0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      The ethics of scholarly publishing: exploring differences in plagiarism and duplicate publication across nations.

      1
      Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          This study explored national differences in plagiarism and duplicate publication in retracted biomedical literature. The national affiliations of authors and reasons for retraction of papers accessible through PubMed that were published from 2008 to 2012 and subsequently retracted were determined in order to identify countries with the largest numbers and highest rates of retraction due to plagiarism and duplicate publication. Authors from more than fifty countries retracted papers. While the United States retracted the most papers, China retracted the most papers for plagiarism and duplicate publication. Rates of plagiarism and duplicate publication were highest in Italy and Finland, respectively. Unethical publishing practices cut across nations.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          J Med Libr Assoc
          Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA
          1558-9439
          1536-5050
          Apr 2014
          : 102
          : 2
          Affiliations
          [1 ] kamos@phf.org, Project Manager , Council on Linkages Between Academia and Public Health Practice, Public Health Foundation, 1300 L Street Northwest, Suite 800, Washington, DC 20005.
          Article
          JMLA-D-13-00062
          10.3163/1536-5050.102.2.005
          24860263
          95aacd71-60e0-4307-90cf-b05186ca3719
          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article