8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Evaluation of Five Formulae for Estimating Body Surface Area of Nigerian Children

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background:

          Physiological functions are often assessed by standardizing for body surface area (BSA) to avoid excessive variation in calculations in pediatric practice.

          Aim:

          To explore the suitability of existing formulae for estimating the BSA of Nigerian children.

          Subjects and Methods:

          This cross-sectional study involved healthy children in a Local Government Area, Oyo State, Nigeria. The BSAs of 2745 children were calculated using the formulae by Boyd, Mosteller, Gehan and George, Haycock, and Dubois-DuBois, and the sixth arithmetic mean of these five formulae (mean-BSA) was performed. The outcome of interest was agreement between estimated BSA and mean-BSA for each method. The performance of each BSA estimation method was compared using bias, root mean square error and Bland-Altman plots of agreement.

          Results:

          The study participants comprised of 1229 males and 1246 females with mean (standard deviation) ages of 6.3 (3.0) years and 6.6 (3.1) years respectively ( P = 0.01). Reference values for BSA estimates by gender were proposed each age group. Furthermore, BSA estimates from Boyd's and Mosteller's formulae were most similar to the mean-BSA with mathematically perfect correlations. The degree of deviation of BSA estimates from DuBois was largest with a remarkable increase at ages <6 years.

          Conclusion:

          Formulae by Boyd and Mosteller are the best BSA estimate for Nigerian children among the existing formulae.

          Related collections

          Most cited references24

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

          In clinical measurement comparison of a new measurement technique with an established one is often needed to see whether they agree sufficiently for the new to replace the old. Such investigations are often analysed inappropriately, notably by using correlation coefficients. The use of correlation is misleading. An alternative approach, based on graphical techniques and simple calculations, is described, together with the relation between this analysis and the assessment of repeatability.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Development of normalized curves for the international growth reference: historical and technical considerations.

            The World Health Organization recommended in 1978 that the National Center for Health Statistics/Centers for Disease Control growth reference curves be used as an international growth reference. To permit the expression of growth in terms of standard deviations, CDC developed growth curves from the observed data that approximate normal distributions. Because of significant skewness, standard deviations for weight-for-age and weight-for-height were calculated separately for distributions below and above the median. Standard deviations below the median were calculated from the 5th, 10th, 25th, and 50th observed percentiles while those above the median were based on the 50th, 75th, 90th, and 95th observed percentiles. Height-for-age distributions did not show significant skewness, thus, the standard deviations were calculated based on all six of the above observed percentiles. The normalized reference curves provide a highly useful data base that permits the standardized comparison of anthropometric data from different populations.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Body surface area as a determinant of pharmacokinetics and drug dosing.

              Body surface area (BSA) was introduced into medical oncology in order to derive a safe starting dose for phase I studies of anticancer drugs from preclinical animal toxicology data. It is not clear however, as to why dosing by BSA was extended to the routine dosing of antineoplastic agents. Several formulas exist to estimate BSA, but the formula derived by DuBois and DuBois is the one used in adult medical oncology. This formula was derived based on data from only nine patients; subsequent attempts to validate the formula have found the DuBois formula to either over or underestimate the actual determined BSA. While cardiac output does correlate with BSA, the relationship between BSA and other physiologic measures relevant for drug metabolism and disposition, such as, renal and hepatic function, is weak or nonexistent. Further only epirubicin, etoposide, and carboplatin have been studied to determine if dosing by BSA would reduce interpatient variability, and none of these drugs were found to have significant relationships between their pharmacokinetics and BSA. Future clinical trials of new agents should not presume that dosing based on BSA reduces interpatient variability. Studies should examine the role, if any, BSA has in dosing new chemotherapeutic agents in initial phase I studies.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Ann Med Health Sci Res
                Ann Med Health Sci Res
                AMHSR
                Annals of Medical and Health Sciences Research
                Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd (India )
                2141-9248
                2277-9205
                Nov-Dec 2014
                : 4
                : 6
                : 889-898
                Affiliations
                [1] Institute of Child Health, College of Medicine, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria
                [1 ] Department of Paediatrics, University College Hospital, Ibadan, Nigeria
                Author notes
                Address for correspondence: Dr. Adebola E. Orimadegun, Institute of Child Health, College of Medicine, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria. E-mail: beorimadegun@ 123456yahoo.com
                Article
                AMHSR-4-889
                10.4103/2141-9248.144907
                4250987
                25506482
                95ea177a-8e40-486e-aa3a-4bf2d72ed918
                Copyright: © Annals of Medical and Health Sciences Research

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                Categories
                Original Article

                Medicine
                anthropometry,formulae,physiological functions,plots of agreement
                Medicine
                anthropometry, formulae, physiological functions, plots of agreement

                Comments

                Comment on this article