17
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Tolerability, Safety, and Effectiveness of Oxycodone DETERx in Elderly Patients ≥65 Years of Age with Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Trial Design

          This was a phase III, randomized withdrawal, double-blind, placebo-controlled, enriched enrollment, parallel-group, multicenter study intended to demonstrate the safety, tolerability, and analgesic efficacy of oxycodone DETERx ® (Xtampza™ ER) compared with matching placebo.

          Methods

          This post hoc analysis was performed using data from a subpopulation of enrolled patients who were ≥65 years of age. The study enrolled male and female patients with a clinical diagnosis of moderate-to-severe chronic low back pain for a minimum of 6 months prior to screening who required around-the-clock opioid therapy. To be eligible for enrollment, patients were required to have an average 24-h pain intensity score of ≥5 and ≤9 on an 11-point (0–10) Pain Intensity—Numerical Rating Scale at the screening visit. The study enrolled both opioid-experienced and opioid-naïve patients. The study consisted of an open-label titration phase followed by a 12-week double-blind maintenance phase. The dose range was 40–160 mg oxycodone hydrochloride equivalent per day. This post hoc analysis evaluated the safety, tolerability, and effectiveness of oxycodone DETERx among patients ≥65 years of age. The effectiveness of oxycodone DETERx was evaluated based on average pain intensity scores, Patient Global Impression of Change, responder analysis, and Kaplan–Meier survival analysis. The safety and tolerability of oxycodone DETERx were also evaluated. Patients were randomized to either oxycodone DETERx or placebo using a blocked randomization scheme in a 1:1 ratio. Randomization was stratified by previous opioid use (naïve or experienced). The study drug was coded in a manner that maintained the blinding. Study personnel and patients remained blinded to the assigned treatments throughout the study.

          Results

          For this post-hoc analysis, the intent-to-treat and randomized safety populations included 52 patients ≥65 years old, 26 each in the oxycodone DETERx and placebo groups, who participated in the study during the titration phase and were randomized to the double-blind maintenance phase. Clinically important pain reduction from screening was achieved with oxycodone DETERx, with the median pain intensity score decreasing from 7.50 at screening to 2.69 at Week 12. A clinically meaningful treatment difference of −0.9 in pain score between oxycodone DETERx and placebo was observed. All 18 elderly patients who completed the study reported improvement in pain, with 62% showing ≥30% improvement and 54% showing ≥50% improvement in pain intensity compared with patients on placebo ( p = 0.0128 and p = 0.0501, respectively). Patients on oxycodone DETERx remained in the study longer than those on placebo. Of the 26 patients ≥65 years old randomized to continue oxycodone DETERx during the double-blind maintenance phase, 18 (69%) completed the study; only two patients (8%) in the oxycodone DETERx group discontinued due to adverse events. The safety and tolerability profiles showed no new or unexpected safety concerns. The adverse event profiles were similar between the titration and double-blind maintenance phases.

          Conclusions

          Oxycodone DETERx was efficacious and generally well tolerated in patients ≥65 years old.

          Trial Registration

          The study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01685684).

          Related collections

          Most cited references30

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Medical illness and the risk of suicide in the elderly.

          Suicide is a leading cause of death, and rates are especially high among the elderly. Medical illnesses may predispose to suicide, but few controlled studies have examined the association between specific diseases and suicide. We explored the relationship between treatment for several illnesses and the risk of suicide in elderly patients using a population-based approach. All Ontario residents 66 years or older who committed suicide between January 1, 1992, and December 31, 2000, were identified from provincial coroners' records. Their prescription records during the preceding 6 months were compared with those of living matched controls (1:4) to determine the presence or absence of 17 illnesses potentially associated with suicide. During the 9-year study period, we identified 1354 elderly patients who died of suicide. The most common mechanisms involved firearms (28%), hanging (24%), and self-poisoning (21%). Specific illnesses associated with suicide included congestive heart failure (odds ratio [OR], 1.73; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.33-2.24), chronic obstructive lung disease (OR, 1.62; 95% CI, 1.37-1.92), seizure disorder (OR, 2.95; 95% CI, 1.89-4.61), urinary incontinence (OR, 2.02; 95% CI, 1.29-3.17), anxiety disorders (OR, 4.65; 95% CI, 4.07-5.32), depression (OR, 6.44; 95% CI, 5.45-7.61), psychotic disorders (OR, 5.09; 95% CI, 3.94-6.59), bipolar disorder (OR, 9.20, 95% CI, 4.38-19.33), moderate pain (OR, 1.91; 95% CI, 1.66-2.20), and severe pain (OR, 7.52; 95% CI, 4.93-11.46). Treatment for multiple illnesses was strongly related to a higher risk of suicide. Almost half the patients who committed suicide had visited a physician in the preceding week. Many common illnesses are independently associated with an increased risk of suicide in the elderly. The risk is greatly increased among patients with multiple illnesses. These data may help clinicians to identify elderly patients at risk of suicide and open avenues for prevention.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The prescription drug epidemic in the United States: a perfect storm.

            Abuse of prescription analgesics in the USA is increasing. The epidemic has been driven by many factors, including marketing strategies, incorrect prescribing practices, a variety of legal and illegal drug sources, belated governmental responses and increases in the number of prescriptions written. Data sources including surveys, emergency room visits, treatment admissions, overdose deaths, toxicology laboratory findings and journal articles were examined to identify trends. The surveys and emergency department visits show use lowest among young teenagers and highest among older teenagers and young adults, with significant increases among those aged 55 and older. The length of time between initial use of an opioid other than heroin and admission to treatment is shortening. Mortality data and toxicology exhibits confirm the increases and show the variation in the prevalence of various drugs across the USA. Abuse is increasing, with varying patterns of use by high-risk groups and different geographic preferences. Prescription drug monitoring programs are being developed in each of the US states to deter 'doctor shopping'; the Food and Drug Administration has increased authority over manufacturers; and options for proper disposal of leftover medications exist. There is increased emphasis on responsible prescribing including risk assessments, prescribing agreements, treatment plans, and training for clinicians, as well as monitoring the interactions with benzodiazepines. However, unless these efforts decrease diversion, abuse and addiction, clinicians may lose the ability to use some of these opioids for effective pain management or so many barriers will be raised that pain will go undertreated or untreated. © 2011 Australasian Professional Society on Alcohol and other Drugs.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Efficacy and safety of opioid agonists in the treatment of neuropathic pain of nonmalignant origin: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

              In the United States, an estimated 2 million persons have neuropathic pain that is often resistant to therapy. The use of opioids for neuropathic pain remains controversial, in part because studies have been small, have yielded equivocal results, and have not established the long-term risk-benefit ratio of this treatment. To assess the efficacy and safety of opioid agonists for the treatment of neuropathic pain based on published randomized controlled trials (RCTs). We searched MEDLINE (1966 to December 2004) and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (fourth quarter, 2004) for articles in any language, along with reference lists of reviews and retrieved articles, using a combination of 9 search terms for RCTs with 32 terms for opioids and 15 terms for neuropathic pain. Trials were included in which opioid agonists were given to treat central or peripheral neuropathic pain of any etiology, pain was assessed using validated instruments, and adverse events were reported. Studies in which drugs other than opioid agonists were combined with opioids or opioids were administered epidurally or intrathecally were excluded. Data were extracted by 2 independent investigators and included demographic variables, diagnoses, interventions, efficacy, and adverse effects. Twenty-two articles met inclusion criteria and were classified as short-term (less than 24 hours; n = 14) or intermediate-term (median = 28 days; range = 8-56 days; n = 8) trials. The short-term trials had contradictory results. In contrast, all 8 intermediate-term trials demonstrated opioid efficacy for spontaneous neuropathic pain. A fixed-effects model meta-analysis of 6 intermediate-term studies showed mean posttreatment visual analog scale scores of pain intensity after opioids to be 14 units lower on a scale from 0 to 100 than after placebo (95% confidence interval [CI], -18 to -10; P<.001). According to number needed to harm (NNH), the most common adverse event was nausea (NNH, 3.6; 95% CI, 2.9-4.8), followed by constipation (NNH, 4.6; 95% CI, 3.4-7.1), drowsiness (NNH, 5.3; 95% CI, 3.7-8.3), vomiting (NNH, 6.2; 95% CI, 4.6-11.1), and dizziness (NNH, 6.7; 95% CI, 4.8-10.0). Short-term studies provide only equivocal evidence regarding the efficacy of opioids in reducing the intensity of neuropathic pain. Intermediate-term studies demonstrate significant efficacy of opioids over placebo for neuropathic pain, which is likely to be clinically important. Reported adverse events of opioids are common but not life-threatening. Further RCTs are needed to establish their long-term efficacy, safety (including addiction potential), and effects on quality of life.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                781-713-3729 , moconnor@collegiumpharma.com
                Journal
                Drugs Aging
                Drugs Aging
                Drugs & Aging
                Springer International Publishing (Cham )
                1170-229X
                1179-1969
                10 June 2017
                10 June 2017
                2017
                : 34
                : 8
                : 603-613
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Clinical Development, Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc., 780 Dedham Street, Suite 800, Canton, MA 02021 USA
                [2 ]Medical Affairs, Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc., 780 Dedham Street, Suite 800, Canton, MA 02021 USA
                [3 ]Clinical Operations, Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc., 780 Dedham Street, Suite 800, Canton, MA 02021 USA
                [4 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0444 5808, GRID grid.281094.6, Biostatistics, , Rho, Inc., ; 6330 Quadrangle Drive, Chapel Hill, NC 27517 USA
                Article
                473
                10.1007/s40266-017-0473-7
                5541102
                28600725
                958e0901-0cab-4702-813f-ca784f03246e
                © The Author(s) 2017

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

                History
                Categories
                Original Research Article
                Custom metadata
                © Springer International Publishing AG 2017

                Comments

                Comment on this article