7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Risk factors for delayed hemorrhage after colonoscopic postpolypectomy: Polyp size and operative modality

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background and Aim

          Delayed postpolypectomy hemorrhage is relatively common, with occasional extensive blood loss, endangering life. This study aimed to determine the factors associated with postoperative hemorrhage.

          Methods

          The study was a retrospective cohort study of patients hospitalized for colonoscopic polypectomy at the Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tenth People's Hospital of Tongji University, China, between January and December 2015. Data on gender, age, bowel preparation, location, size, number of polyps, operative modality, pathology, and operation practitioner were collected. Patients were divided into two groups based on the presence or absence of postoperative hemorrhage.

          Results

          A total of 1962 polyps were detected in patients and they underwent polypectomy; hemorrhage occurred in 41 cases. A correlation was demonstrated between postpolypectomy hemorrhage and each of the following factors: polyp size and operative modality. The odds ratio (OR) was 4.535 (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.331–8.823) for 1–2‐cm polyps, 4.008 (95% CI, 0.904–17.776) for 2–3‐cm polyps, and 22.407 (95% CI, 5.783–86.812) for ≥3‐cm polyps. Compared with argon plasma coagulation, OR was 9.128 (95% CI, 3.548–23.486) for endoscopic mucosal resection and 31.257 (95% CI, 7.009–139.395) for endoscopic submucosal dissection.

          Conclusions

          The independent risk factors for delayed postpolypectomy hemorrhage include polyp size and operative modality.

          Related collections

          Most cited references19

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Asia Pacific consensus recommendations for colorectal cancer screening.

          Colorectal cancer (CRC) is rapidly increasing in Asia, but screening guidelines are lacking. Through reviewing the literature and regional data, and using the modified Delphi process, the Asia Pacific Working Group on Colorectal Cancer and international experts launch consensus recommendations aiming to improve the awareness of healthcare providers of the changing epidemiology and screening tests available. The incidence, anatomical distribution and mortality of CRC among Asian populations are not different compared with Western countries. There is a trend of proximal migration of colonic polyps. Flat or depressed lesions are not uncommon. Screening for CRC should be started at the age of 50 years. Male gender, smoking, obesity and family history are risk factors for colorectal neoplasia. Faecal occult blood test (FOBT, guaiac-based and immunochemical tests), flexible sigmoidoscopy and colonoscopy are recommended for CRC screening. Double-contrast barium enema and CT colonography are not preferred. In resource-limited countries, FOBT is the first choice for CRC screening. Polyps 5-9 mm in diameter should be removed endoscopically and, following a negative colonoscopy, a repeat examination should be performed in 10 years. Screening for CRC should be a national health priority in most Asian countries. Studies on barriers to CRC screening, education for the public and engagement of primary care physicians should be undertaken. There is no consensus on whether nurses should be trained to perform endoscopic procedures for screening of colorectal neoplasia.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Risk assessment for delayed hemorrhagic complication of colonic polypectomy: polyp-related factors and patient-related factors.

            Hemorrhage is among the most serious complications of colorectal polypectomy and may occur after a longer postprocedure interval. We aimed to elucidate the risk factors for delayed postpolypectomy hemorrhage, including both polyp characteristics and the general condition of the patients. Retrospective cohort study. A total of 6617 cases of colorectal polypectomy was performed in 3138 consecutive patients in Japan. The risk factors for delayed postpolypectomy hemorrhage were assessed among polyp characteristics (form, size, histologic features) and the method of resection by unconditional logistic regression. Patient conditions (smoking, alcohol, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemia) were compared between case-control pairs matched on polyp-related characteristics by conditional logistic regression. Hemorrhage occurred in 38 lesions (0.57%) of 37 patients (1.2%): 22 required endoscopic hemostasis and 1 required blood transfusion. Although polyp size was associated with the occurrence of delayed hemorrhage (10.0 +/- 6.9 mm in hemorrhage cases vs 5.6 +/- 3.8 mm in others, P < .0001), other polyp-related factors were not significant. Hypertension was a complication in 25 of 37 (68%) cases and in 21 of 74 (28%) matched controls, showing an adjusted odds ratio of 5.6 (95% CI 1.8-17.2, P = .001). Other patient characteristics were not significant. The interval between polypectomy and hemorrhage was significantly longer in patients with hypertension (median 6 days, range 2-14 days) than in those without hypertension (2.5 days, 1-9 days; P = .019). This study does not provide information regarding prevention of hemorrhage. Hypertension is a significant risk factor for delayed colorectal postpolypectomy hemorrhage. The interval between polypectomy and hemorrhage can be as long as 14 days in the presence of hypertension.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Location in the right hemi-colon is an independent risk factor for delayed post-polypectomy hemorrhage: a multi-center case-control study.

              Delayed hemorrhage is an infrequent, but serious complication of colonoscopic polypectomy. Large size is the only polyp-related factor that has been unequivocally proven to increase the risk of delayed bleeding. It has been suggested that location in the right hemi-colon is also a risk factor. The objective of this study was to determine whether polyp location is an independent risk factor for delayed post-polypectomy hemorrhage. A retrospective case-control study was conducted in two university hospitals and two community hospitals. Thirty-nine cases and 117 controls were identified. In multivariate analysis, size and location were found to be independent polyp-related risk factors for delayed type hemorrhage. The risk increased by 13% for every 1 mm increase in polyp diameter (odds ratio (OR) 1.13, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.05-1.20, P<0.001). Polyps located in the right hemi-colon had an OR of 4.67 (1.88-11.61, P=0.001) for delayed hemorrhage. Polyps in the cecum seemed to be especially at high risk in univariate analysis (OR 13.82, 95% CI 2.66-71.73), but this could not be assessed in multivariate analysis as the number of cases was too small. Polyp type (sessile or pedunculated) was not a risk factor. Polyp location in the right hemi-colon seems to be an independent and substantial risk factor for delayed post-polypectomy hemorrhage. A low threshold for preventive hemostatic measures is advised when removing polyps from this region.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                zhanjuliu66@126.com
                Journal
                JGH Open
                JGH Open
                10.1002/(ISSN)2397-9070
                JGH3
                JGH Open: An Open Access Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology
                Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd (Melbourne )
                2397-9070
                09 November 2018
                February 2019
                : 3
                : 1 ( doiID: 10.1002/jgh3.2019.3.issue-1 )
                : 61-64
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital of TongJi University Shanghai China
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                Zhanju Liu, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital of TongJi University, Shanghai 200072, China. Email: zhanjuliu66@ 123456126.com

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6149-3628
                Article
                JGH312106
                10.1002/jgh3.12106
                6386734
                30834342
                953851fc-4a83-4015-a174-4c7e208d7f1e
                © 2018 The Authors. JGH Open: An open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology published by Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Foundation and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.

                History
                : 15 June 2018
                : 30 September 2018
                : 09 October 2018
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 3, Pages: 5, Words: 2805
                Funding
                Funded by: National Natural Science Foundation of China
                Award ID: 81300289
                Categories
                Original Article
                Original Articles
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                jgh312106
                February 2019
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_NLMPMC version:5.6.0 mode:remove_FC converted:22.02.2019

                delayed postoperative hemorrhage,operative modality,polyp size,polypectomy

                Comments

                Comment on this article