20
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Screening protocols to monitor respiratory status in primary immunodeficiency disease: findings from a European survey and subclinical infection working group

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Summary

          Many patients with primary immunodeficiency (PID) who have antibody deficiency develop progressive lung disease due to underlying subclinical infection and inflammation. To understand how these patients are monitored we conducted a retrospective survey based on patient records of 13 PID centres across Europe, regarding the care of 1061 adult and 178 paediatric patients with PID on immunoglobulin (Ig) G replacement. The most common diagnosis was common variable immunodeficiency in adults (75%) and hypogammaglobulinaemia in children (39%). The frequency of clinic visits varied both within and between centres: every 1–12 months for adult patients and every 3–6 months for paediatric patients. Patients diagnosed with lung diseases were more likely to receive pharmaceutical therapies and received a wider range of therapies than patients without lung disease. Variation existed between centres in the frequency with which some clinical and laboratory monitoring tests are performed, including exercise tests, laboratory testing for IgG subclass levels and specific antibodies, and lung function tests such as spirometry. Some tests were carried out more frequently in adults than in children, probably due to difficulties conducting these tests in younger children. The percentage of patients seen regularly by a chest physician, or who had microbiology tests performed following chest and sinus exacerbations, also varied widely between centres. Our survey revealed a great deal of variation across Europe in how frequently patients with PID visit the clinic and how frequently some monitoring tests are carried out. These results highlight the urgent need for consensus guidelines on how to monitor lung complications in PID patients.

          Related collections

          Most cited references14

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The variable in common variable immunodeficiency: a disease of complex phenotypes.

          Common variable immunodeficiency (CVID) is the most common and clinically most important severe primary antibody deficiency and is characterized by low levels of IgG, IgA, and/or IgM, with a failure to produce specific antibodies. This diagnostic category represents a heterogeneous group of disorders, which present not only with acute and chronic infections but also with a range of inflammatory and autoimmune disorders as well as an increased incidence of lymphoma and other malignancies. Patients can now be categorized into distinct clinical phenotypes based on analysis of large cohort studies and be further stratified by immunologic laboratory testing. The biologic importance of this categorization is made clear by the 11-fold increase in mortality if even one of these phenotypes (cytopenias, lymphoproliferation, or enteropathy) is present. Limited progress in defining the underlying molecular causes has been made with known causative single gene defects accounting for only 3% of cases, and, for this and the reasons mentioned above, CVID remains resolute in its variability. This review provides a practical approach to risk stratification of these complex phenotypes by using current clinical categories and laboratory biomarkers. The effects of infection as well as inflammatory and autoimmune complications on different organ systems are discussed alongside strategies to reduce diagnostic delay. Recent developments in diagnostics and therapy are also explored.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Monitoring cystic fibrosis lung disease by computed tomography. Radiation risk in perspective.

            Computed tomography (CT) is a sensitive technique to monitor structural changes related to cystic fibrosis (CF) lung disease. It detects structural pulmonary abnormalities such as bronchiectasis and trapped air, at an early stage, before they become apparent with other diagnostic tests. Clinical decisions may be influenced by knowledge of these abnormalities. CT imaging, however, comes with risk related to ionizing radiation exposure. The aim of this review is to discuss the risk of routine CT imaging in patients with CF, using current models of radiation-induced cancer, and to put this risk in perspective with other medical and nonmedical risks. The magnitude of the risk is a complex, controversial matter. Risk analyses have largely been based on a linear no-threshold model, and excess relative and excess absolute risk estimates have been derived mainly from atomic bomb survivors. The estimates have large confidence intervals. Our risk estimates are in concordance with previously reported estimates. A large proportion of radiation to which humans are exposed is from natural background sources and varies widely depending on geographical location. The risk differences due to variation in background radiation can be larger than the risks associated with CF lung disease monitoring by CT. We conclude that the risk related to routine usage of CT in clinical care is small. In addition, a life-limiting disease, such as CF, lowers the risk of radiation-induced cancer. Nonetheless, the use of CT should always be justified and the radiation dose should be kept as low as reasonably achievable.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Anaesthesia considerations for cardiac MRI in infants and small children.

              General anaesthesia is frequently necessary in infants and small children undergoing cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), because of the imaging techniques, MRI environment and potential need for breath-holding to facilitate imaging. Anaesthetizing paediatric patients with congenital heart disease (CHD) for cardiac MRI poses many challenges for the anaesthetist and this report reviews our experience. We retrospectively reviewed the anaesthesia and MRI records of all patients who had undergone cardiac MRI between January 2000 and October 2002. A total of 250 children with cardiac disease underwent general anaesthesia for cardiac MRI. ASA classification included class I, 2%; class II; 26%; class III, 60% and class IV, 12%. A total of 168 patients (67%) had undergone previous cardiac surgery, 182 patients (94%) were discharged the same day and 48 patients (19.2%) had cyanotic cardiac defects (SpO2 between 55 and 85%). No scans were interrupted because of low oxygen saturation during breath-hold or haemodynamic instability. No patient was admitted to the hospital from complications related to general anaesthesia, but one inhouse patient from the cardiology ward was admitted to the cardiac intensive care unit (CICU) after the MRI because of cyanosis and low cardiac output. Seven patients from the CICU were on inotropic infusions when they underwent the MRI procedure and two others needed inotropic support after induction of anaesthesia. Five patients had a brief episode of hypotension during the MRI and responded quickly to interventions. Our experience demonstrates that general anaesthesia for cardiac MRI can be provided safely in infants and small children with CHD, despite the complexity and pathophysiology of many defects, the frequent breath-holding for image acquisitions and the MRI environment.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                jollessr@cardiff.ac.uk
                Journal
                Clin Exp Immunol
                Clin. Exp. Immunol
                10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2249
                CEI
                Clinical and Experimental Immunology
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                0009-9104
                1365-2249
                25 August 2017
                November 2017
                25 August 2017
                : 190
                : 2 ( doiID: 10.1111/cei.2017.190.issue-2 )
                : 226-234
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Immunodeficiency Centre for Wales University Hospital of Wales Cardiff UK
                [ 2 ] Department of Immunology and IdISSC Hospital Clínico San Carlos Madrid Spain
                [ 3 ] Department of Molecular Medicine Sapienza University of Rome Italy
                [ 4 ] Pediatric Infectious Diseases and Immunodeficiencies Unit Jeffrey Modell Diagnostic and Research Centre, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Spain
                [ 5 ] Department of Medicine (DIMED), Clinical Immunology Unit University of Padua Italy
                [ 6 ] University Department of Pediatrics, CHR Liege Belgium
                [ 7 ] Respiratory Diseases Department Hôpital FOCH, University Versailles‐St Quentin Suresnes France
                [ 8 ] The Children's Hospital, Skåne University Hospital, Lund Sweden
                [ 9 ] Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust London UK
                [ 10 ] Department of Immunology Barts and The London National Health Service Trust London UK
                [ 11 ] Center for Chronic Immunodeficiency, Medical Center University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg Germany
                [ 12 ] Center for Primary Immunodeficiency, Department of Paediatric Immunology and Pulmonology, Jeffrey Modell Diagnostic and Research Centre Ghent University Hospital Belgium
                [ 13 ] Department of Biomedicine, Immunoallergology Unit AOU Craeggi, University of Florence Italy
                [ 14 ] Jeroen Bosch Academy, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, ’s‐Hertogenbosch the Netherlands
                [ 15 ] Tranzo, Tilburg University Tilburg the Netherlands
                Author notes
                [*] [* ]Correspondence: S. Jolles, Department of Immunology, University Hospital of Wales, Heath Park, Cardiff CF14 4XW, UK. E‐mail: jollessr@ 123456cardiff.ac.uk
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7394-6804
                Article
                CEI13012
                10.1111/cei.13012
                5629444
                28708268
                94510c16-5d55-4b38-9ef4-24859986c5b8
                © 2017 The Authors. Clinical and Experimental Immunology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Society for Immunology

                This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.

                History
                : 16 May 2017
                Page count
                Figures: 5, Tables: 1, Pages: 10, Words: 6130
                Funding
                Funded by: CSL Behring
                Categories
                Original Article
                Original Articles
                Translational
                Immunodeficiency
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                cei13012
                November 2017
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_NLMPMC version:5.2.1 mode:remove_FC converted:06.10.2017

                Immunology
                antibody deficiency,lung disease,monitoring,primary immunodeficiency disease,subclinical infection

                Comments

                Comment on this article