21
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Brief Engagement and Acceptance Coaching for Community and Hospice Settings (the BEACHeS Study): Protocol for the development and pilot testing of an evidence-based psychological intervention to enhance wellbeing and aid transition into palliative care

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Cancer affects millions of individuals globally, with a mortality rate of over eight million people annually. Although palliative care is often provided outside of specialist services, many people require, at some point in their illness journey, support from specialist palliative care services, for example, those provided in hospice settings. This transition can be a time of uncertainty and fear, and there is a need for effective interventions to meet the psychological and supportive care needs of people with cancer that cannot be cured. Whilst Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) has been shown to be effective across diverse health problems, robust evidence for its effectiveness in palliative cancer populations is not extensive.

          Method

          This mixed-methods study uses a single-case experimental design with embedded qualitative interviews to pilot test a novel intervention for this patient group. Between 14 and 20 patients will be recruited from two hospices in England and Scotland. Participants will receive five face-to-face manualised sessions with a psychological therapist. Sessions are structured around teaching core ACT skills (openness, awareness and engagement) as a way to deal effectively with challenges of transition into specialist palliative care services. Outcome measures include cancer-specific quality of life (primary outcome) and distress (secondary outcome), which are assessed alongside measures of psychological flexibility. Daily diary outcome assessments will be taken for key measures, alongside more detailed weekly self-report, through baseline, intervention and 1-month follow-up phases. After follow-up, participants will be invited to take part in a qualitative interview to understand their experience of taking part and acceptability and perceived effectiveness of the intervention and its components.

          Discussion

          This study is the first investigation of using ACT with terminally ill patients at the beginning of their transition into palliative treatment. Using in-depth single-case approaches, we will refine and manualise intervention content by the close of the study for use in follow-up research trials. Our long-term goal is then to test the intervention as delivered by non-psychologist specialist palliative care practitioners thus broadening the potential relevance of the approach.

          Trial registration

          Open Science Framework, 46033. Registered 19 April 2018.

          Related collections

          Most cited references37

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Qualitative and mixed methods provide unique contributions to outcomes research.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            A meta-analysis of the efficacy of acceptance and commitment therapy for clinically relevant mental and physical health problems.

            The current study presents the results of a meta-analysis of 39 randomized controlled trials on the efficacy of acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT), including 1,821 patients with mental disorders or somatic health problems. We searched PsycINFO, MEDLINE and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Information provided by the ACBS (Association of Contextual Behavioral Science) community was also included. Statistical calculations were conducted using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software. Study quality was rated using a methodology rating form. ACT outperformed control conditions (Hedges' g = 0.57) at posttreatment and follow-up assessments in completer and intent-to-treat analyses for primary outcomes. ACT was superior to waitlist (Hedges' g = 0.82), to psychological placebo (Hedges' g = 0.51) and to treatment as usual (TAU) (we defined TAU as the standard treatment as usual; Hedges' g = 0.64). ACT was also superior on secondary outcomes (Hedges' g = 0.30), life satisfaction/quality measures (Hedges' g = 0.37) and process measures (Hedges' g = 0. 56) compared to control conditions. The comparison between ACT and established treatments (cognitive behavioral therapy) did not reveal any significant differences between these treatments (p = 0.140). Our findings indicate that ACT is more effective than treatment as usual or placebo and that ACT may be as effective in treating anxiety disorders, depression, addiction, and somatic health problems as established psychological interventions. More research that focuses on quality of life and processes of change is needed to understand the added value of ACT and its transdiagnostic nature. © 2014 S. Karger AG, Basel.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Acceptance and Commitment Therapy as a Unified Model of Behavior Change

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                01244 511950 , n.hulbertwilliams@chester.ac.uk
                s.norwood@chester.ac.uk
                david.gillanders@ed.ac.uk
                anne.finucane@mariecurie.org.uk
                juliet.spiller@mariecurie.org.uk
                jenny.strachan@mariecurie.org.uk
                sue.millington@btopenworld.com
                b.swash@chester.ac.uk
                Journal
                Pilot Feasibility Stud
                Pilot Feasibility Stud
                Pilot and Feasibility Studies
                BioMed Central (London )
                2055-5784
                20 August 2019
                20 August 2019
                2019
                : 5
                : 104
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000 0001 0683 9016, GRID grid.43710.31, Centre for Contextual Behavioural Science, School of Psychology, , University of Chester, ; Parkgate Road, Chester, CH1 4BJ UK
                [2 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1936 7988, GRID grid.4305.2, School of Health in Social Science, , University of Edinburgh, ; Edinburgh, UK
                [3 ]Marie Curie Hospice Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9041-5485
                Article
                488
                10.1186/s40814-019-0488-4
                6702709
                31452926
                94a13c1f-263c-4e20-8ee7-f4d51802eace
                © The Author(s). 2019

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 23 November 2018
                : 12 August 2019
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100011715, Macmillan Cancer Support;
                Award ID: 400914
                Award Recipient :
                Categories
                Study Protocol
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2019

                palliative care,acceptance and commitment therapy,cancer,single-case design

                Comments

                Comment on this article