7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Encoding of kinetic and kinematic movement parameters in the sensorimotor cortex: A Brain‐Computer Interface perspective

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          For severely paralyzed people, Brain‐Computer Interfaces ( BCIs) can potentially replace lost motor output and provide a brain‐based control signal for augmentative and alternative communication devices or neuroprosthetics. Many BCIs focus on neuronal signals acquired from the hand area of the sensorimotor cortex, employing changes in the patterns of neuronal firing or spectral power associated with one or more types of hand movement. Hand and finger movement can be described by two groups of movement features, namely kinematics (spatial and motion aspects) and kinetics (muscles and forces). Despite extensive primate and human research, it is not fully understood how these features are represented in the SMC and how they lead to the appropriate movement. Yet, the available information may provide insight into which features are most suitable for BCI control. To that purpose, the current paper provides an in‐depth review on the movement features encoded in the SMC. Even though there is no consensus on how exactly the SMC generates movement, we conclude that some parameters are well represented in the SMC and can be accurately used for BCI control with discrete as well as continuous feedback. However, the vast evidence also suggests that movement should be interpreted as a combination of multiple parameters rather than isolated ones, pleading for further exploration of sensorimotor control models for accurate BCI control.

          Abstract

          All kinematic and kinetic movement parameters are to some extent represented in the sensorimotor cortex. Individual finger movement, movement direction, complex hand movements, and movement trajectories can be best discriminated in the SMC and potentially used for BCI. Understanding how SMC encodes movements is particularly relevant for finding the best neural control signal for brain computer interface applications.

          Related collections

          Most cited references126

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Mechanisms of gamma oscillations.

          Gamma rhythms are commonly observed in many brain regions during both waking and sleep states, yet their functions and mechanisms remain a matter of debate. Here we review the cellular and synaptic mechanisms underlying gamma oscillations and outline empirical questions and controversial conceptual issues. Our main points are as follows: First, gamma-band rhythmogenesis is inextricably tied to perisomatic inhibition. Second, gamma oscillations are short-lived and typically emerge from the coordinated interaction of excitation and inhibition, which can be detected as local field potentials. Third, gamma rhythm typically concurs with irregular firing of single neurons, and the network frequency of gamma oscillations varies extensively depending on the underlying mechanism. To document gamma oscillations, efforts should be made to distinguish them from mere increases of gamma-band power and/or increased spiking activity. Fourth, the magnitude of gamma oscillation is modulated by slower rhythms. Such cross-frequency coupling may serve to couple active patches of cortical circuits. Because of their ubiquitous nature and strong correlation with the "operational modes" of local circuits, gamma oscillations continue to provide important clues about neuronal population dynamics in health and disease.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Brain Computer Interfaces, a Review

            A brain-computer interface (BCI) is a hardware and software communications system that permits cerebral activity alone to control computers or external devices. The immediate goal of BCI research is to provide communications capabilities to severely disabled people who are totally paralyzed or ‘locked in’ by neurological neuromuscular disorders, such as amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, brain stem stroke, or spinal cord injury. Here, we review the state-of-the-art of BCIs, looking at the different steps that form a standard BCI: signal acquisition, preprocessing or signal enhancement, feature extraction, classification and the control interface. We discuss their advantages, drawbacks, and latest advances, and we survey the numerous technologies reported in the scientific literature to design each step of a BCI. First, the review examines the neuroimaging modalities used in the signal acquisition step, each of which monitors a different functional brain activity such as electrical, magnetic or metabolic activity. Second, the review discusses different electrophysiological control signals that determine user intentions, which can be detected in brain activity. Third, the review includes some techniques used in the signal enhancement step to deal with the artifacts in the control signals and improve the performance. Fourth, the review studies some mathematic algorithms used in the feature extraction and classification steps which translate the information in the control signals into commands that operate a computer or other device. Finally, the review provides an overview of various BCI applications that control a range of devices.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Neuronal population coding of movement direction.

              Although individual neurons in the arm area of the primate motor cortex are only broadly tuned to a particular direction in three-dimensional space, the animal can very precisely control the movement of its arm. The direction of movement was found to be uniquely predicted by the action of a population of motor cortical neurons. When individual cells were represented as vectors that make weighted contributions along the axis of their preferred direction (according to changes in their activity during the movement under consideration) the resulting vector sum of all cell vectors (population vector) was in a direction congruent with the direction of movement. This population vector can be monitored during various tasks, and similar measures in other neuronal populations could be of heuristic value where there is a neural representation of variables with vectorial attributes.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                M.J.vanSteensel@umcutrecht.nl
                Journal
                Eur J Neurosci
                Eur. J. Neurosci
                10.1111/(ISSN)1460-9568
                EJN
                The European Journal of Neuroscience
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                0953-816X
                1460-9568
                30 January 2019
                September 2019
                : 50
                : 5 ( doiID: 10.1111/ejn.v50.5 )
                : 2755-2772
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Brain Center Rudolf Magnus Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery University Medical Center Utrecht Utrecht The Netherlands
                [ 2 ] University of Amsterdam Amsterdam The Netherlands
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                Mariska J. Vansteensel, Brain Center Rudolf Magnus, Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands.

                Email: M.J.vanSteensel@ 123456umcutrecht.nl

                [†]

                These authors contributed equally to this article.

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7316-8846
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9252-5116
                Article
                EJN14342
                10.1111/ejn.14342
                6625947
                30633413
                92e764e5-9dd5-45e8-b3ef-0dbe755bd9d7
                © 2019 The Authors. European Journal of Neuroscience published by Federation of European Neuroscience Societies and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.

                History
                : 13 August 2018
                : 30 November 2018
                : 07 January 2019
                Page count
                Figures: 2, Tables: 1, Pages: 18, Words: 14256
                Funding
                Funded by: National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders , open-funder-registry 10.13039/100000055;
                Award ID: U01DC016686
                Funded by: FP7 Ideas: European Research Council , open-funder-registry 10.13039/100011199;
                Award ID: ERC‐Adv 320708
                Categories
                Review Article
                Behavioural Neuroscience
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                September 2019
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:5.7.1 mode:remove_FC converted:12.11.2019

                Neurosciences
                electrophysiology,functional magnetic resonance imaging,human,non‐human primates

                Comments

                Comment on this article