6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      Call for Papers: Green Renal Replacement Therapy: Caring for the Environment

      Submit here before July 31, 2024

      About Blood Purification: 3.0 Impact Factor I 5.6 CiteScore I 0.83 Scimago Journal & Country Rank (SJR)

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Rapamycin Attenuates the Severity of Murine Adriamycin Nephropathy

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background: Rapamycin is an immunosuppressive drug with potent antifibrotic activity. We evaluated the effect of rapamycin on murine adriamycin nephropathy, a model of progressive glomerulosclerosis and tubulointerstitial fibrosis. Methods: Adriamycin nephropathy was induced in Balb/c mice by a single intravenous injection of adriamycin. The mice were treated orally with either saline or rapamycin, beginning at the time of adriamycin injection or rapamycin starting 1 week after adriamycin injection. The mice were sacrificed 6 weeks after adriamycin injection. Results: Saline-treated mice developed massive proteinuria and impaired renal function. Kidney sections from saline-treated mice showed marked focal segmental glomerulosclerosis, tubular dilation with protein cast deposition, interstitial fibrosis, and numerous infiltrating macrophages and T lymphocytes. The intrarenal expression of Collagen I and RANTES was also increased. In contrast, both groups of rapamycin-treated mice had markedly reduced proteinuria and preserved renal function, with only mild histological abnormalities. The intrarenal expression of Collagen I and RANTES was reduced, concomitant with a significant reduction in interstitial inflammatory cell infiltration. Conclusions: Rapamycin is effective in attenuating the glomerular and tubulointerstitial abnormalities in adriamycin nephropathy<sub>. </sub>The beneficial effects of rapamycin are mediated, at least in part, through reduced RANTES expression and inflammatory cell infiltration.

          Related collections

          Most cited references30

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Renal fibrosis: new insights into the pathogenesis and therapeutics.

          Youhua Liu (2006)
          Renal fibrosis is the inevitable consequence of an excessive accumulation of extracellular matrix that occurs in virtually every type of chronic kidney disease. The pathogenesis of renal fibrosis is a progressive process that ultimately leads to end-stage renal failure, a devastating disorder that requires dialysis or kidney transplantation. In a simplistic view, renal fibrosis represents a failed wound-healing process of the kidney tissue after chronic, sustained injury. Several cellular pathways, including mesangial and fibroblast activation as well as tubular epithelial-mesenchymal transition, have been identified as the major avenues for the generation of the matrix-producing cells in diseased conditions. Among the many fibrogenic factors that regulate renal fibrotic process, transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta) is one that plays a central role. Although defective matrix degradation may contribute to tissue scarring, the exact action and mechanisms of the matrix-degrading enzymes in the injured kidney have become increasingly complicated. Recent discoveries on endogenous antifibrotic factors have evolved novel strategies aimed at antagonizing the fibrogenic action of TGF-beta/Smad signaling. Many therapeutic interventions appear effective in animal models; however, translation of these promising results into humans in the clinical setting remains a daunting task. This mini-review attempts to highlight the recent progress in our understanding of the cellular and molecular pathways leading to renal fibrosis, and discusses the challenges and opportunities in developing therapeutic strategies.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Rapamune (RAPA, rapamycin, sirolimus): mechanism of action immunosuppressive effect results from blockade of signal transduction and inhibition of cell cycle progression.

            Rapamune is a novel immunosuppressive agent in Phase III clinical trial in renal transplantation. Its unique mechanism of action has created great interest in its use as a biochemical probe of signal transduction pathways that has provided insight into its molecular mechanism of action. This article reviews the current state of our understanding of the mechanism of action of rapamune.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              A worldwide, phase III, randomized, controlled, safety and efficacy study of a sirolimus/cyclosporine regimen for prevention of acute rejection in recipients of primary mismatched renal allografts.

              Despite the various immunosuppressive regimens presently in use, acute rejection in the early postoperative period continues to occur in 20 to 40% of renal transplant patients. In a double-blind, multicentred study, we investigated the ability of two different doses of sirolimus (rapamycin, RAPAMUNE), a new class of immunosuppressant that blocks cell cycle progression, to prevent acute rejection in recipients of primary mismatched renal allografts when added to a regimen of cyclosporine (cyclosporin A, CsA) and corticosteroids. Between October 1996 and September 1997, 576 recipients of primary mismatched cadaveric or living donor renal allografts were randomly assigned in a 2:2:1 ratio (before the transplant operation) to receive an initial loading dose of either 6 or 15 mg of orally administered sirolimus, followed by a daily dose of either 2 or 5 mg/day, or to receive a matched placebo. All groups received cyclosporine (microemulsion formula, CsA) and corticosteroids. The primary endpoint was a composite of first occurrence of biopsy-confirmed acute rejection, graft loss, or death during the first 6 months after transplantation. Safety data were monitored by an independent drug safety monitoring board. Based on an intention-to-treat analysis of 576 patients, there were no significant differences in patient demographic or baseline characteristics among treatment groups. The overall rate of the primary composite endpoint for the 6-month period after transplantation was 30.0% (68/227) in the 2 mg/day sirolimus group and 25.6% (56/219) in the 5 mg/day sirolimus group, significantly lower than the 47.7% (62/130) in the placebo group (P=0.002, P<0.001, respectively). During this period, the incidence of biopsy-confirmed acute rejection was 24.7% (56/227) in the 2 mg/day sirolimus group and 19.2% (42/219) in the 5 mg/day sirolimus group, compared with 41.5% (54/130) in the placebo group (P=0.003, P<0.001, respectively), representing a significant reduction in acute rejection of 40.5 and 53.7%, respectively. The need for antibody therapy to treat the first episode of biopsy-confirmed acute rejection was significantly reduced in the 5 mg/ day sirolimus group (3.2%) compared to the placebo group (8.5%; P=0.044). The results 1 year after transplantation were similar for the efficacy parameters studied. Adverse events and infections occurred in all groups. The addition of either 2 mg/day sirolimus or 5 mg/day sirolimus to CsA/corticosteroid therapy significantly reduces the incidence of acute rejection episodes in primary mismatched renal allograft recipients, without an increase in immunosuppressant-related side effects, including infections and malignancy, at 6 months and at 1 year after transplantation.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                AJN
                Am J Nephrol
                10.1159/issn.0250-8095
                American Journal of Nephrology
                S. Karger AG
                0250-8095
                1421-9670
                2009
                March 2009
                27 August 2008
                : 29
                : 4
                : 342-352
                Affiliations
                aDr. Lee Iu Cheung Memorial Renal Research Center, Tung Wah Hospital, Departments of bMedicine and cPathology, The University of Hong Kong, and dDepartment of Clinical Biochemistry, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong SAR, China
                Article
                166599 Am J Nephrol 2009;29:342–352
                10.1159/000166599
                18948688
                96d74fdf-3412-4036-a5d1-29d9a81d9602
                © 2008 S. Karger AG, Basel

                Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug. Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

                History
                : 20 June 2008
                Page count
                Figures: 8, Tables: 3, References: 36, Pages: 11
                Categories
                Original Report: Laboratory Investigation

                Cardiovascular Medicine,Nephrology
                Interstitial fibrosis,Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis,Proteinuria,Glomerulosclerosis

                Comments

                Comment on this article