8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Attentional bias in Internet users with problematic use of social networking sites

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background and aims

          Evidence from the field of addictive disorders suggests that attentional bias for stimuli related to a substance or activity of abuse (e.g., gambling) exacerbates the addictive behavior. However, evidence regarding attentional bias in PIU is sparse. This study aims to investigate whether individuals who express problematic tendencies toward social networking sites (SNS), a subtype of PIU, show attentional bias for stimuli associated with social media.

          Methods

          Sixty-five participants performed Visual Dot-Probe and Pleasantness Rating Tasks containing SNS-related and matched control images during eye movements were recorded, providing a direct measure of attention. Participants were assessed on their levels of SNS Internet use (ranging from problematic to non-problematic) and their levels of urges to be online (high vs. low).

          Results

          Problematic SNS users and, in particular, a subgroup expressing higher levels of urges to be online showed an attentional bias for SNS-related images compared to control images.

          Conclusion

          These results suggest that attentional bias is a common mechanism associated with problematic Internet use as well as other addictive disorders.

          Related collections

          Most cited references35

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          A cognitive-behavioral model of pathological Internet use

          R.A. Davis (2001)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Attentional bias in emotional disorders.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The neural basis of drug craving: an incentive-sensitization theory of addiction.

              This paper presents a biopsychological theory of drug addiction, the 'Incentive-Sensitization Theory'. The theory addresses three fundamental questions. The first is: why do addicts crave drugs? That is, what is the psychological and neurobiological basis of drug craving? The second is: why does drug craving persist even after long periods of abstinence? The third is whether 'wanting' drugs (drug craving) is attributable to 'liking' drugs (to the subjective pleasurable effects of drugs)? The theory posits the following. (1) Addictive drugs share the ability to enhance mesotelencephalic dopamine neurotransmission. (2) One psychological function of this neural system is to attribute 'incentive salience' to the perception and mental representation of events associated with activation of the system. Incentive salience is a psychological process that transforms the perception of stimuli, imbuing them with salience, making them attractive, 'wanted', incentive stimuli. (3) In some individuals the repeated use of addictive drugs produces incremental neuroadaptations in this neural system, rendering it increasingly and perhaps permanently, hypersensitive ('sensitized') to drugs and drug-associated stimuli. The sensitization of dopamine systems is gated by associative learning, which causes excessive incentive salience to be attributed to the act of drug taking and to stimuli associated with drug taking. It is specifically the sensitization of incentive salience, therefore, that transforms ordinary 'wanting' into excessive drug craving. (4) It is further proposed that sensitization of the neural systems responsible for incentive salience ('for wanting') can occur independently of changes in neural systems that mediate the subjective pleasurable effects of drugs (drug 'liking') and of neural systems that mediate withdrawal. Thus, sensitization of incentive salience can produce addictive behavior (compulsive drug seeking and drug taking) even if the expectation of drug pleasure or the aversive properties of withdrawal are diminished and even in the face of strong disincentives, including the loss of reputation, job, home and family. We review evidence for this view of addiction and discuss its implications for understanding the psychology and neurobiology of addiction.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Behav Addict
                J Behav Addict
                jba
                JBA
                Journal of Behavioral Addictions
                Akadémiai Kiadó (Budapest )
                2062-5871
                2063-5303
                2 December 2019
                December 2019
                : 8
                : 4
                : 733-742
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Psychology, University of Bath , Bath, UK
                Author notes
                [* ]Corresponding author: Maria Nikolaidou, PhD; Department of Psychology, University of Bath, 10 West, Bath BA2 7AY, UK; Phone: +44 1225 38 4233; E-mail: mn325@ 123456bath.ac.uk
                Article
                10.1556/2006.8.2019.60
                7044579
                31786935
                93710f49-0875-4968-9c48-833389a2534d
                © 2019 The Author(s)

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium for non-commercial purposes, provided the original author and source are credited, a link to the CC License is provided, and changes – if any – are indicated.

                History
                : 24 June 2019
                : 18 September 2019
                : 20 October 2019
                Page count
                Figures: 6, Tables: 2, Equations: 0, References: 41, Pages: 10
                Funding
                Funding sources: This study was funded by the University of Bath.
                Categories
                Full-Length Report

                social networking sites,problematic internet use,attentional bias,urges to be online

                Comments

                Comment on this article