1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Efficacy and safety of Tripterygium glycosides as an add-on treatment in adults with chronic urticaria: a systematic review and meta-analysis

      review-article
      , ,
      Pharmaceutical Biology
      Taylor & Francis
      Randomized controlled trials, traditional Chinese medicine, effectiveness, adverse event

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Context

          Tripterygium glycosides (TG), a traditional Chinese medicine, has been used to treat chronic urticaria (CU) in China, and the evidence of TG for CU needs to be updated thoroughly.

          Objective

          To systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of TG combined with H1-antihistamine (H1-AH) in adults with CU.

          Methods

          Eligible randomized controlled trials were searched in eight databases until May 31, 2022, including CNKI, WanFang, VIP, SinoMed, PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science. The search terms included urticaria, Tripterygium, Lei Gong Teng, and Leigongteng. Rev Man 5.3 and Stata 12.0 were used for statistical analysis.

          Results

          A total of 27 studies with 2788 patients were included. The pooled results showed that TG plus H1-AH was superior to H1-AH alone in cure rate (RR = 1.37, 95% CI = 1.15 to 1.63, p = 0.0003), total efficacy rate (RR = 1.40, 95% CI = 1.30 to 1.50, p < 0.00001), pruritus (MD = −0.32, 95% CI = −0.54 to −0.11, p = 0.003), wheal number (MD = −0.31, 95% CI = −0.55 to −0.07, p = 0.01), wheal size (MD = −0.32, 95% CI = −0.46 to −0.19, p < 0.00001), and the serum level of immunoglobulin E (SMD = −1.39, 95% CI = −2.42 to −0.36, p = 0.008). Moreover, adverse events between two groups were mild, and their incidences were not significantly different.

          Conclusions

          The combination of TG and H1-AH is a promising and safe treatment for adults with refractory CU. Further high-quality studies are needed to confirm the evidence.

          Related collections

          Most cited references62

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews

          The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement, published in 2009, was designed to help systematic reviewers transparently report why the review was done, what the authors did, and what they found. Over the past decade, advances in systematic review methodology and terminology have necessitated an update to the guideline. The PRISMA 2020 statement replaces the 2009 statement and includes new reporting guidance that reflects advances in methods to identify, select, appraise, and synthesise studies. The structure and presentation of the items have been modified to facilitate implementation. In this article, we present the PRISMA 2020 27-item checklist, an expanded checklist that details reporting recommendations for each item, the PRISMA 2020 abstract checklist, and the revised flow diagrams for original and updated reviews.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials

            Flaws in the design, conduct, analysis, and reporting of randomised trials can cause the effect of an intervention to be underestimated or overestimated. The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias aims to make the process clearer and more accurate
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found
              Is Open Access

              The international EAACI/GA²LEN/EuroGuiDerm/APAAACI guideline for the definition, classification, diagnosis, and management of urticaria

              This update and revision of the international guideline for urticaria was developed following the methods recommended by Cochrane and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) working group. It is a joint initiative of the Dermatology Section of the European Academy of Allergology and Clinical Immunology (EAACI), the Global Allergy and Asthma European Network (GA²LEN) and its Urticaria and Angioedema Centers of Reference and Excellence (UCAREs and ACAREs), the European Dermatology Forum (EDF; EuroGuiDerm), and the Asia Pacific Association of Allergy, Asthma and Clinical Immunology with the participation of 64 delegates of 50 national and international societies and from 31 countries. The consensus conference was held on 3 December 2020. This guideline was acknowledged and accepted by the European Union of Medical Specialists (UEMS). Urticaria is a frequent, mast cell-driven disease that presents with wheals, angioedema, or both. The lifetime prevalence for acute urticaria is approximately 20%. Chronic spontaneous or inducible urticaria is disabling, impairs quality of life, and affects performance at work and school. This updated version of the international guideline for urticaria covers the definition and classification of urticaria and outlines expert-guided and evidence-based diagnostic and therapeutic approaches for the different subtypes of urticaria.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Pharm Biol
                Pharm Biol
                Pharmaceutical Biology
                Taylor & Francis
                1388-0209
                1744-5116
                24 January 2023
                2023
                24 January 2023
                : 61
                : 1
                : 324-336
                Affiliations
                Department of Dermatology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University , Beijing, China
                Author notes
                CONTACT Ming Li ming1342793374@ 123456126.com Department of Dermatology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University , 100050, Beijing, China
                Article
                2169468
                10.1080/13880209.2023.2169468
                9879204
                36694954
                93249c82-8626-48a1-bdd5-f8dee912607c
                © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                Page count
                Figures: 12, Tables: 1, Pages: 13, Words: 7838
                Categories
                Review
                Review

                randomized controlled trials,traditional chinese medicine,effectiveness,adverse event

                Comments

                Comment on this article