47
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      How to measure, report and verify soil carbon change to realize the potential of soil carbon sequestration for atmospheric greenhouse gas removal

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          There is growing international interest in better managing soils to increase soil organic carbon (SOC) content to contribute to climate change mitigation, to enhance resilience to climate change and to underpin food security, through initiatives such as international ‘4p1000’ initiative and the FAO's Global assessment of SOC sequestration potential (GSOCseq) programme. Since SOC content of soils cannot be easily measured, a key barrier to implementing programmes to increase SOC at large scale, is the need for credible and reliable measurement/monitoring, reporting and verification (MRV) platforms, both for national reporting and for emissions trading. Without such platforms, investments could be considered risky. In this paper, we review methods and challenges of measuring SOC change directly in soils, before examining some recent novel developments that show promise for quantifying SOC. We describe how repeat soil surveys are used to estimate changes in SOC over time, and how long‐term experiments and space‐for‐time substitution sites can serve as sources of knowledge and can be used to test models, and as potential benchmark sites in global frameworks to estimate SOC change. We briefly consider models that can be used to simulate and project change in SOC and examine the MRV platforms for SOC change already in use in various countries/regions. In the final section, we bring together the various components described in this review, to describe a new vision for a global framework for MRV of SOC change, to support national and international initiatives seeking to effect change in the way we manage our soils.

          Abstract

          Since soil organic carbon (SOC) changes are difficult to measure, a key barrier to implementing programmes to increase SOC is the need for credible and reliable measurement/monitoring, reporting and verification (MRV) platforms. We review methods for measuring SOC change directly in soils, examine novel developments for quantifying SOC change and describe how surveys, long‐term experiments and chronosequences can be used for testing models and as benchmark sites in global frameworks to estimate SOC change. We review MRV platforms for soil organic carbon change already in use and describe a new vision for a global framework for MRV of SOC change.

          Related collections

          Most cited references170

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The Microbial Efficiency-Matrix Stabilization (MEMS) framework integrates plant litter decomposition with soil organic matter stabilization: do labile plant inputs form stable soil organic matter?

          The decomposition and transformation of above- and below-ground plant detritus (litter) is the main process by which soil organic matter (SOM) is formed. Yet, research on litter decay and SOM formation has been largely uncoupled, failing to provide an effective nexus between these two fundamental processes for carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) cycling and storage. We present the current understanding of the importance of microbial substrate use efficiency and C and N allocation in controlling the proportion of plant-derived C and N that is incorporated into SOM, and of soil matrix interactions in controlling SOM stabilization. We synthesize this understanding into the Microbial Efficiency-Matrix Stabilization (MEMS) framework. This framework leads to the hypothesis that labile plant constituents are the dominant source of microbial products, relative to input rates, because they are utilized more efficiently by microbes. These microbial products of decomposition would thus become the main precursors of stable SOM by promoting aggregation and through strong chemical bonding to the mineral soil matrix. © 2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Climate-smart soils.

            Soils are integral to the function of all terrestrial ecosystems and to food and fibre production. An overlooked aspect of soils is their potential to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions. Although proven practices exist, the implementation of soil-based greenhouse gas mitigation activities are at an early stage and accurately quantifying emissions and reductions remains a substantial challenge. Emerging research and information technology developments provide the potential for a broader inclusion of soils in greenhouse gas policies. Here we highlight 'state of the art' soil greenhouse gas research, summarize mitigation practices and potentials, identify gaps in data and understanding and suggest ways to close such gaps through new research, technology and collaboration.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              On digital soil mapping

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                pete.smith@abdn.ac.uk
                Journal
                Glob Chang Biol
                Glob Chang Biol
                10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2486
                GCB
                Global Change Biology
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                1354-1013
                1365-2486
                06 October 2019
                January 2020
                : 26
                : 1 ( doiID: 10.1111/gcb.v26.1 )
                : 219-241
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Institute of Biological & Environmental Sciences University of Aberdeen Aberdeen UK
                [ 2 ] INRA Paris Cedex 07 France
                [ 3 ] Agriculture and Agri‐Food Canada Quebec QC Canada
                [ 4 ] Environmental Research Institute University of Waikato Hamilton New Zealand
                [ 5 ] INRA, AgroParisTech. Thiverval‐Grignon France
                [ 6 ] Norwegian Institute of Bioeconomy Research (NIBIO) Ås Norway
                [ 7 ] ISRIC – World Soil Information Wageningen The Netherlands
                [ 8 ] Manaaki Whenua – Landcare Research Lincoln New Zealand
                [ 9 ] Department of Agroecology Aarhus University Tjele Denmark
                [ 10 ] International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT) Cali Colombia
                [ 11 ] Agri‐Food and Biosciences Institute Belfast UK
                [ 12 ] CGIAR CCAFS Programme University of Vermont (UVM) Burlington VT USA
                [ 13 ] Soil and Water Department Spanish National Research Council (CSIC) Zaragoza Spain
                [ 14 ] Research Center for the Management of Environmental and Agricultural Risks (CEIGRAM) Universidad Politécnica de Madrid Madrid Spain
                [ 15 ] INRA VetAgro‐Sup UCA Clermont Ferrand France
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                Pete Smith, Institute of Biological & Environmental Sciences, University of Aberdeen, 23 St Machar Drive, Aberdeen AB24 3UU, UK.

                Email: pete.smith@ 123456abdn.ac.uk

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3784-1124
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9899-1276
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5977-3863
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5125-4962
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5381-0803
                Article
                GCB14815
                10.1111/gcb.14815
                6973036
                31469216
                93e6298c-affd-49f6-945b-2ecd2af06270
                © 2019 The Authors. Global Change Biology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 13 July 2019
                : 22 August 2019
                Page count
                Figures: 3, Tables: 4, Pages: 23, Words: 20330
                Funding
                Funded by: AGRISOST‐CM
                Award ID: S2018/BAA‐4330
                Funded by: Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad
                Award ID: AGL2017‐84529‐C3‐1‐R
                Funded by: NUEVA
                Funded by: Global Research Alliance on Agricultural Greenhouse Gases
                Funded by: REMEDIA
                Funded by: Danish Ministry of Climate, Energy and Utilities , open-funder-registry 10.13039/100010436;
                Award ID: SINKS2
                Funded by: New Zealand Agricultural Greenhouse Gas Research Centre , open-funder-registry 10.13039/501100009482;
                Funded by: European Union , open-funder-registry 10.13039/501100007601;
                Award ID: 774378
                Funded by: DEVIL
                Award ID: NE/M021327/1
                Funded by: Soils‐R‐GRREAT
                Award ID: NE/P019455/1
                Funded by: CGIAR Trust Fund
                Funded by: UKERC , open-funder-registry 10.13039/501100000326;
                Categories
                Invited Research Review
                Invited Research Reviews
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                January 2020
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:5.7.5 mode:remove_FC converted:21.01.2020

                measurement,monitoring,mrv,reporting,soil organic carbon,soil organic matter,verification

                Comments

                Comment on this article