141
views
1
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      New Archaeological Evidence for an Early Human Presence at Monte Verde, Chile

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Questions surrounding the chronology, place, and character of the initial human colonization of the Americas are a long-standing focus of debate. Interdisciplinary debate continues over the timing of entry, the rapidity and direction of dispersion, the variety of human responses to diverse habitats, the criteria for evaluating the validity of early sites, and the differences and similarities between colonization in North and South America. Despite recent advances in our understanding of these issues, archaeology still faces challenges in defining interdisciplinary research problems, assessing the reliability of the data, and applying new interpretative models. As the debates and challenges continue, new studies take place and previous research reexamined. Here we discuss recent exploratory excavation at and interdisciplinary data from the Monte Verde area in Chile to further our understanding of the first peopling of the Americas. New evidence of stone artifacts, faunal remains, and burned areas suggests discrete horizons of ephemeral human activity in a sandur plain setting radiocarbon and luminescence dated between at least ~18,500 and 14,500 cal BP. Based on multiple lines of evidence, including sedimentary proxies and artifact analysis, we present the probable anthropogenic origins and wider implications of this evidence. In a non-glacial cold climate environment of the south-central Andes, which is challenging for human occupation and for the preservation of hunter-gatherer sites, these horizons provide insight into an earlier context of late Pleistocene human behavior in northern Patagonia.

          Related collections

          Most cited references5

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The late Pleistocene dispersal of modern humans in the Americas.

          When did humans colonize the Americas? From where did they come and what routes did they take? These questions have gripped scientists for decades, but until recently answers have proven difficult to find. Current genetic evidence implies dispersal from a single Siberian population toward the Bering Land Bridge no earlier than about 30,000 years ago (and possibly after 22,000 years ago), then migration from Beringia to the Americas sometime after 16,500 years ago. The archaeological records of Siberia and Beringia generally support these findings, as do archaeological sites in North and South America dating to as early as 15,000 years ago. If this is the time of colonization, geological data from western Canada suggest that humans dispersed along the recently deglaciated Pacific coastline.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The Buttermilk Creek complex and the origins of Clovis at the Debra L. Friedkin site, Texas.

            Compelling archaeological evidence of an occupation older than Clovis (~12.8 to 13.1 thousand years ago) in North America is present at only a few sites, and the stone tool assemblages from these sites are small and varied. The Debra L. Friedkin site, Texas, contains an assemblage of 15,528 artifacts that define the Buttermilk Creek Complex, which stratigraphically underlies a Clovis assemblage and dates between ~13.2 and 15.5 thousand years ago. The Buttermilk Creek Complex confirms the emerging view that people occupied the Americas before Clovis and provides a large artifact assemblage to explore Clovis origins.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Cranial morphology of early Americans from Lagoa Santa, Brazil: implications for the settlement of the New World.

              Comparative morphological studies of the earliest human skeletons of the New World have shown that, whereas late prehistoric, recent, and present Native Americans tend to exhibit a cranial morphology similar to late and modern Northern Asians (short and wide neurocrania; high, orthognatic and broad faces; and relatively high and narrow orbits and noses), the earliest South Americans tend to be more similar to present Australians, Melanesians, and Sub-Saharan Africans (narrow and long neurocrania; prognatic, low faces; and relatively low and broad orbits and noses). However, most of the previous studies of early American human remains were based on small cranial samples. Herein we compare the largest sample of early American skulls ever studied (81 skulls of the Lagoa Santa region) with worldwide data sets representing global morphological variation in humans, through three different multivariate analyses. The results obtained from all multivariate analyses confirm a close morphological affinity between South-American Paleoindians and extant Australo-Melanesians groups, supporting the hypothesis that two distinct biological populations could have colonized the New World in the Pleistocene/Holocene transition.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS ONE
                plos
                plosone
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
                1932-6203
                18 November 2015
                2015
                : 10
                : 11
                : e0141923
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Anthropology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, United States of America
                [2 ]Universidad Austral de Chile, Valdivia, Chile
                [3 ]Universidad Catolica de Temuco, Chile
                [4 ]Fundación Wulaia y Sociedad Chilena de Arqueología, Santiago, Chile
                [5 ]Departamento de Geologia Sedimentar e Ambiental, Instituto de Geociências, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brasil
                [6 ]Instituto de Ciencias de la Tierra, Universidad Austral de Chile, Valdivia, Chile
                [7 ]Texas State University, San Marcos, Texas, United States of America
                [8 ]PaleoResearch Institute, Inc., Golden, Colorado, United States of America
                [9 ]Museu de Arqueologia e Etnologia, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brasil
                [10 ]Observatório Nacional, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
                [11 ]Departamento de Geofísica, Instituto de Astronomia, Geofísica e Ciências Atmosféricas, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brasil
                [12 ]Oficina Técnica, Servicio Nacional de Geologia y Mineria, Puerto Montt, Chile
                [13 ]Facultad de Estudios del Patrimonio Cultural y Educación, Universidad SEKA, Santiago, Chile
                [14 ]Department of Earth Sciences, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
                New York State Museum, UNITED STATES
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: The commercial affiliation with the Paleo Research Institute does not alter the authors' adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.

                Conceived and designed the experiments: TD CO JS RV MP MC LSC AS MM XV GH GD. Performed the experiments: TD CO JS RV MP MC LSC AS MM XV GH GD IA AG. Analyzed the data: TD CO JS RV MP MC LSC AS MM XV GH GD. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: TD RV MP LSC MM XV GH GD. Wrote the paper: TD RV MP MC LSC MM XV GH GD.

                Article
                PONE-D-15-18271
                10.1371/journal.pone.0141923
                4651426
                26580202
                955242ad-078a-4dee-808d-e839e5baf727
                Copyright @ 2015

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited

                History
                : 28 April 2015
                : 14 October 2015
                Page count
                Figures: 9, Tables: 2, Pages: 27
                Funding
                This research was funded by the National Council of Monuments, Chile, the National Geographic Society, Vanderbilt University, SERNAGEOMIN, Chile, Instituto de Geociencias, Universidad Austral de Chile, Instituto de Astronomia, Geofísica e Ciências Atmosféricas, Instituto de Geociências, Universidade de São Paulo, Brasil. The funding organizations had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. The funders provided support in the form of only travel, salary, field and laboratory costs for some authors [MP, CO, JS, RV, LSC], but did not have any additional role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. The specific roles of these authors are articulated in the ‘author contributions’ section. The Paleo Research Institute provided analytical services for only the pollen and phytolith studies. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                All relevant data are presented within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article