4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Effect of feeding barley or corn silage with dry-rolled barley, corn, or a blend of barley and corn grain on rumen fermentation, total tract digestibility, and nitrogen balance for finishing beef heifers

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Five ruminally cannulated heifers were used in an incomplete 6 × 6 Latin square design to determine the effects of cereal silage (barley vs. corn), cereal grain (barley vs. corn vs. a 50:50 blend of barley and corn), and their interaction ( S × G) on dry matter intake, ruminal fermentation, total tract digestibility, nitrogen balance, and in situ degradation. Corn silage ( CS) or barley silage ( BS) was included at 8% of dietary dry matter ( DM). Within each silage source, diets contained (DM basis) either dry-rolled barley ( BG; 86%), dry-rolled corn ( CG; 85%), or an equal blend of barley and corn ( BLEND; 85%). Periods were 25 d, with 5 d of dietary transition, 13 d of dietary adaptation, and 7 d of data and sample collection. Samples collected included feed and refusals, total urine and feces, and ruminal fluid. All data were analyzed using the Mixed model of SAS with the fixed effects of silage, grain, and the S × G. Dry matter intake ( P ≥ 0.19) and mean ruminal pH ( P ≥ 0.096) were not affected by the silage, grain, or S × G. Total short-chain fatty acid concentrations were greater for BLEND than BG or CG (grain, P = 0.003) and for CS (silage, P = 0.009) relative to BS. The molar proportion of acetate was greater for BS-BG and BS-CG (S × G, P < 0.001), while molar proportion of propionate was greater for CS-BG (S × G, P < 0.001) relative to other silage and grain source combinations. Rumen ammonia-N concentration was greater for CG than BG, or BLEND (grain, P < 0.001), and greater for CS compared to BS (silage, P = 0.023). Apparent total tract digestibility of DM, organic matter, neutral detergent fiber, starch, and gross energy were greatest for BG (grain, P ≤ 0.035). Digestible energy content (Mcal/kg) was greater for BG (grain, P = 0.029) than CG and BLEND. Total nitrogen retention (g/d and % of intake) was greatest for CS-BG (S × G, P ≤ 0.033) relative to all other treatments. In situ degradation rates of DM, crude protein, and starch were greater for BG than CG ( P ≤ 0.004). The potentially degradable fraction of DM, crude protein, and starch was greater for CG ( P ≤ 0.031), while the undegradable fraction was greater for BG ( P ≤ 0.046). For silage sources, CS had greater 24 h in situ DM digestibility ( P = 0.009) and starch digestibility (24, 48, and 72 h incubations, P ≤ 0.034) relative to BS. Results suggest that while feeding a combination of CS and BG promotes propionate production and greater N retention; few other additive effects were observed.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          J Anim Sci
          J. Anim. Sci
          jansci
          Journal of Animal Science
          Oxford University Press (US )
          0021-8812
          1525-3163
          January 2020
          09 January 2020
          09 January 2021
          : 98
          : 1
          : skaa002
          Affiliations
          [1 ] Department of Animal and Poultry Science, University of Saskatchewan , Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
          [2 ] Lethbridge Research Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada , Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada
          Author notes
          Corresponding author: greg.penner@ 123456usask.ca
          Author information
          http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6396-2130
          Article
          PMC6984997 PMC6984997 6984997 skaa002
          10.1093/jas/skaa002
          6984997
          31917428
          95ea7958-5acf-4fce-97f8-5afb25efaaec
          © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

          This article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model ( https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model)

          History
          : 14 October 2019
          : 08 January 2020
          : 27 January 2020
          Page count
          Pages: 11
          Funding
          Funded by: Saskatchewan Barley Development Commission
          Funded by: Dupont Pioneer
          Funded by: Saskatchewan Cattleman’s Association
          Funded by: Saskatchewan Ministry of Agriculture
          Categories
          Ruminant Nutrition

          additive effects,cereal grain,short-season corn
          additive effects, cereal grain, short-season corn

          Comments

          Comment on this article