Recommendations for Conduct, Methodological Practices, and Reporting of Cost-effectiveness Analyses

There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

Abstract

Since publication of the report by the Panel on Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine in 1996, researchers have advanced the methods of cost-effectiveness analysis, and policy makers have experimented with its application. The need to deliver health care efficiently and the importance of using analytic techniques to understand the clinical and economic consequences of strategies to improve health have increased in recent years.

Related collections

Author and article information

Journal

Title: JAMA

Abbreviated Title: JAMA

Publisher: American Medical Association (AMA)

ISSN (Print): 0098-7484

Publication date Created: September 13 2016

Publication date (Print): September 13 2016

Volume: 316

Issue: 10

Page: 1093

Affiliations

[1 ]Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina

[2 ]Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts

[3 ]Pharmaceutical Outcomes Research and Policy Program, Department of Pharmacy, and Departments of Health Services and Economics, University of Washington, Seattle

[4 ]Division of Medical Ethics, Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts

[5 ]Department of Economics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

[6 ]Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada7Toronto Health Economics and Technology Assessment Collaborative, Toronto General Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada8Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

[7 ]Division of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis

[8 ]Departments of Medicine and Economics, Harris School of Public Policy Studies, and Center for Health and the Social Sciences, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois

[9 ]VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California12Center for Health Policy/Center for Primary Care and Outcomes Research, Stanford University, Stanford, California

[10 ]Child Health Evaluation and Research Unit, Department of Pediatrics and Communicable Diseases, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor14Department of Health Management and Policy, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor

[11 ]Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts

[12 ]Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, England

[13 ]Department of Health Services, Policy and Practice, School of Public Health, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island

[14 ]Department of Economics and Institute for Health, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey

[15 ]Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute, Washington, DC

[16 ]Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, Florida

Article

DOI: 10.1001/jama.2016.12195

PubMed ID: 27623463

SO-VID: 93950f31-6631-4ee6-9845-ebc4615bcc63

History

Data availability:

Comments

Comment on this article

Cited by 1,241

See all cited by

- Version 1

Recommendations for Conduct, Methodological Practices, and Reporting of Cost-effectiveness Analyses : Second Panel on Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine

Read this article at