5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The sanctity of life: The role of purity in attitudes towards abortion and euthanasia

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Although abortion and euthanasia are highly contested issues at the heart of the culture war, the moral foundations underlying ideological differences on these issues are mostly unknown. Given that much of the extant debate is framed around the sanctity of life, we argued that the moral foundation of purity/sanctity—a core moral belief that emphasises adherence to the “natural order”—would mediate the negative relationship between conservatism and support for abortion and euthanasia. As hypothesised, results from a nation‐wide random sample of adults in New Zealand ( N = 3360) revealed that purity/sanctity mediated the relationship between conservatism and opposition to both policies. These results demonstrate that, rather than being motivated by a desire to reduce harm, conservative opposition to pro‐choice and end‐of‐life decisions is (partly) based on the view that ending a life, even if it is one's own, violates God's natural design and, thus, stains one's spiritual purity.

          Related collections

          Most cited references81

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          When Morality Opposes Justice: Conservatives Have Moral Intuitions that Liberals may not Recognize

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Mapping the moral domain.

            The moral domain is broader than the empathy and justice concerns assessed by existing measures of moral competence, and it is not just a subset of the values assessed by value inventories. To fill the need for reliable and theoretically grounded measurement of the full range of moral concerns, we developed the Moral Foundations Questionnaire on the basis of a theoretical model of 5 universally available (but variably developed) sets of moral intuitions: Harm/Care, Fairness/Reciprocity, Ingroup/Loyalty, Authority/Respect, and Purity/Sanctity. We present evidence for the internal and external validity of the scale and the model, and in doing so we present new findings about morality: (a) Comparative model fitting of confirmatory factor analyses provides empirical justification for a 5-factor structure of moral concerns; (b) convergent/discriminant validity evidence suggests that moral concerns predict personality features and social group attitudes not previously considered morally relevant; and (c) we establish pragmatic validity of the measure in providing new knowledge and research opportunities concerning demographic and cultural differences in moral intuitions. These analyses provide evidence for the usefulness of Moral Foundations Theory in simultaneously increasing the scope and sharpening the resolution of psychological views of morality.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Psychological entitlement: interpersonal consequences and validation of a self-report measure.

              Nine studies were conducted with the goal of developing a self-report measure of psychological entitlement and assessing its interpersonal consequences. The Psychological Entitlement Scale (PES) was found to be reliable and valid (Study 1, 2), not associated with social desirability (Study 2), stable across time (Study 3), and correlated negatively with two of the Big Five factors: agreeableness and emotional stability (Study 4). The validity of the PES was confirmed in studies that assessed willingness to take candy designated for children (Study 5) and reported deservingness of pay in a hypothetical employment setting (Study 6). Finally, the PES was linked to important interpersonal consequences including competitive choices in a commons dilemma (Study 7), selfish approaches to romantic relationships (Study 8), and aggression following ego threat (Study 9). Psychological entitlement has a pervasive and largely unconstructive impact on social behavior.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                c.lockhart@auckland.ac.nz
                Journal
                Int J Psychol
                Int J Psychol
                10.1002/(ISSN)1464-066X
                IJOP
                International Journal of Psychology
                John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. (Oxford, UK )
                0020-7594
                1464-066X
                13 September 2022
                February 2023
                : 58
                : 1 ( doiID: 10.1002/ijop.v58.1 )
                : 16-29
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] School of Psychology University of Auckland Auckland New Zealand
                Author notes
                [*] [* ]Correspondence should be addressed to Christopher Lockhart, School of Psychology, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland 1142, New Zealand. (E‐mail: c.lockhart@ 123456auckland.ac.nz ).
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1713-7957
                Article
                IJOP12877
                10.1002/ijop.12877
                10086843
                36097848
                942bbac0-c1a6-4c15-8a1e-58691e67778e
                © 2022 The Authors. International Journal of Psychology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Union of Psychological Science.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.

                History
                : 17 November 2021
                : 22 August 2022
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 3, Pages: 14, Words: 8798
                Funding
                Funded by: Performance Based Research Fund
                Funded by: Templeton Religion Trust , doi 10.13039/501100013437;
                Award ID: TRT0196
                Categories
                Regular Empirical Article
                Regular Empirical Articles
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                February 2023
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:6.2.7 mode:remove_FC converted:11.04.2023

                abortion,conservatism,euthanasia,moral foundations theory,purity

                Comments

                Comment on this article