Interaction between primary and secondary sporocysts of Schistosoma mansoni and the internal defence system of Biomphalaria resistant and susceptible to the parasite

There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

Abstract

The outcome of the interaction between Biomphalaria and Schistosoma mansoni depends on the response of the host internal defence system (IDS) and the escape mechanisms of the parasite. The aim of this study was to evaluate the responsiveness of the IDS (haemocytes and soluble haemolymph factors) of resistant and susceptible Biomphalaria tenagophila lineages and Biomphalaria glabrata lineages in the presence of in vitro-transformed primary sporocysts and secondary sporocysts obtained from infected B. glabrata. To do this, we assayed the cellular adhesion index (CAI), analysed viability/mortality, used fluorescent markers to evaluate the tegumental damage and transplanted secondary sporocysts. B. tenagophila Taim was more effective against primary and secondary sporocystes than the susceptible lineage and B. glabrata. Compared with secondary sporocysts exposed to B. tenagophila, primary sporocysts showed a higher CAI, a greater percentage of dead sporocysts and were labelled by lectin from Glycine max and Alexa-Fluor 488 fluorescent probes at a higher rate than the secondary sporocysts. However, the two B. tenagophila lineages showed no cercarial shedding after inoculation with secondary sporocysts. Our hypothesis that secondary sporocysts can escape the B. tenagophila IDS cannot be confirmed by the transplantation experiments. These data suggest that there are additional mechanisms involved in the lower susceptibilty of B. tenagophila to S. mansoni infection.

Related collections

Most cited references 49

Record: found
Abstract: not found
Article: not found

Estado atual da sistemática dos planorbídeos Brasileiros

W Paraense, WL Paraense, W. L. PARAENSE … (1975)

0 comments Cited 76 times – based on 0 reviews      Review now

Bookmark

Record: found
Abstract: found
Article: not found

On being a parasite in an invertebrate host: a short survival course.

Eric Loker (1994)

Many parasites develop in invertebrate hosts that possess internal defense systems (IDS) that vigorously defined self-integrity. Invertebrates apparently do not produce a large diversity of finely tuned immunorecognition molecules but rather rely on recognition of patterns. As a consequence, requirements for immune evasion are likely to be fundamentally different in such hosts. Although parasites of invertebrates certainly employ diverse tactics to evade host IDS, this review focuses on parasite-mediated interference with the structural and functional integrity of host hemocytes and argues that this is a common strategy of immune evasion. Parasites mediating such effects on host hemocytes are termed suppressors. In some cases, interference is mediated by mutualistic symbionts carried by the suppressors. Hemocytes from infected hosts exhibit diminished adherence to substrates, impaired spreading ability, and reduced ability to participate in phagocytosis or encapsulation reactions. As a result of the action of suppressors, the host's vulnerability to opportunistic parasites is increased, a phenomenon termed acquired susceptibility. A strategy of interference is therefore risky, particularly for suppressors with relatively long development times. As a result, suppressors may provoke either a partial generalized interference or a selective interference with host IDS function, actively contribute to protection of the host to discourage growth of opportunists (termed parasite-mediated internal defense), or induce compensatory host responses that protect the host but that do not jeopardize their own development. Some parasites consistently colonize previously infected hosts and seem to be specialized opportunists.