italy
              Author notes
              [* ]Author for correspondence ( rosa.rugani@ 123456unitn.it ).
              Article
              rsbl20090960
              10.1098/rsbl.2009.0960
              2880063
              20071393
              92cff364-7f35-4fa0-8980-920ba9106948
              © 2010 The Royal Society

              This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

              History
              : 20 November 2009
              : 14 December 2010
              Categories
              1001
              42
              14
              Animal Behaviour

              Life sciences
              avian brain,domestic chick,mental number line,clark's nutcracker
              Life sciences
              avian brain, domestic chick, mental number line, clark's nutcracker

              Comments

              Comment on this article