10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Energy allocation and behaviour in the growing broiler chicken

      research-article
      1 , 2 , 3 ,
      Scientific Reports
      Nature Publishing Group UK

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Broiler chickens are increasingly at the forefront of global meat production but the consequences of fast growth and selection for an increase in body mass on bird health are an ongoing concern for industry and consumers. To better understand the implications of selection we evaluated energetics and behaviour over the 6-week hatch-to-slaughter developmental period in a commercial broiler. The effect of posture on resting metabolic rate becomes increasingly significant as broilers grow, as standing became more energetically expensive than sitting. The proportion of overall metabolic rate accounted for by locomotor behaviour decreased over development, corresponding to declining activity levels, mean and peak walking speeds. These data are consistent with the inference that broilers allocate energy to activity within a constrained metabolic budget and that there is a reducing metabolic scope for exercise throughout their development. Comparison with similarly sized galliforms reveals that locomotion is relatively energetically expensive in broilers.

          Related collections

          Most cited references70

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          segmented: an R package to fit regression models with broken-line relationships

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            A Re-Examination of the Relation between Standard Metabolic Rate and Body Weight in Birds

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found
              Is Open Access

              Carcass composition and yield of 1957 versus 2001 broilers when fed representative 1957 and 2001 broiler diets.

              The yield of carcass parts as well as levels of carcass fat, moisture, and ash were measured in the 1957 Athens-Canadian Randombred Control (ACRBC) and in the Ross 308 commercial broiler, when fed diets that were representative of those being fed during 1957 and 2001. The Ross 308 was used to represent 2001 commercial broilers. Comparisons of carcass weights of the Ross 308 on the 2001 diet versus the ACRBC on the 1957 diet showed they were 6.0, 5.9, 5.2, and 4.6 times heavier than the ACRBC at 43, 57, 71, and 85 d of age, respectively. Yields of hot carcass without giblets (fat pad included) were 12.3, 13.6, 12.2, and 11.1 percentage points higher for the Ross 308 than for the ACRBC at those ages. The yields of total breast meat for the Ross 308 were 20.0, 21.3, 21.9, and 22.2% and were 8.4, 9.9, 10.3, and 9.8 percentage points higher than for the ACRBC at those ages. Yields of saddle and legs for the Ross 308 broiler were approximately 31 to 32% over the four ages and were about 1.5 to 2% higher than for the ACRBC at the different ages. The Ross 308 averaged 13.7, 15.0, 18.6, and 18.5% whole carcass fat versus 8.5, 10.6, 12.7, and 14.0% for the ACRBC at the four ages. In conjunction with previous studies, the current data show that yield of broiler carcass parts has continued to increase over time and that genetics has been the major contributor to changes in yield.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                jonathan.codd@manchester.ac.uk
                Journal
                Sci Rep
                Sci Rep
                Scientific Reports
                Nature Publishing Group UK (London )
                2045-2322
                14 March 2018
                14 March 2018
                2018
                : 8
                : 4562
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1936 8403, GRID grid.9909.9, School of Biomedical Sciences, , Faculty of Biological Sciences, University of Leeds, ; Leeds, UK
                [2 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0425 573X, GRID grid.20931.39, Department of Comparative Biomedical Sciences, , Structure and Motion Laboratory, Royal Veterinary College, ; London, UK
                [3 ]ISNI 0000000121662407, GRID grid.5379.8, School of Biological Sciences, , Faculty of Biology, Medicine & Health, University of Manchester, ; Manchester, UK
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6767-7038
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0211-1786
                Article
                22604
                10.1038/s41598-018-22604-2
                5852157
                29540782
                93843da2-7e46-4c53-b154-bf01648b6a84
                © The Author(s) 2018

                Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 2 November 2017
                : 15 February 2018
                Categories
                Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2018

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article