1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Evaluation of an International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health-based rehabilitation for thermal burn injuries: a prospective non-randomized design

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Severe burn injuries result in relevant restrictions of physical capacity as well as psychological and social integrity and require a specialized rehabilitation. There is a common agreement, among national as well as international burn associations, that burn rehabilitation is a complex, dynamic process which needs an interdisciplinary and specialized treatment team. There is wide agreement that more research is needed in this field.

          Methods/design

          The aim of the study is to examine the effectiveness and efficiency of our new ICF (International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health)-based rehabilitation for thermal injuries. Because of ethical reasons, we have chosen a prospective non-randomized design, which takes place at two different rehabilitation centers. At center A, a newly developed ICF-based rehabilitation program was established; at rehabilitation center B, a well-established rehabilitation program has existed for 20 years and is used as reference. The primary research question addresses the “Pre-post comparison of the physical and psychological outcome measurements,” secondary question I looks at the “Examination of the non-inferiority of the new treatment concept with the established concept,” and secondary question II is the “Analysis of the rehabilitation process based on the rehabilitation cycle.”

          Only patients of the two burn rehabilitation centers who are insured by workers’ compensation will be asked to participate in this study to avoid outcome bias by insurance status. A physical examination (physical working capacity testing, grip strength, range of motion, and scar evaluation by Cutometer and Vancouver Scar Scale) and a standardized questionnaire battery (Burn Specific Health Scale-Brief , Short Form 36, Impact of Event Scale-Revised, the German version of the Symptom Checklist, the Freiburg Social Support Questionnaire, Patient/Client Satisfaction Questionnaire, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand, and Lower Extremity Functional Scale ) measure physical and psychological conditions. Data will be taken on admission, during stay, and on discharge of the rehabilitation program and at follow-up 3 and 12 months after discharge. A minimum of 162 participants will be enrolled in this clinical longitudinal, prospective, observational study.

          Discussion

          The proof of the effectiveness of the ICF-based rehabilitation program for thermal injuries will give evidence in a comprehensive way for the first time in this field. As result, a standardized rehabilitation concept will be introduced, which can be provided to other rehabilitation institutions treating thermal injuries.

          Trial registration

          German Clinical Trials Register, DRKS00017702. Registered on 2 September 2019.

          Related collections

          Most cited references24

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS): scale development, measurement properties, and clinical application. North American Orthopaedic Rehabilitation Research Network.

          The purpose of this study was to assess the reliability, construct validity, and sensitivity to change of the Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS). The LEFS was administered to 107 patients with lower-extremity musculoskeletal dysfunction referred to 12 outpatient physical therapy clinics. The LEFS was administered during the initial assessment, 24 to 48 hours following the initial assessment, and then at weekly intervals for 4 weeks. The SF-36 (acute version) was administered during the initial assessment and at weekly intervals. A type 2,1 intraclass correlation coefficient was used to estimate test-retest reliability. Pearson correlations and one-way analyses of variance were used to examine construct validity. Spearman rank-order correlation coefficients were used to examine the relationship between an independent prognostic rating of change for each patient and change in the LEFS and SF-36 scores. Test-retest reliability of the LEFS scores was excellent (R = .94 [95% lower limit confidence interval (CI) = .89]). Correlations between the LEFS and the SF-36 physical function subscale and physical component score were r=.80 (95% lower limit CI = .73) and r = .64 (95% lower limit CI = .54), respectively. There was a higher correlation between the prognostic rating of change and the LEFS than between the prognostic rating of change and the SF-36 physical function score. The potential error associated with a score on the LEFS at a given point in time is +/-5.3 scale points (90% CI), the minimal detectable change is 9 scale points (90% CI), and the minimal clinically important difference is 9 scale points (90% CI). The LEFS is reliable, and construct validity was supported by comparison with the SF-36. The sensitivity to change of the LEFS was superior to that of the SF-36 in this population. The LEFS is efficient to administer and score and is applicable for research purposes and clinical decision making for individual patients.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            [Satisfaction with inpatient management. Development of a questionnaire and initial validity studies].

            In Germany methodologically reliable procedures to assess patients satisfaction with inpatient health care are almost totally missing. With reference to the well known American CSQ-Questionnaire (Attkisson et al.) a 17-items questionnaire (to assess satisfaction) was developed and presented to a sample of 300 patients undergoing inpatient treatment within a psychosomatic clinic (the rate of responding was about 80%). With a concise form of the questionnaire (Zuf-8, 8 items) an economical and reliable test-instrument is presented in this paper to measure general satisfaction, which also was investigated in regard to item- and factor analysis. This method seems suitable for measuring patient satisfaction with inpatient psychosomatic treatment. The investigated scales of satisfaction show a statistically significant correlation with additionally obtained patient characteristics. This inquiry also suggests that it might be rewarding to pursue the often neglected phenomenon of questionnaires filled out incomplete as an indicator of latent dissatisfaction.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The Vancouver Scar Scale: an administration tool and its interrater reliability.

              The Burn Scar Index, often called the Vancouver Scar Scale, is widely used in clinical practice and research to document change in scar appearance. Several sections of the Index require equipment to accurately score the items. Additionally, the numeric scores are difficult to remember. We recently devised a pocket-sized tool to aid in scoring the scar and to increase staff compliance in use of the Index. With this tool interrater reliability is good, which makes the Burn Scar Index a viable measure for research.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                leila.harhaus@bgu-ludwigshafen.de
                Journal
                Trials
                Trials
                Trials
                BioMed Central (London )
                1745-6215
                19 December 2019
                19 December 2019
                2019
                : 20
                : 752
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2190 4373, GRID grid.7700.0, Department of Hand, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Burn Center, BG Trauma Center Ludwigshafen, Plastic- and Hand Surgery, , University of Heidelberg, ; Ludwig-Guttmann-Str. 13, 67071 Ludwigshafen, Germany
                [2 ]GRID grid.491940.1, Moritz Klinik, ; Hermann-Sachse-Strasse 46, 07639 Bad Klosterlausnitz, Germany
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7061-0512
                Article
                3910
                10.1186/s13063-019-3910-6
                6923835
                31856888
                96d7a95c-b2b7-45c2-9407-436a89a6687c
                © The Author(s). 2019

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 4 September 2019
                : 15 November 2019
                Funding
                Funded by: DGUV
                Award ID: 412.02-FR-0234
                Award Recipient :
                Categories
                Study Protocol
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2019

                Medicine
                rehabilitation,thermal injuries,burn injuries,icf
                Medicine
                rehabilitation, thermal injuries, burn injuries, icf

                Comments

                Comment on this article