6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Precision management of pollination services to blueberry crops

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          While the cultivated area of pollinator-dependent crops is increasing, pollinator availability is decreasing, leading to problems in many agroecosystems. For this reason, pollinator-dependent crop growers often rent beehives to support their pollination requirements to sustain fruit productivity. However, the efficiency of those pollination systems has not been extensively studied. Here, we compared the effect of “precision” pollination (i.e., application of pesticides coordinated with growers, audit of hives, dietary supplementation and individual distribution of hives) with conventional practices (i.e., pesticides applications without coordination with growers and no audit of hives, low maintenance of hives and hives distributed in large groups) on the mean level of pollination and fruit production and quality in blueberry crops. In nine blueberry fields, we measured bee visitation rate to flowers, fruit set, fruit firmness and fruit weight. On average, precision-pollinated plots had 70% more bee visits to flowers and produced 13% more fruits that were 12% heavier and 12% firmer than those obtained through conventional practices. These results showed that pollination efficiency could be improved if key management related to bee strength, distribution and health care are taken into account. Due to these results, we encourage growers and beekeepers to include precision pollination practices to both increase the productivity of blueberry fields and the wellbeing of honey bees within agroecosystems.

          Related collections

          Most cited references37

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Importance of pollinators in changing landscapes for world crops.

          The extent of our reliance on animal pollination for world crop production for human food has not previously been evaluated and the previous estimates for countries or continents have seldom used primary data. In this review, we expand the previous estimates using novel primary data from 200 countries and found that fruit, vegetable or seed production from 87 of the leading global food crops is dependent upon animal pollination, while 28 crops do not rely upon animal pollination. However, global production volumes give a contrasting perspective, since 60% of global production comes from crops that do not depend on animal pollination, 35% from crops that depend on pollinators, and 5% are unevaluated. Using all crops traded on the world market and setting aside crops that are solely passively self-pollinated, wind-pollinated or parthenocarpic, we then evaluated the level of dependence on animal-mediated pollination for crops that are directly consumed by humans. We found that pollinators are essential for 13 crops, production is highly pollinator dependent for 30, moderately for 27, slightly for 21, unimportant for 7, and is of unknown significance for the remaining 9. We further evaluated whether local and landscape-wide management for natural pollination services could help to sustain crop diversity and production. Case studies for nine crops on four continents revealed that agricultural intensification jeopardizes wild bee communities and their stabilizing effect on pollination services at the landscape scale.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Ecosystem service supply and vulnerability to global change in Europe.

            Global change will alter the supply of ecosystem services that are vital for human well-being. To investigate ecosystem service supply during the 21st century, we used a range of ecosystem models and scenarios of climate and land-use change to conduct a Europe-wide assessment. Large changes in climate and land use typically resulted in large changes in ecosystem service supply. Some of these trends may be positive (for example, increases in forest area and productivity) or offer opportunities (for example, "surplus land" for agricultural extensification and bioenergy production). However, many changes increase vulnerability as a result of a decreasing supply of ecosystem services (for example, declining soil fertility, declining water availability, increasing risk of forest fires), especially in the Mediterranean and mountain regions.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Wild pollinators enhance fruit set of crops regardless of honey bee abundance.

              The diversity and abundance of wild insect pollinators have declined in many agricultural landscapes. Whether such declines reduce crop yields, or are mitigated by managed pollinators such as honey bees, is unclear. We found universally positive associations of fruit set with flower visitation by wild insects in 41 crop systems worldwide. In contrast, fruit set increased significantly with flower visitation by honey bees in only 14% of the systems surveyed. Overall, wild insects pollinated crops more effectively; an increase in wild insect visitation enhanced fruit set by twice as much as an equivalent increase in honey bee visitation. Visitation by wild insects and honey bees promoted fruit set independently, so pollination by managed honey bees supplemented, rather than substituted for, pollination by wild insects. Our results suggest that new practices for integrated management of both honey bees and diverse wild insect assemblages will enhance global crop yields.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                cavigliasso.pablo@inta.gob.ar
                Journal
                Sci Rep
                Sci Rep
                Scientific Reports
                Nature Publishing Group UK (London )
                2045-2322
                14 October 2021
                14 October 2021
                2021
                : 11
                : 20453
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.419231.c, ISNI 0000 0001 2167 7174, Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA), , EEA Concordia - División Frutales, Concordia, ; Entre Ríos, Argentina
                [2 ]GRID grid.423606.5, ISNI 0000 0001 1945 2152, Instituto de Investigaciones en Producción Sanidad y Ambiente (IIPROSAM), , CONICET-UNMdP, Centro de Asociación Simple CIC PBA, ; Buenos Aires, Argentina
                [3 ]GRID grid.412221.6, ISNI 0000 0000 9969 0902, Centro de Investigaciones en Abejas Sociales, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, , Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata, ; Deán Funes, Argentina
                [4 ]Beeflow Inc. - Smart Pollination Services, Los Angeles, CA USA
                [5 ]GRID grid.440497.a, ISNI 0000 0001 2230 8813, Facultad de Ciencias de la Alimentación, , Universidad Nacional de Entre Ríos (UNER), Concordia, ; Entre Ríos, Argentina
                [6 ]GRID grid.412234.2, ISNI 0000 0001 2112 473X, Grupo de Ecología de la Polinización, , INIBIOMA (CONICET-Universidad Nacional del Comahue), ; San Carlos de Bariloche, Rio Negro, Argentina
                Article
                68
                10.1038/s41598-021-00068-1
                8516932
                34650072
                96d46957-27f1-493a-98f6-52b73b352b46
                © The Author(s) 2021

                Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 15 June 2021
                : 28 September 2021
                Funding
                Funded by: INTA - Beeflow Inc.
                Award ID: STE #1565
                Award ID: STE #1565
                Award ID: STE #1565
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100002923, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas;
                Award ID: DVT # 0095
                Award ID: DVT # 0095
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: Beeflow Inc.
                Award ID: PR 4024
                Award ID: PR 4024
                Award ID: PR 4024
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: CONICET - Beeflow Inc.
                Award ID: DI-2019-104-APN-GVT
                Award ID: DI-2019-104-APN-GVT
                Award ID: DI-2019-104-APN-GVT
                Award Recipient :
                Categories
                Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2021

                Uncategorized
                agroecology,plant reproduction
                Uncategorized
                agroecology, plant reproduction

                Comments

                Comment on this article