40
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Physician experiences and preferences in the treatment of HR+/HER2− metastatic breast cancer in the United States: a physician survey

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Sequential endocrine therapy ( ET) is recommended for postmenopausal women with hormone receptor‐positive ( HR+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2‐negative ( HER2−) metastatic breast cancer ( mBC) and without visceral symptoms. Chemotherapy ( CT) can be considered after sequential ETs, but is associated with adverse side effects. We assessed physicians' preferences and self‐reported prescribing patterns for ET and CT in the treatment of HR+/ HER2− mBC at community practices in the United States. Community‐based oncologists/hematologists from a nationwide online panel who treated postmenopausal women with HR+/ HER2− mBC were invited to complete a survey, blinded to the identity of study sponsor. Treatment preferences were collected by treatment class of ET‐based regimens versus CT and by agent for postmenopausal HR+/ HER2− mBC patients after prior nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor use in the adjuvant or mBC setting. Among 213 physicians who completed the survey, 78% were male, 71% were based in small/intermediate practices (2–9 oncologists/subspecialists), 55% had >10 years of experience, and 58% referred to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Guidelines when treating mBC. Among first‐line ETs, anastrozole was the most frequently used treatment (35%), followed by everolimus‐based ( EVE, 34%) and fulvestrant‐based ( FUL, 15%) therapy. After first‐line ET, the most preferred second‐ and third‐line treatments were ET monotherapy (48% and 39%), ET combination therapy (31% and 19%), and CT monotherapy (13% and 30%). Comparing EVE versus FUL, physicians preferred EVE in all lines but first line. Efficacy was the most important consideration for treatment choice. Physicians prescribed CT in early lines mainly because of visceral symptoms. This survey of treatment patterns for HR+/ HER2− mBC in community practice suggested that after first‐line ET, ET mono‐ or combination therapy was commonly used for the second‐ and third‐line treatments and CT monotherapy for third‐ or later line treatments. CTs were used in early lines for patients with visceral symptoms.

          Related collections

          Most cited references28

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Extending survival with chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer.

          Metastatic breast cancer (MBC) remains essentially incurable, and goals of therapy include the palliation of symptoms, delay of disease progression, and prolongation of overall survival time without negatively impacting quality of life. Anthracycline and taxane-based therapies have traditionally shown the highest degree of activity in MBC. Though numerous randomized clinical trials have shown improvements in overall response rates, few have found clear survival benefits. In recent years, however, there has been a small but growing series of clinical trials demonstrating modest, but meaningful survival advantages in metastatic disease. A common feature in many of these trials has been the use of a taxane, and more recently, a taxane combined with an antimetabolite. In addition, the development of targeted biologic agents active against MBC, such as trastuzumab and bevacizumab, has demonstrated great potential for enhancing the effects of chemotherapy and producing meaningful survival improvements. The role of the taxanes, antimetabolites, and biologics in extending survival in MBC is discussed.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Long-term follow-up of patients with complete remission following combination chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer.

            To determine the long-term clinical course of patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) who achieved a complete remission with doxorubicin-alkylating agent-containing combination chemotherapy programs. To assess the long-term prognosis of MBC, we reviewed our experience with 1,581 patients treated on consecutive doxorubicin and alkylating agent-containing front-line treatment protocols between 1973 and 1982. Treatment was administered for a maximum duration of 2 years. Characteristics of long-term survivors were evaluated, and hazard rates for progression were calculated. From this group, 263 (16.6%) achieved complete responses (CR) and 49 (3.1%) remained in CR for more than 5 years. After a median duration of 191 months, 26 patients remain in first CR, four patients died in CR at times ranging from 118 to 234 months, 18 patients died of breast cancer, and one is alive with metastatic disease. Compared with the overall CR and total patient populations, the long-term CR group had more premenopausal patients, a younger median age, a lower tumor burden, and better performance status. The hazard function shows a substantial drop in risk of progression after approximately 3 years from initiation of therapy. Ten long-term CR patients developed second primary cancers: breast (3), ovary (2), pancreas (1), endometrium (1), colon (1), head and neck (1), and lung (1). Most patients with MBC treated with systemic therapies have only temporary responses to treatment, but some patients continue in CR following initial treatment. These data show that a small percentage of patients achieve long-term remissions with standard chemotherapy regimens. Remission consolidation strategies are needed.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Problems in recruiting community-based physicians for health services research.

              To qualitatively determine factors that are associated with higher participation rates in community-based health services research requiring significant physician participation burden. A review of the literature was undertaken using MEDLINE and the Social Science Research Index to identify health services research studies that recruited large community-based samples of individual physicians and in which the participation burden exceeded that of merely completing a survey. Two reviewers abstracted data on the recruitment methods, and first authors were contacted to supplement published information. Sixteen studies were identified with participation rates from 2.5% to 91%. Almost all studies used physician recruiters to personally contact potential participants. Recruiters often knew some of the physicians to be recruited, and personal contact with these "known" physicians resulted in greater participation rates. Incentives were generally absent or modest, and at modest levels, did not appear to affect participation rates. Investigators were almost always affiliated with academic institutions, but were divided as to whether this helped or hindered recruitment. HMO-based and minority physicians were more difficult to recruit. Potential participants most often cited time pressures on staff and themselves as the study burden that caused them to decline. Physician personal contact and friendship networks are powerful tools for recruitment. Participation rates might improve by including HMO and minority physicians in the recruitment process. Investigators should transfer as much of the study burden from participating physicians to project staff as possible.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Cancer Med
                Cancer Med
                10.1002/(ISSN)2045-7634
                CAM4
                Cancer Medicine
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                2045-7634
                21 December 2015
                February 2016
                : 5
                : 2 ( doiID: 10.1002/cam4.2016.5.issue-2 )
                : 209-220
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ]Analysis Group, Inc. Boston Massachusetts
                [ 2 ]Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation East Hanover New Jersey
                [ 3 ]Analysis Group, Inc. New York New York
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                Jipan Xie, Analysis Group, 10 Rockefeller Plaza, 15th Floor, New York, NY 10020‐1903. Tel: 212‐492‐8158; Fax: 212‐492‐8188; E‐mail: Jipan.Xie@ 123456analysisgroup.com

                Article
                CAM4580
                10.1002/cam4.580
                4735772
                26686532
                935ddecf-4548-4fd5-baf3-d738f0c6437f
                © 2015 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 11 June 2015
                : 09 October 2015
                : 12 October 2015
                Page count
                Pages: 12
                Funding
                Funded by: Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation
                Categories
                Original Research
                Clinical Cancer Research
                Original Research
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                cam4580
                February 2016
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_NLMPMC version:4.7.6 mode:remove_FC converted:02.02.2016

                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                chemotherapy,endocrine therapy,everolimus,fulvestrant,metastatic breast cancer,survey

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_

                Similar content253

                Cited by3

                Most referenced authors393