6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      The Besieged Mind: Demonically-Induced Obsession in Late Antique Monastic Psychology

      Journal of Cognitive Historiography
      Equinox Publishing

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Late antique monks were constantly besieged by demons. This article seeks to gain an insight into the reality behind monastic accounts of this demonically-induced psychological state, characterized by an uncontrollable preoccupation with demonically-inspired thoughts. This distressful experience is depicted in early monastic sources by using Greek verbs expressing “to besiege”, which have been rendered into Latin as obsidere (to besiege) – the etymological root of “obsession” in modern usage. A juxtaposition of modern accounts of obsession and monastic accounts of the besieged mind points to striking similarities in the symptoms – similarities which, I argue, are not accidental. Rather, the internalized interpretation of the siege enabled monastic writers to cope with questions regarding the aetiology of obsession-like symptoms. Cognitive research of obsession helps to account for the prevalence of this demonically-induced psychological state in monastic sources. Thereby it underscores the sophistication of monastic psychology cum demonology, which developed its own representation of the human mind and its operations.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Journal of Cognitive Historiography
          jch
          Equinox Publishing
          2051-9672
          2051-9680
          June 5 2017
          February 25 2016
          : 2
          : 2
          : 116-131
          Article
          10.1558/jch.26950
          95436c3d-6bf8-4fb7-a91a-8e5c138a8482
          © 2017
          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article