4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Immunologic overlap in a case of linear IgG/IgA bullous dermatosis responsive to rituximab

      case-report

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction Autoimmune subepidermal blistering diseases are caused by immunological loss of tolerance to components of hemidesmosomes, triggering humoral and cellular responses. 1 C3 and IgG deposition along the basement membrane zone is characteristic of bullous pemphigoid (BP). 1 , 2 Alternately, IgA deposition at the basement membrane zone is consistent with linear IgA bullous dermatosis (LABD). 1 , 3 An immunological overlap spanning the clinical and immunologic spectrum between BP and LABD has been reported and referred to as linear IgA/IgG bullous dermatosis (LAGBD). 3 , 4 LAGBD has a unique clinical presentation, immunologic properties, and distinct therapeutic options 1 , 5, 6, 7 including rituximab. Case report A 43-year-old African American man presented with a 7-month history of a worsening erythematous and pruritic rash, which had progressed to blisters and ocular pain 4 weeks prior the presentation. Topical triamcinolone and 2 weeks of 60 mg prednisone had failed to improve the rash. The patient denied any medication changes, history of malignancy, autoimmune disease, or inflammatory bowel disease. Past medical history was significant for end-stage renal disease secondary to hypertension (on hemodialysis) and obstructive sleep apnea. Medications included clonazepam, promethazine, metoprolol, and gabapentin. Physical examination showed numerous erosions with collarettes of scale and tense bullae in “string of pearls” annular configurations on the bilateral arms, thighs, and trunk (Fig 1, A and B). Mucosal involvement included sloughing of the left eye conjunctiva and tongue. Fig 1 Erosions, collarettes of scale, and tense bullae with examples of annular “string of pearl” configurations. A, Left back and arm. B, Right thigh. C, Resolution of bullae 16 days after initiation of rituximab, mycophenolate mofetil, and prednisone; erosions and collarettes of scale persisted. Histopathology from skin biopsies with hematoxylin-eosin stain and direct immunofluorescence microscopy was consistent with BP, demonstrating a subepidermal split, an eosinophil-rich inflammatory infiltrate (Fig 2), strong linear C3 deposition, equivocal IgG, and absent IgA along the basement membrane zone. However, indirect immunofluorescence with salt split skin revealed both linear IgG and IgA at the roof of the induced blister (epidermal staining pattern). Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay was positive for circulating anti-BP180 antibodies in the patient's serum, with IgG and IgA titers of 1:160 and 1:20, respectively. Anti-BP230 antibodies were absent. Fig 2 Biopsy specimens obtained from the right posterior shoulder. A, subepidermal blister. No necrosis of keratinocytes noted. B, Mixed inflammatory infiltrate including lymphocytes, histiocytes, and abundant eosinophils extending down to the level of the superficial vascular plexus. (Hematoxylin-eosin stain.) After an additional 2 weeks of prednisone without improvement, the patient was started on rituximab 375 mg/m2 weekly for 4 weeks and mycophenolate mofetil 500 mg twice daily. Prednisone was increased to 80 mg (0.5 mg/kg body weight). Dapsone was avoided due to anemia; methotrexate was avoided due to end-stage renal disease and morbid obesity. Gabapentin was discontinued due to the possibility of drug-induced BP. 1 , 8 Ophthalmology recommended prednisolone acetate ophthalmic suspension, and tobramycin, and dexamethasone ointments. Age-appropriate cancer and autoimmune disease screenings were recommended. Bullae completely cleared after 4 rituximab infusions (Fig 1, C), and prednisone was tapered over a month. The disease relapsed 9 months after initial treatment, but cleared with 2 additional rituximab infusions. Discussion Autoimmune subepidermal blistering diseases are rare. The BP incidence is 6-13 per million people and typically affects adults over 60 years of age. The LABD incidence is 0.3-2.3 per million and may present both in children and adults. 1 A review of 45 LAGBD cases in Japan showed that 49% of the patients were younger than 60 years of age. 9 In BP, the most common antigens are BP230 (a 230-kDa intracellular protein) and BP180 (a 180-kDa transmembrane glycoprotein). 1 Antibodies against BP180 are believed to induce the initial blisters, while anti-BP230 antibodies enhance the inflammatory reaction. 1 , 2 In LABD, the target antigens are the 97-kDa or 120-kDa fractions of BP180 carboxy-terminus. In LAGBD, IgG and IgA antibodies target BP180 most commonly, 4 , 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and, less often, laminin-332 11 , 15 , 16 and BP230. 11 , 14 , 17 Drug-induced BP and LABD have been reported 1 ; there is, however, no specific association of LAGBD with drugs. 7 , 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 LAGBD has been reported in patients with ulcerative colitis, 13 B-cell lymphoma, 17 and colorectal carcinoma. 11 Clinical manifestations of BP and LABD are variable and can overlap. LAGBD presentations include erythema, 10 , 14 pustules, 14 tense bullous lesions 7 , 10, 11, 12 , 16 , 17 and small vesicles in annular patterns. 10 , 13 , 16 Ocular and oral mucosa 7 , 11 involvement, as well as a case of LAGBD-related interstitial pneumonia, 19 have been reported. The relationship between LAGBD clinical manifestations and the type of predominant antibody highlights that BP, LAGBD, and LABD are on a spectrum. 20 Histopathologic evaluation shows subepidermal bullae. 1 Eosinophilic spongiosis and/or dermal infiltrate of eosinophils are seen in BP. LABD shows predominantly neutrophilic infiltrates. 1 LAGBD has mixed eosinophilic and neutrophilic infiltrates. 10 , 11 , 13 , 15 Direct immunofluorescence typically reveals the presence of linear deposits of IgG, IgA, and C3. LAGBD has been reported to have IgA and IgG binding mostly to the epidermal surface (as seen in this case), 10 , 12, 13, 14 , 17 , 21 and rarely combined epidermal-dermal 11 , 15 or dermal 16 sides. Treatment starts with a review of medications to identify and discontinue drugs potentially inducing the disease. 1 , 8 Age-appropriate screening for malignancy may be appropriate. 11 Systemic and topical corticosteroids are first-line treatment 1 , 2 ; however, significant side effects are common. Dapsone treatment is an effective option in LAGBD, limiting systemic immunosuppression. 2 , 7 , 13 , 16 , 17 Dapsone inhibits neutrophil adhesion and release of tissue-damaging oxidants and proteases. 6 Side effects include hemolytic anemia, methemoglobinemia, neutropenia, neuropathy, and hepatitis. It is contraindicated for patients with anemia (as in our case), liver disease, or low glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase enzyme levels. 6 Steroid-sparing adjunctive therapies include azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil, intravenous immunoglobulin, 1 and targeted therapies such as rituximab, an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody. Rituximab is Food and Drug Administration-approved for the treatment of pemphigus vulgaris. Case reports describe rituximab use for both BP and LABD with higher efficacy observed in IgG-dominant disease. 19 In BP, rituximab has a reported complete response rate of 85%, a recurrence rate of 29%, and an adverse effects rate of 24%. 22 Side effects include infections, anemia, syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion, drug fever, acute pruritus, peripheral arterial occlusive disease, and tachycardia. 22 Rituximab is an important treatment option for patients with multiple medical co-morbidities and severe disease as presented in this case report. The case presented here highlights the importance of distinguishing between BP, LABD, and LAGBD (Table I). The young age of the patient, mucosal involvement, and bullae in an annular configuration were not typical for classic BP. Only by further evaluation with indirect immunofluorescence and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay were IgA antibodies identified. The LAGBD diagnosis allows treatment with dapsone (not readily used for BP) or rituximab in severe cases. Due to distinct clinical features, immunologic findings, and treatment modalities, it is important for LAGBD to be recognized as a subtype of subepidermal blistering disease. Table I Comparison of clinical, histological, and immunological findings in BP, LAGBD, and LABD Bullous pemphigoid (BP) Linear IgA/IgG bullous dermatosis (LAGBD) Linear IgA bullous dermatosis (LABD) Epidemiology • 6-13 cases per million • Onset over 60 years of age • Mean presentation age, 80 years • 6.7% of the patients 0-15 years of age • 42.3% 15-60 years of age • 51% >60 years 9 • 0.3-2.3 cases per million • Childhood disease with mean age of 4.5 years; adult disease onset >60 years Associated conditions/triggers • Medications • Autoimmune diseases • Neurological diseases • Trauma, burns, UV radiation • Gastrointestinal diseases 13 • Malignancy 11 , 17 • Medications • Autoimmune diseases • Gastrointestinal diseases • Malignancy • Infections Pathogenesis (autoantibodies) • BP180 • BP230 • BP180 4 , 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 • BP230 11 , 14 , 17 • Laminin-332 11 , 15 , 16 • 97-kDa and 120-kDa fraction of BP180 • BP180 • BP230 • Anti-Type VII collagen Clinical presentation • Pruritus • Tense blisters and vesicles • Erosions and crusting • Urticarial and infiltrated papules and plaques • Oral involvement in 10%-30% • Eye, nose, pharynx, esophagus, and anogenital involvement is rare • Pruritus • Tense blisters and vesicles • Annular vesicular pattern 10 , 13 , 16 • Erosions and crusting • Erythema • Ocular and oral mucosa involvement 7 , 11 • Pruritus • Tense blisters and vesicles • Annular or hepetiform vesicular pattern • Erosions and crusting • Oral, ocular, nasal, pharyngeal, and esophageal involvement in up to 80% of patients Subepidermal blisters Pathology findings Eosinophilic and mononuclear cell infiltrate Mixed eosinophilic and neutrophilic infiltrate 10 , 11 , 13 , 15 Neutrophilic infiltrate Direct immunofluorescence IgG and/or C3 IgG + IgA and/or C3 IgA and/or C3 Indirect immunofluorescence • IgG • Mainly epidermal pattern • Combined epidermal/dermal pattern • IgG and IgA • Mainly epidermal pattern 10 , 12, 13, 14 , 17 , 21 • Combined epidermal/dermal pattern 16 • Rarely dermal pattern 16 • IgA • Mainly epidermal pattern • Combined epidermal/dermal pattern • Rarely dermal pattern 9 BP, Bullous pemphigoid; LAGBD, linear IgA/IgG bullous dermatosis; LABD, linear IgA bullous dermatosis. Conflicts of interest Henry K. Wong discloses contracted research for Solegenix, Abbot Laboratories, and Galderma. Dmitry Nedosekin, Kelsey Derrick Wilson, Katelynn Campbell, and Sara Shalin have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

          Related collections

          Most cited references22

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Dapsone in dermatology and beyond

          Dapsone (4,4′-diaminodiphenylsulfone) is an aniline derivative belonging to the group of synthetic sulfones. In 1937 against the background of sulfonamide era the microbial activity of dapsone has been discovered. Shortly thereafter, the use of dapsone to treat non-pathogen-caused diseases revealed alternate antiinflammatory mechanisms that initially were elucidated by inflammatory animal models. Thus, dapsone clearly has dual functions of both: antimicrobial/antiprotozoal effects and anti-inflammatory features similarly to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. The latter capabilities primarily were used in treating chronic inflammatory disorders. Dapsone has been investigated predominantly by in vitro methods aiming to get more insights into the effect of dapsone to inflammatory effector cells, cytokines, and/or mediators, such as cellular toxic oxygen metabolism, myoloperoxidase-/halogenid system, adhesion molecules, chemotaxis, membrane-associated phospholipids, prostaglandins, leukotrienes, interleukin-8, tumor necrosis factor α, lymphocyte functions, and tumor growth. Moreover, attention has been paid to mechanisms by which dapsone mediates effects in more complex settings like impact of lifespan, stroke, glioblastoma, or as anticonvulsive agent. Additionally, there are some dermatological investigations in human being using dapsone and its metabolites (e.g., leukotriene B4-induced chemotaxis, ultraviolet-induced erythema). It could be established that dapsone metabolites by their own have anti-inflammatory properties. Pharmacology and mechanisms of action are determining factors for clinical use of dapsone chiefly in neutrophilic and/or eosinophilic dermatoses and in chronic disorders outside the field of dermatology. The steroid-sparing effect of dapsone is useful for numerous clinical entities. Future avenues of investigations will provide more information on this fascinating and essential agent.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Rituximab and Omalizumab for the Treatment of Bullous Pemphigoid: A Systematic Review of the Literature

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Effectiveness and Safety of Rituximab in Recalcitrant Pemphigoid Diseases

              Introduction Rituximab (RTX) is a monoclonal antibody targeting CD20, a transmembrane protein expressed on B cells, causing B cell depletion. RTX has shown great efficacy in studies of pemphigus vulgaris, but data of pemphigoid diseases are limited. Objective To assess the effectiveness and safety of RTX in pemphigoid diseases. Methods The medical records of 28 patients with pemphigoid diseases that were treated with RTX were reviewed retrospectively. Early and late endpoints, defined according to international consensus, were disease control (DC), partial remission (PR), complete remission (CR), and relapses. Safety was measured by reported adverse events. Results Patients with bullous pemphigoid (n = 8), mucous membrane pemphigoid (n = 14), epidermolysis bullosa acquisita (n = 5), and linear IgA disease (n = 1) were included. Treatment with 500 mg RTX (n = 6) or 1,000 mg RTX (n = 22) was administered on days 1 and 15. Eight patients received additional 500 mg RTX at months 6 and 12. Overall, DC was achieved in 67.9%, PR in 57.1%, and CR in 21.4% of the cases. During follow-up, 66.7% patients relapsed. Repeated treatment with RTX led to remission (PR or CR) in 85.7% of the retreated cases. No significant difference in response between pemphigoid subtypes was found. IgA-dominant cases (n = 5) achieved less DC (20 vs. 81.3%; p = 0.007), less PR (20 vs. 62.5%; p = 0.149), and less CR (0 vs. 18.8%; p = 0.549) compared to IgG-dominant cases (n = 16). Five severe adverse events and three deaths were reported. One death was possibly related to RTX and one death was disease related. Conclusion RTX can be effective in recalcitrant IgG-dominant pemphigoid diseases, however not in those where IgA is dominant.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                JAAD Case Rep
                JAAD Case Rep
                JAAD Case Reports
                Elsevier
                2352-5126
                11 January 2021
                March 2021
                11 January 2021
                : 9
                : 57-60
                Affiliations
                [a ]College of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas
                [b ]Department of Dermatology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas
                [c ]Department of Pathology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas
                Author notes
                []Correspondence to: Henry K. Wong, MD, PhD, Department of Dermatology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, 4301 W. Markham St., slot #576, Little Rock, AR 72205. HKWong@ 123456uams.edu
                Article
                S2352-5126(21)00010-2
                10.1016/j.jdcr.2020.12.029
                7898068
                33665277
                9558f043-e160-4ae1-bd8d-6c96a72113cb
                © 2021 by the American Academy of Dermatology, Inc. Published by Elsevier, Inc.

                This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

                History
                Categories
                Case Report

                blistering disorder,bullous pemphigoid,dapsone,immunobullous,immunologic overlap,linear iga,rituximab,bp, bullous pemphigoid,labd, linear iga bullous dermatosis,lagbd, linear iga/igg bullous dermatosis

                Comments

                Comment on this article