43
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The power of oral and nasal calls to discriminate individual mothers and offspring in red deer, Cervus elaphus

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          In most species, acoustical cues are crucial for mother-offspring recognition. Studies of a few species of ungulates showed that potential for individual recognition may differ between nasal and oral contact calls.

          Results

          Vocalizations of 28 hinds and 31 calves of farmed Iberian red deer ( Cervus elaphus hispanicus) were examined with discriminant function analyses (DFA) to determine whether acoustic structure of their oral and nasal contact calls encodes information about the caller’s identity. Contact calls were elicited by brief separation of individually identified animals by a distance over 10 m or by a bar fence. Both oral and nasal calls of both hinds and calves showed high potential to discriminate individuals. In hinds, individuality was significantly higher in the oral than in the nasal calls, whereas in calves, individuality was equally well expressed in both oral and nasal calls. For calves, the maximum fundamental frequency was higher and the duration was longer in oral calls than in nasal calls. For hinds, the maximum fundamental frequency and the duration were indistinguishable between oral and nasal calls. Compared to the pooled sample of oral and nasal calls, separate oral or nasal call samples provided better classifying accuracy to individual in either hinds or calves. Nevertheless, in both hinds and calves, even in the pooled sample of oral and nasal calls, the degree of individual identity was 2–3 times greater than expected by chance. For hinds that provided calls in both years, cross-validation of calls collected in 2012 with discriminant functions created with calls from 2011 showed a strong decrease of classifying accuracy to individual.

          Conclusions

          These results suggest different potentials of nasal and oral calls to allow the discrimination of individuals among hinds, but not among red deer calves. The high potential of individual recognition even with the pooled sample of oral and nasal calls allows mother and young to remember only one set of acoustic variables for mutual vocal recognition. Poor between-year stability of individual characteristics of hind oral and nasal calls would require updating keys to individual recognition each calving season.

          Electronic supplementary material

          The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12983-014-0094-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

          Related collections

          Most cited references66

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Vocal expression of emotions in mammals: mechanisms of production and evidence

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            The contribution of source-filter theory to mammal vocal communication research

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Finding a parent in a king penguin colony: the acoustic system of individual recognition.

              To be fed, a king penguin, Aptenodytes patagonicus, chick must identify the call of its parents, in the continuous background noise of the colony. To study this recognition process, we played back to the chicks parental calls with acoustic parameters modified in the temporal and frequency domains. The parental call is composed of syllables (complex sounds with harmonic series) separated by pronounced amplitude declines. Our experiments with modified signals indicate that the chick's frequency analysis of the call is not tuned towards precise peak energy values, the signal being recognized even when the carrier frequency was shifted 100 Hz down or 75 Hz up. To recognize the adult, chicks used frequency rather than amplitude modulation, in particular the frequency modulation shape of the syllable. This structure is repeated through the different syllables of the call giving a distinct vocal signature. Our experiments also show that the receiver needs to perceive only a small part of the signal: the first half of the syllable (0.23 s) and the first three harmonics were sufficient to elicit recognition. The small amount of information necessary to understand the message, the high redundancy in the time and frequency domains and the almost infinite possibilities of coding provided by the frequency modulation signature permit the chick to recognize the adult, without the help of a nest site. For these reasons, the code used in the call of the king penguin can be regarded as a functional code, increasing the possibility of individual recognition in an acoustically constraining environment. Copyright 1999 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                osibiryakova@bk.ru
                volodinsvoc@gmail.com
                v.matrosova@gmail.com
                volodinsvoc@mail.ru
                AndresJose.Garcia@uclm.es
                laureano.gallego@uclm.es
                Tomas.Landete@uclm.es
                Journal
                Front Zool
                Front. Zool
                Frontiers in Zoology
                BioMed Central (London )
                1742-9994
                13 January 2015
                13 January 2015
                2015
                : 12
                : 1
                : 2
                Affiliations
                [ ]Department of Vertebrate Zoology, Faculty of Biology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Vorobievy Gory, 12/1, Moscow, 119991 Russia
                [ ]Scientific Research Department, Moscow Zoo, B. Gruzinskaya, 1, Moscow, 123242 Russia
                [ ]Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology RAS, Vavilov str., 32, Moscow, 119991 Russia
                [ ]Animal Science Group. IREC (UCLM-CSIC-JCCM), IDR, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, 02071 Albacete, Spain
                Article
                94
                10.1186/s12983-014-0094-5
                4301055
                25610491
                95be8d0b-24bc-42a5-a62b-4baabdb0ed11
                © Sibiryakova et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 21 August 2014
                : 22 December 2014
                Categories
                Research
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2015

                Animal science & Zoology
                acoustic communication,individuality,mother-offspring recognition,ungulate,iberian red deer,cervus elaphus hispanicus,separation calls

                Comments

                Comment on this article