Blog
About

0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Treatment of Renal Stones by Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Based on an extensive review of the literature and our own clinical experience, this article attempts to present clear guidelines for the management of various kidney stones that will be acceptable to clinical urologists and their patients. Regarding our own patients, we compared different studies and discussed the results concerning the anatomical kidney situation, stone size, stone localization and observation time. Stone-free rates of patients with calyceal diverticula calculi range from 4 to 58%, with an increase after longer follow-up periods. According to the importance of residual fragments following extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL), we have to distinguish between clinical insignificant residual fragments and clinical significant residual fragments. 24 months following ESWL, stone passage occurs as a continuous process, and if there are no clinical symptoms, any endoscopic procedure should be considered as over-treatment. Newer ESWL technology has increased the percentage of clinically insignificant residual fragments. We consider percutaneous nephrolithotripsy in most of the patients with renal calculi smaller than 30 mm in diameter only as second-line therapy.

          Related collections

          Most cited references 5

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Laparoscopic omentectomy for salvage of peritoneal dialysis catheters.

          Maintaining long-term peritoneal catheter function for peritoneal dialysis is commonly threatened by problems with catheter obstruction. Multiple methods have been used to salvage nonfunctioning catheters, including omentopexy, catheter repositioning, and omentectomy. We report on our experience with a laparoscopic method of omentectomy and catheter fixation for salvage of nonfunctioning peritoneal dialysis catheters. Thirteen patients with nonfunctioning peritoneal dialysis catheters underwent 16 laparoscopic procedures with the intent to restore function. Clinically, all patients presented with outflow obstruction. At initial presentation, all patients underwent diagnostic laparoscopy and a definitive procedure. In 12 patients, catheters were enveloped by omentum, and we performed laparoscopic omentectomy and catheter fixation to the anterior pelvic wall. In one patient, we identified a broken catheter and performed a laparoscopic omentectomy at the time of catheter replacement. One 10-mm and two 5-mm trocars were utilized. Omentectomy was performed using either endo-GIA stapled resection (2 patients) or the Harmonic Scalpel (11 patients). All trocar incisions (including the 5-mm site) were closed with a suture-passing (Carter-Thomason) device to provide water-tight closure in anticipation of immediate return to peritoneal dialysis. Patients were followed postoperatively for an average of 17 months (range 4-35 months). All patients' catheter function was restored intraoperatively with laparoscopic omentectomy and catheter fixation. Eight catheters remained functioning following omentectomy without further intervention. Five patients (38%) experienced repeat catheter malfunction and underwent laparoscopic exploration. Of these, three catheters (60%) were restored to function with laparoscopic manipulation alone. Three catheters were found encased in extensive adhesions. Laparoscopic adhesiolysis was successful in one patient and unsuccessful in one patient, who converted to hemodialysis. One patient failed laparoscopic salvage and required open laparotomy and fibrin clot removal to restore catheter function. One catheter was found to be obstructed within a pericolic hematoma. One catheter was found within residual omentum at the hepatic flexure. Both of these catheters were freed laparoscopically and continued to function at 12 and 16 months' follow-up. Complications included one episode of peritonitis, one case of postoperative ileus, and one trocar site hernia necessitating repair. The nephrologists were instructed that they could begin peritoneal dialysis on postoperative day 1. Seven patients resumed peritoneal dialysis without leak from trocar sites. The remaining patients received temporary hemodialysis through a central venous catheter and returned to peritoneal dialysis at the discretion of their nephrologists. Laparoscopic omentectomy with catheter fixation is a minimally invasive means of salvaging peritoneal dialysis catheters with outflow obstruction. Complications are few, and closure of laparoscopic incisions in water-tight fashion allows rapid return to peritoneal dialysis.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            LOWER CALICEAL STONE CLEARANCE AFTER SHOCK WAVE LITHOTRIPSY OR URETEROSCOPY

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              A Prospective Trial Comparing the Efficacy and Complications of the Modified Dornier HM3 and MFL 5000 Lithotriptors for Solitary Renal Calculi

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                NEF
                Nephron
                10.1159/issn.1660-8151
                Nephron
                S. Karger AG
                978-3-8055-6818-0
                978-3-318-00390-1
                1660-8151
                2235-3186
                1999
                December 1998
                24 December 1998
                : 81
                : Suppl 1
                : 71-81
                Affiliations
                Department of Urology, Stadtkrankenhaus Heilbronn, University of Heidelberg, Germany
                Article
                46302 Nephron 1999;81(suppl 1):71–81
                10.1159/000046302
                9873218
                © 1998 S. Karger AG, Basel

                Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug. Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

                Page count
                Figures: 3, Tables: 12, References: 81, Pages: 11
                Product
                Self URI (application/pdf): https://www.karger.com/Article/Pdf/46302
                Categories
                Paper

                Comments

                Comment on this article