37
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Cognitive Distraction at Mealtime Decreases Amount Consumed in Healthy Young Adults: A Randomized Crossover Exploratory Study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          ABSTRACT

          Background

          Environmental distractions have been shown to affect eating patterns.

          Objective

          The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of a cognitive distraction on amount, preference, and memory of food consumed and perceptions of fullness, hunger, and enjoyment of food in a healthy young-adult population.

          Methods

          A randomized controlled crossover study of 119 healthy adults (20.2 ± 1.4 y; 57% women; 48% white) assigned participants to begin under either the distracted (DIS, n = 55) or control (CON, n = 64) conditions. DIS participants consumed a meal of quiche while completing a Rapid Visual Information Processing (RVIP) for 15 min. CON participants ate without any task assignment. After a 30-min rest period, participants were offered a snack and given 5 min to eat ad libitum. Participants completed a survey assessing fullness, hunger, and enjoyment of the meal using 100 mm visual analogue scales. One week later, participants completed the opposite condition. Data were analyzed using ANOVA.

          Results

          Those in DIS consumed 13 g less of the meal ( P < 0.001), even when comparing by initial condition ( P < 0.001) and adjusting for sex ( P < 0.001). A carryover effect of initial condition was found ( P < 0.001), such that participants first assigned to DIS condition consumed less (95.2 ± 61.7 g) when distracted compared to all other condition combinations (127–133 g). Those in DIS had decreased accuracy for both memory of quiche received (absolute difference, 1.1 ± 1.6 compared with 0.7 ± 1.2 for CON, P < 0.001) and memory of quiche consumed (0.8 ± 1.1 for DIS compared with 0.7 ± 1.2 for CON, P = 0.007).

          Conclusions

          When distracted, healthy young adults consumed significantly less food and their memory of the meal was dampened. These findings underscore the potential importance of cognitive distraction in affecting food intake. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT04078607.

          Related collections

          Most cited references19

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Effect of peptide YY3-36 on food intake in humans.

          Studies in animals and humans suggest a role for peptide YY (PYY3-36) in regulating satiety. The physiologic role of PYY3-36, however, has not been investigated in detail. The present study was designed to examine PYY release in response to 2 meals differing in their calorie content and to relate the plasma levels to those obtained after exogenous infusion. In a second step, the effect of graded intravenous doses (0, 0.2, 0.4, and 0.8 pmol.kg(-1).min(-1)) of synthetic human PYY3-36 on food intake was investigated in healthy male volunteers in a double-blind, placebo-controlled fashion. Plasma PYY concentrations increased in response to food intake reflecting the size of the calorie load. Graded PYY3-36 infusions resulted in a dose-dependent reduction in food intake (maximal inhibition, 35%; P < .001 vs control) and a similar reduction in calorie intake (32%; P < .001). Fluid ingestion was also reduced by PYY (18% reduction; P < .01). Nausea and fullness were the most common side effects produced by PYY, especially at the highest dose. Furthermore, subjects experienced less hunger and early fullness in the premeal period during PYY3-36 infusion at the highest dose (P < .05). This study shows that intravenous infusions of PYY3-36 decrease spontaneous food intake; the inhibition is, however, only significant at pharmacologic plasma concentrations. Whether PYY3-36 has a physiologic role in the regulation of satiety in humans remains to be defined.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            What Causes Humans to Begin and End a Meal? A Role for Memory for What Has Been Eaten, as Evidenced by a Study of Multiple Meal Eating in Amnesic Patients

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Playing a computer game during lunch affects fullness, memory for lunch, and later snack intake.

              The presence of distracting stimuli during eating increases the meal size and could thereby contribute to overeating and obesity. However, the effects of within-meal distraction on later food intake are less clear. We sought to test the hypothesis that distraction inhibits memory encoding for a meal, which, in turn, increases later food intake. The current study assessed the effects of playing solitaire (a computerized card-sorting game) during a fixed lunch, which was eaten at a fixed rate, on memory for lunch and food intake in a taste test 30 min later. A between-subjects design was used with 44 participants. Participants in the no-distraction group ate the same lunch in the absence of any distracting stimuli. Distracted individuals were less full after lunch, and they ate significantly more biscuits in the taste test than did nondistracted participants (mean intake: 52.1 compared with 27.1 g; P = 0.017). Furthermore, serial-order memory for the presentation of the 9 lunch items was less accurate in participants who had been distracted during lunch. These findings provide further evidence that distraction during one meal has the capacity to influence subsequent eating. They may also help to explain the well-documented association between sedentary screen-time activities and overweight.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Nutr
                J. Nutr
                jn
                The Journal of Nutrition
                Oxford University Press
                0022-3166
                1541-6100
                May 2020
                14 February 2020
                14 February 2020
                : 150
                : 5
                : 1324-1329
                Affiliations
                [1] Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign , IL, USA
                Author notes
                Address correspondence to SMN-R (e-mail: nickrich@ 123456illinois.edu ).
                Present address for CAL: Department of Health and Physical Activity, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Present address for CJN: Institute for Research and Education to Advance Community Health, Washington State University, Seattle, WA, USA
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3462-9790
                Article
                nxaa022
                10.1093/jn/nxaa022
                7198308
                32060552
                93ff40ec-949a-4e8b-a5bd-64d245d3d1e1
                Copyright © The Author(s) 2020.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@ 123456oup.com

                History
                : 08 September 2019
                : 17 December 2019
                : 27 January 2020
                Page count
                Pages: 6
                Categories
                Ingestive Behavior and Neurosciences
                AcademicSubjects/MED00060
                AcademicSubjects/SCI00960

                Nutrition & Dietetics
                distraction,eating behavior,fullness,hunger,ingestive behavior,rapid visual information processing

                Comments

                Comment on this article