5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Toxicological Aspects of Increased Use of Surface and Hand Disinfectants in Croatia During the COVID-19 Pandemic: a Preliminary Report Translated title: Toksikološki aspekti povećane uporabe dezinficijensa u Hrvatskoj za vrijeme COVID-19 pandemije: preliminarno istraživanje

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          All COVID-19 prevention strategies include regular use of surface disinfectants and hand sanitisers. As these measures took hold in Croatia, the Croatian Poison Control Centre started receiving phone calls from the general public and healthcare workers, which prompted us to investigate whether the risk of suspected/symptomatic poisonings with disinfectants and sanitisers really increased. To that end we compared their frequency and characteristics in the first half of 2019 and 2020. Cases of exposures to disinfectants doubled in the first half of 2020 (41 vs 21 cases in 2019), and exposure to sanitisers increased about nine times (46 vs 5 cases in 2019). In 2020, the most common ingredients of disinfectants and sanitisers involved in poisoning incidents were hypochlorite/glutaraldehyde, and ethanol/isopropyl alcohol, respectively. Exposures to disinfectants were recorded mostly in adults (56 %) as accidental (78 %) through ingestion or inhalation (86 %). Fortunately, most callers were asymptomatic (people called for advice because they were concerned), but nearly half reported mild gastrointestinal or respiratory irritation, and in one case severe symptoms were reported (gastrointestinal corrosive injury). Reports of exposure to hand sanitisers highlighted preschool children as the most vulnerable group. Accidental exposure through ingestion dominated, but, again, only mild symptoms (gastrointestinal or eye irritation) developed in one third of the cases. These preliminary findings, however limited, confirm that increased availability and use of disinfectants and sanitisers significantly increased the risk of poisoning, particularly in preschool children through accidental ingestion of hand sanitisers. We therefore believe that epidemiological recommendations for COVID-19 prevention should include warnings informing the general public of the risks of poisoning with surface and hand disinfectants in particular.

          Abstract

          Preventivne strategije za COVID-19 infekciju u kućanstvima, javnim i radnim prostorima uključuju redovitu uporabu biocidnih proizvoda – dezinficijensa za površine i za kožu šaka. Analizirali smo pozive zaprimljene u hrvatskom Centru za kontrolu otrovanja vezane uz sumnju na otrovanja, odnosno simptomatska otrovanja dezinficijensima. Cilj studije bio je usporediti broj i karakteristike tih poziva, zaprimljenih u prvih šest mjeseci u 2019. i u 2020. godini, kako bi se procijenio utjecaj COVID-19 pandemije. Broj slučajeva izloženosti dezinficijensima za površine udvostručio se u prvih šest mjeseci u 2020. u odnosu na 2019. godinu (41 vs 21 slučaj), a izloženost dezinficijensima za šake povećala se oko devet puta (46 vs 5 slučajeva). U 2020. godini najčešći sastojci dezinficijensa za površine i šake uključeni u slučajeve otrovanja bili su hipoklorit/glutaraldehid, odnosno etanol/izopropilni alkohol. Izloženost dezinficijensima za površine zabilježena je najčešće u odraslih osoba (56 %), kao slučajna izloženost (78 %) ingestijom ili inhalacijom (86 %), s blagim simptomima (iritacija gastrointestinalnoga ili respiratornoga sustava) u 46 % i teškim otrovanjem (korozivna ozljeda gastrointestinalnoga sustava) u samo jednom slučaju. Izloženost dezinficijensima za šake zabilježena je najčešće u predškolske djece (70 %), kao slučajna izloženost (98 %) ingestijom (93 %), s razvojem blagih simptoma (iritacija gastrointestinalnoga sustava ili oka) u samo 30 % slučajeva. Zaključno, povećana dostupnost i uporaba dezinficijensa za površine i šake u Hrvatskoj tijekom COVID-19 pandemije dovela je do značajnog povećanja broja potencijalno toksičnih izloženosti, naročito slučajnih ingestija dezinficijensa za šake u predškolske djece. Osnovne mjere prevencije toksičnih učinaka biocida trebaju biti uključene u epidemiološke preporuke za prevenciju COVID-19 infekcije.

          Related collections

          Most cited references8

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Cleaning and Disinfectant Chemical Exposures and Temporal Associations with COVID-19 — National Poison Data System, United States, January 1, 2020–March 31, 2020

          On January 19, 2020, the state of Washington reported the first U.S. laboratory-confirmed case of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by infection with SARS-CoV-2 ( 1 ). As of April 19, a total of 720,630 COVID-19 cases and 37,202 associated deaths* had been reported to CDC from all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and four U.S. territories ( 2 ). CDC recommends, with precautions, the proper cleaning and disinfection of high-touch surfaces to help mitigate the transmission of SARS-CoV-2 ( 3 ). To assess whether there might be a possible association between COVID-19 cleaning recommendations from public health agencies and the media and the number of chemical exposures reported to the National Poison Data System (NPDS), CDC and the American Association of Poison Control Centers surveillance team compared the number of exposures reported for the period January–March 2020 with the number of reports during the same 3-month period in 2018 and 2019. Fifty-five poison centers in the United States provide free, 24-hour professional advice and medical management information regarding exposures to poisons, chemicals, drugs, and medications. Call data from poison centers are uploaded in near real-time to NPDS. During January–March 2020, poison centers received 45,550 exposure calls related to cleaners (28,158) and disinfectants (17,392), representing overall increases of 20.4% and 16.4% from January–March 2019 (37,822) and January–March 2018 (39,122), respectively. Although NPDS data do not provide information showing a definite link between exposures and COVID-19 cleaning efforts, there appears to be a clear temporal association with increased use of these products. The daily number of calls to poison centers increased sharply at the beginning of March 2020 for exposures to both cleaners and disinfectants (Figure). The increase in total calls was seen across all age groups; however, exposures among children aged ≤5 years consistently represented a large percentage of total calls in the 3-month study period for each year (range = 39.9%–47.3%) (Table). Further analysis of the increase in calls from 2019 to 2020 (3,137 for cleaners, 4,591 for disinfectants), showed that among all cleaner categories, bleaches accounted for the largest percentage of the increase (1,949; 62.1%), whereas nonalcohol disinfectants (1,684; 36.7%) and hand sanitizers (1,684; 36.7%) accounted for the largest percentages of the increase among disinfectant categories. Inhalation represented the largest percentage increase from 2019 to 2020 among all exposure routes, with an increase of 35.3% (from 4,713 to 6,379) for all cleaners and an increase of 108.8% (from 569 to 1,188) for all disinfectants. Two illustrative case vignettes are presented to highlight the types of chemical exposure calls managed by poison centers. FIGURE Number of daily exposures to cleaners and disinfectants reported to U.S. poison centers — United States, January–March 2018, 2019, and 2020* ,† * Excluding February 29, 2020. † Increase in exposures to cleaners on January 29, 2020, came from an unintentional exposure to a cleaning agent within a school. The figure consists of two side-by-side line graphs, comparing the number of daily exposures to cleaners and disinfectants reported to U.S. poison centers during January–March of 2018, 2019, and 2020. TABLE Number and percentage of exposures to cleaners and disinfectants reported to U.S. poison centers, by selected characteristics — United States, January–March 2018, 2019, and 2020 Characteristic No. (%) Cleaners Disinfectants 2018 2019 2020 2018 2019 2020 Total 25,583 (100.0) 25,021 (100.0) 28,158 (100.0) 13,539 (100.0) 12,801 (100.0) 17,392 (100.0) Age group (yrs) 0–5 10,926 (42.7) 10,207 (40.8) 10,039 (35.7) 7,588 (56.0) 6,802 (53.1) 8,158 (46.9) 6–19 2,655 (10.4) 2,464 (9.8) 2,516 (8.9) 1,803 (13.3) 1,694 (13.2) 2,358 (13.6) 20–59 8,072 (31.6) 8,203 (32.8) 9,970 (35.4) 2,659 (19.6) 2,791 (21.8) 4,056 (23.3) ≥60 1,848 (7.2) 1,936 (7.7) 2,356 (8.4) 929 (6.9) 848 (6.6) 1,455 (8.4) Unknown 2,082 (8.1) 2,211 (8.8) 3,277 (11.6) 560 (4.1) 666 (5.2) 1,365 (7.8) Exposure route* Ingestion 16,384 (64.0) 15,710 (62.8) 16,535 (58.7) 11,714 (86.5) 10,797 (84.3) 13,993 (80.5) Inhalation 4,747 (18.6) 4,713 (18.8) 6,379 (22.7) 540 (4.0) 569 (4.4) 1,188 (6.8) Dermal 4,349 (17.0) 4,271 (17.1) 4,785 (17.0) 1,085 (8.0) 1,078 (8.4) 1,695 (9.7) Ocular 3,355 (13.1) 3,407 (13.6) 3,802 (13.5) 984 (7.3) 1,067 (8.3) 1,533 (8.8) Other/Unknown 182 (0.7) 169 (0.7) 166 (0.6) 89 (0.7) 95 (0.7) 147 (0.8) *Exposure might have more than one route. Case 1 An adult woman heard on the news to clean all recently purchased groceries before consuming them. She filled a sink with a mixture of 10% bleach solution, vinegar, and hot water, and soaked her produce. While cleaning her other groceries, she noted a noxious smell described as “chlorine” in her kitchen. She developed difficulty breathing, coughing, and wheezing, and called 911. She was transported to the emergency department (ED) via ambulance and was noted to have mild hypoxemia and end-expiratory wheezing. She improved with oxygen and bronchodilators. Her chest radiograph was unremarkable, and she was discharged after a few hours of observation. Case 2 A preschool-aged child was found unresponsive at home and transported to the ED via ambulance. A 64-ounce bottle of ethanol-based hand sanitizer was found open on the kitchen table. According to her family, she became dizzy after ingesting an unknown amount, fell and hit her head. She vomited while being transported to the ED, where she was poorly responsive. Her blood alcohol level was elevated at 273 mg/dL (most state laws define a limit of 80 mg/dL for driving under the influence); neuroimaging did not indicate traumatic injuries. She was admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit overnight, had improved mental status, and was discharged home after 48 hours. The findings in this report are subject to at least two limitations. First, NPDS data likely underestimate the total incidence and severity of poisonings, because they are limited to persons calling poison centers for assistance. Second, data on the direct attribution of these exposures to efforts to prevent or treat COVID-19 are not available in NPDS. Although a causal association cannot be demonstrated, the timing of these reported exposures corresponded to increased media coverage of the COVID-19 pandemic, reports of consumer shortages of cleaning and disinfection products ( 4 ), and the beginning of some local and state stay-at-home orders. Exposures to cleaners and disinfectants reported to NPDS increased substantially in early March 2020. Associated with increased use of cleaners and disinfectants is the possibility of improper use, such as using more than directed on the label, mixing multiple chemical products together, not wearing protective gear, and applying in poorly ventilated areas. To reduce improper use and prevent unnecessary chemical exposures, users should always read and follow directions on the label, only use water at room temperature for dilution (unless stated otherwise on the label), avoid mixing chemical products, wear eye and skin protection, ensure adequate ventilation, and store chemicals out of the reach of children.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Methanol as an Unlisted Ingredient in Supposedly Alcohol-Based Hand Rub Can Pose Serious Health Risk

            Alcohol-based hand rub (hand sanitizer) is heavily used in the community and the healthcare setting to maintain hand hygiene. Methanol must never be used in such a product because oral, pulmonary and/or skin exposures can result in severe systemic toxicity and even deaths. However, sporadic cases of acute poisoning indicate that alcohol-based hand rub with undeclared methanol may be found in the market from time to time. The unexpected presence of methanol poses a serious threat to public health. Unintentional ingestion by young children and inadvertent consumption by older subjects as alcohol (ethanol) substitute can occur. Methanol is more lethal and poisoning often requires antidotal therapy, in addition to supporting therapy and critical care. However, specific therapy may be delayed because the exposure to methanol is initially not suspected. When repeatedly used as a hand rub, skin absorption resulting in chronic toxicity (e.g., visual disturbances) occurs, particularly if methanol induced desquamation and dermatitis are present. Nationwide surveillance systems, regional/international toxicovigilance networks and situational awareness among the healthcare professionals should facilitate the early detection, management and prevention of such poisoning incidents of public health significance.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Reported Adverse Health Effects in Children from Ingestion of Alcohol-Based Hand Sanitizers — United States, 2011–2014

              Hand sanitizers are effective and inexpensive products that can reduce microorganisms on the skin, but ingestion or improper use can be associated with health risks. Many hand sanitizers contain up to 60%–95% ethanol or isopropyl alcohol by volume, and are often combined with scents that might be appealing to young children. Recent reports have identified serious consequences, including apnea, acidosis, and coma in young children who swallowed alcohol-based (alcohol) hand sanitizer ( 1 – 3 ). Poison control centers collect data on intentional and unintentional exposures to hand sanitizer solutions resulting from various routes of exposure, including ingestion, inhalation, and dermal and ocular exposures. To characterize exposures of children aged ≤12 years to alcohol hand sanitizers, CDC analyzed data reported to the National Poison Data System (NPDS).* The major route of exposure to both alcohol and nonalcohol-based (nonalcohol) hand sanitizers was ingestion. The majority of intentional exposures to alcohol hand sanitizers occurred in children aged 6–12 years. Alcohol hand sanitizer exposures were associated with worse outcomes than were nonalcohol hand sanitizer exposures. Caregivers and health care providers should be aware of the potential dangers associated with hand sanitizer ingestion. Children using alcohol hand sanitizers should be supervised and these products should be kept out of reach from children when not in use. In 2005, the annual rate of intentional alcohol hand sanitizer exposure was 0.68 per 1 million U.S. residents (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.17–1.20) ( 4 ). During 2005–2009, this rate increased, on average, by 0.32 per 1 million per year (95% CI = 0.11–0.53; p = 0.02) ( 4 ). Young children, including infants, are more likely to develop complications from alcohol intoxication than are older children and teens. Younger children have decreased liver glycogen stores, which increase their risk of developing hypoglycemia, and have various pharmokinetic factors, which make them more susceptible to developing toxicity from alcohol ( 5 – 9 ). To characterize pediatric alcohol hand sanitizer exposures in the United States, data reported by poison centers in all states to NPDS among children aged ≤12 years during January 1, 2011–December 31, 2014 were analyzed. Analyses were stratified by age group (0–5 years and 6–12 years). Hand sanitizer exposures were defined as a poison center call reporting an exposure to either ethanol-based or isopropanol-based sanitizer solutions (alcohol hand sanitizer exposure) or a nonalcohol sanitizer product (nonalcohol hand sanitizer exposure). Calls reporting co-exposures to other agents were excluded to minimize confounding effects. Descriptive statistics were compiled for exposed children’s age, year and season of exposure, intentionality of exposure, route of exposure (ingestion, inhalation, dermal, or ocular), reported health effects (e.g., drowsiness, eye irritation, nausea, vomiting, etc.), and outcome, † and were compared for alcohol and nonalcohol hand sanitizers and age group. An exposure was coded by poison centers as unintentional if it was considered to be accidental or inadvertent. Deliberate exposures, because of deliberate misuse or abuse for example, were considered intentional. An exposure was considered to have resulted in an adverse health effect if at least one symptom (e.g., abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, etc.) was reported. Categorical data comparisons were performed using the chi-square test or, when cell sizes were <5, Fisher’s exact test. Significance was defined as p<0.05. Statistical software was used for the analysis. During 2011–2014, a total of 70,669 hand sanitizer exposures in children aged ≤12 years were reported to NPDS, including 65,293 (92%) alcohol exposures, and 5,376 (8%) nonalcohol exposures (Table 1). The number and percentage of each type of reported exposure was similar during each of the 4 years. Overall, 64,488 (91%) exposures occurred in children aged ≤5 years, and 6,181 (9%) occurred in children aged 6–12 years. There was no association between sanitizer type and year. Among all children, ingestion accounted for approximately 95% of reported exposures, including 97% of exposures among children aged ≤5 years (97.0% alcohol and 96.3% nonalcohol exposures) and 74% among children aged 6–12 years (74.0% alcohol and 72.0% nonalcohol exposures). A higher percentage of older children (aged 6–12 years) had intentional exposures to alcohol hand sanitizers (866; 15.0%) than to nonalcohol hand sanitizers (40; 8.0%) (p<0.001). This association was not found in younger children (aged ≤5 years). Ocular exposures to hand sanitizers were more common in older children (24.8% overall, 24.4% alcohol, and 29.0% nonalcohol) than among younger children (3.0% overall, 3.0% alcohol, and 3.2% nonalcohol). Although there was no seasonal variation in reported exposure to either hand sanitizer type among younger children, exposure frequency among older children was lower for both hand sanitizer types during the summer months (Figure). TABLE 1 Exposures to alcohol and nonalcohol hand sanitizer products among children aged ≤12 years reported to poison centers, by sanitizer type, year, age group, exposure route, and intentionality — United States, National Poison Data System, 2011–2014 Year No. (%) of exposures Alcohol Nonalcohol Total Total 65,293 (92.4) 5,376 (7.6) 70,669 2011 15,971 (92.5) 1,286 (7.5) 17,257 2012 16,571 (92.4) 1,355 (7.6) 17,926 2013 16,423 (92.5) 1,338 (7.5) 17,761 2014 16,328 (92.1) 1,397 (7.9) 17,725 Age group 0–5 yrs Total 59,612 (92.4) 4,876 (7.6) 64,488 (91.2)* Exposure route Ingestion 57,825 (97.0) 4,698 (96.3) 62,523 (97.0) Inhalation 74 (0.1) 10 (0.2) 84 (0.1) Dermal 2,385 (4.0) 135 (2.8) 2,520 (3.9) Ocular 1,782 (3.0) 157 (3.2) 1,939 (3.0) Intentionality Intentional 37 (0.1) 1 (0.0) 38 (0.1) Unintentional 59,575 (99.9) 4,875 (100.0) 64,450 (99.9) Age group 6–12 yrs Total 5,681 (91.9) 500 (8.1) 6,181 (8.7)* Exposure route Ingestion 4,204 (74.0) 351 (70.2) 4,555 (74.0) Inhalation 81 (1.4) 6 (1.2) 87 (1.4) Dermal 180 (3.2) 9 (1.8) 189 (3.1) Ocular 1,387 (24.4) 145 (29.0) 1,532 (24.8) Intentionality Intentional 866 (15.2) 40 (8.0) 906 (14.7) Unintentional 4,815 (84.8) 460 (92.0) 5,275 (85.3) *Percentage of total exposures. FIGURE Percentage of exposures from alcohol-based and nonalcohol-based hand sanitizer products in children aged ≤5 years and aged 6–12 years reported to poison centers, by month — United States, National Poison Data System, January 1, 2011–December 31, 2014 The figure above is a line chart showing the percentage of exposures from alcohol-based and nonalcohol-based hand sanitizer products in children aged ≤5 years and 6–12 years reported to poison centers, by month, in the United States during January 1, 2011–December 31, 2014. Overall, 8,219 (12%) patients had at least one reported symptom, including 7,703 (12%) children who ingested alcohol products, and 516 (10%) who ingested nonalcohol products. Adverse health effects were more likely to be reported for alcohol hand sanitizer exposures (p<0.001). The most common adverse health effects for both hand sanitizer types were ocular irritation (2,577; 31.4%) and vomiting (1,872; 22.8%). Conjunctivitis (862; 10.5%), oral irritation (782; 9.5%), cough (705; 8.6%), and abdominal pain (323; 3.9%) were also reported (Table 2). Rare health effects included coma (five), seizures (three), hypoglycemia (two), metabolic acidosis (two), and respiratory depression (two). Those rare effects occurred more frequently among children with alcohol hand sanitizer exposures, but the differences were not statistically significant when the rare health effects were analyzed individually. Alcohol hand sanitizers were significantly associated with worse outcomes (compared with no effect outcomes) when both age groups were analyzed (p = 0.02). Approximately two thirds (66%) of children with exposures were not followed to determine outcome (Table 2). Among patients who were followed (23,828), exposure to alcohol hand sanitizers had no reported effect in 17,441 (85%) of the younger children. In contrast, 1,005 (50%) of the older children had no reported effect to alcohol hand sanitizer exposure. No deaths were reported. TABLE 2 Most common adverse health effects and outcomes experienced by children with exposure to alcohol and nonalcohol hand sanitizers, by age group — United States, 2011–2014 Characteristic No. (%) Alcohol Nonalcohol Alcohol Nonalcohol Total <5 yrs <5 yrs 6–12 yrs 6–12 yrs Total 59,612 4,876 5,681 500 70,669 Symptoms Reported symptoms 5,867 (9.8) 379 (7.8) 1,836 (32.3) 137 (27.4) 8,219 (11.6) Ocular irritation 1,306 (22.3)* 97 (25.6)* 1,080 (58.8)* 94 (68.6)* 2,577 (31.4) Vomiting 1,606 (27.4)* 129 (34.0)* 129 (7.0) 8 (5.8)* 1,872 (22.8) Red eye/Conjunctivitis 492 (8.4) 33 (8.7) 316 (17.2)* 21 (15.3)* 862 (10.5) Oral irritation 699 (11.9)* 26 (6.9) 55 (3.0) 2 (1.5) 782 (9.5) Cough 651 (11.1) 43 (11.4)* 11 (0.6) 0 (0.0) 705 (8.6) Abdominal pain 173 (3.0) 10 (2.6) 135 (7.4)* 5 (3.7) 323 (3.9) Outcomes No effect 17,441 (29.3) 956 (19.6) 1,005 (17.7) 71 (14.2) 19,473 (27.6) Minor outcome† 2,957 (5.0) 188 (3.9) 962 (16.9) 85 (17.0) 4,192 (5.9) Moderate outcome§ 105 (0.2) 4 (0.1) 45 (0.8) 4 (0.8) 158 (0.2) Major outcome¶ 4 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 1 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 5 (0.0) Not followed 39,105 (65.6) 3,728 (76.5) 3,668 (64.6) 340 (68.0) 46,841 (66.3) * The three most commonly reported symptoms per column. † The patient exhibited some symptoms as a result of the exposure, but they were minimally bothersome to the patient. The symptoms usually resolved rapidly and often involved skin or mucous membrane manifestations. The patient returned to a preexposure state of well-being and had no residual disability or disfigurement. § The patient exhibited symptoms as a result of the exposure that were more pronounced, more prolonged, or more of a systemic nature than minor symptoms. Usually some form of treatment was or would have been indicated. Symptoms were not life-threatening and the patient returned to a preexposure state of well-being with no residual disability or disfigurement. ¶ The patient exhibited symptoms as a result of the exposure that were life-threatening or resulted in significant residual disability or disfigurement. Discussion In this analysis, alcohol hand sanitizer exposures, the majority of which were ingestions, were associated with worse outcomes than nonalcohol hand sanitizer exposures. Older children (aged 6–12 years) were more likely to report intentional ingestion and to have adverse health effects and worse outcomes than were younger children, suggesting that older children might be deliberately misusing or abusing alcohol hand sanitizers. These data also indicate that, among older children, exposures occur less frequently during the summer months. The reason for this seasonal trend is unknown but might be associated with flu season or more ready access to hand sanitizers during the school year. Some schools might require or ask children to purchase and carry hand sanitizers, which might contribute to the higher number of exposures during the school year. A study examining Texas poison center data from 2000 to 2013 found that, among 385 adolescents who ingested hand sanitizer, 35% of ingestions occurred at school ( 10 ). The findings in this report are subject to at least three limitations, which might have led to an underestimate of the total number of alcohol and nonalcohol hand sanitizer exposures. First, calls involving hand sanitizer exposures and another exposure were excluded. Second, the codes indicating an alcohol hand sanitizer exposure also were changed in 2010 and might have been initially underused. Finally, public and health care providers, including emergency department providers, also might not have reported all alcohol or nonalcohol hand sanitizer exposures to poison centers. Moreover, poison center data are also subject to inherent biases such as selection bias (e.g., if poisoning is unrecognized as a cause) or information bias (e.g., recall or interviewer bias). An important example of information bias in this study could be exposure intentionality being incorrectly coded because of inaccurate or subjective history obtained by the caller. Hand washing with soap and water is the recommended method of hand hygiene in non–health care settings. If soap and water are not available, use of a hand sanitizer that contains at least 60% alcohol is suggested. § Other options, such as nonalcohol hand sanitizers or wipes, can be used if soap and water or alcohol hand sanitizers are not available or practical. In September 2016, the Food and Drug Administration issued a rule banning the use of triclosan, triclocarban, and 17 other chemicals in consumer hand and body antibacterial soaps and washes because of health and bacterial resistance concerns. However, this ban does not apply to hand sanitizers, hand wipes, or antibacterial soaps used in a health care setting. ¶ Hand washing with plain soap and water is safe and effective and does not carry these associated risks. Increasing awareness of the potential dangers associated with intentional or unintentional ingestion of alcohol hand sanitizers might help encourage proper use and avoid adverse outcomes. Using alcohol hand sanitizers correctly, under adult supervision, and with proper child safety precautions and making sure they are stored out of reach of young children might reduce unintended adverse consequences. Clinicians evaluating pediatric patients with clinical signs and symptoms consistent with alcohol toxicity, such as nausea, vomiting, respiratory depression, and drowsiness or laboratory results consistent with ethanol or isopropanol toxicity, should consider the possibility of an alcohol hand sanitizer ingestion and contact their local poison control center. Summary What is already known about this topic? Nonrecommended use of alcohol-based (alcohol) hand sanitizers, including intentional or unintentional ingestion, might be associated with greater health risks in young children than similar use of nonalcohol-based (nonalcohol) hand sanitizers. What is added by this report? During 2011–2014, 70,669 exposures to alcohol and nonalcohol hand sanitizers were reported in children aged ≤12 years to the National Poison Data System. Approximately 90% of these exposures occurred among children aged 0–5 years. Among that age group, 97% of exposures were oral ingestions. Children aged 6–12 years had more intentional exposures of alcohol hand sanitizers, suggesting this might be a potential product of abuse among older children. Older children also reported more symptoms and had worse outcomes than did younger children. Major (life-threatening) outcomes were rare. Seasonal trends in data might correlate with increased use during the school year or flu season. What are the implications for public health practice? Caregivers and health care providers need to be aware of the potential risks and dangers associated with improper use of hand sanitizer products among children and the need to use proper safety precautions to protect children. Increased parental or teacher supervision might be needed while using alcohol hand sanitizer products, especially for older children who might be abusing these products during the school year.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Arh Hig Rada Toksikol
                Arh Hig Rada Toksikol
                aiht
                aiht
                Archives of Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology
                Sciendo
                0004-1254
                1848-6312
                September 2020
                06 October 2020
                : 71
                : 3
                : 261-264
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Institute for Medical Research and Occupational Health, Croatian Poison Control Centre, Occupational Health and Environmental Medicine Unit private , Zagreb, Croatia
                Author notes
                [* ] Institute for Medical Research and Occupational Health, Croatian Poison Control Centre, Occupational Health and Environmental Medicine Unit, Ksaverska cesta 2, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia jmacan@ 123456imi.hr
                Article
                aiht-2020-71-3470
                10.2478/aiht-2020-71-3470
                7968494
                33074170
                96949c15-db0f-4f35-b5bd-0e4ad96cc5fe
                © 2020 Željka Babić et al., published by Sciendo

                This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

                History
                : 01 July 2020
                : 01 July 2020
                : 01 August 2020
                Page count
                Pages: 4
                Categories
                Original Article (Short Communication)

                corrosive injury,ethanol,hand sanitisers,hypochlorite,preschool children,korozivna ozljeda,etanol,dezinficijensi,hipoklorit,predškolska djeca

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_

                Similar content118

                Cited by9

                Most referenced authors43