15
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Alectinib versus chemotherapy in crizotinib-pretreated anaplastic lymphoma kinase ( ALK)-positive non-small-cell lung cancer: results from the phase III ALUR study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          This is the first trial to directly compare efficacy and safety of alectinib versus standard chemotherapy in advanced/metastatic anaplastic lymphoma kinase ( ALK)-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who have progressed on, or were intolerant to, crizotinib.

          Patients and methods

          ALUR (MO29750; NCT02604342) was a randomized, multicenter, open-label, phase III trial of alectinib versus chemotherapy in advanced/metastatic ALK-positive NSCLC patients previously treated with platinum-based doublet chemotherapy and crizotinib. Patients were randomized 2 : 1 to receive alectinib 600 mg twice daily or chemotherapy (pemetrexed 500 mg/m 2 or docetaxel 75 mg/m 2, both every 3 weeks) until disease progression, death, or withdrawal. Primary end point was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS).

          Results

          Altogether, 107 patients were randomized (alectinib, n = 72; chemotherapy, n = 35) in 13 countries across Europe and Asia. Median investigator-assessed PFS was 9.6 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 6.9–12.2] with alectinib and 1.4 months (95% CI: 1.3–1.6) with chemotherapy [hazard ratio (HR) 0.15 (95% CI: 0.08–0.29); P < 0.001]. Independent Review Committee-assessed PFS was also significantly longer with alectinib [HR 0.32 (95% CI: 0.17–0.59); median PFS was 7.1 months (95% CI: 6.3–10.8) with alectinib and 1.6 months (95% CI: 1.3–4.1) with chemotherapy]. In patients with measurable baseline central nervous system (CNS) disease (alectinib, n = 24; chemotherapy, n = 16), CNS objective response rate was significantly higher with alectinib (54.2%) versus chemotherapy (0%; P < 0.001). Grade ≥3 adverse events were more common with chemotherapy (41.2%) than alectinib (27.1%). Incidence of AEs leading to study-drug discontinuation was lower with alectinib (5.7%) than chemotherapy (8.8%), despite alectinib treatment duration being longer (20.1 weeks versus 6.0 weeks).

          Conclusion

          Alectinib significantly improved systemic and CNS efficacy versus chemotherapy for crizotinib-pretreated ALK-positive NSCLC patients, with a favorable safety profile.

          Trial registration

          ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02604342; Roche study MO29750

          Related collections

          Most cited references11

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Alectinib versus crizotinib in patients with ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (J-ALEX): an open-label, randomised phase 3 trial.

          Alectinib, a potent, highly selective, CNS-active inhibitor of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK), showed promising efficacy and tolerability in the single-arm phase 1/2 AF-001JP trial in Japanese patients with ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer. Given those promising results, we did a phase 3 trial to directly compare the efficacy and safety of alectinib and crizotinib.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Alectinib in Crizotinib-Refractory ALK-Rearranged Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Phase II Global Study.

            Crizotinib confers improved progression-free survival compared with chemotherapy in anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-rearranged non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but progression invariably occurs. We investigated the efficacy and safety of alectinib, a potent and selective ALK inhibitor with excellent CNS penetration, in patients with crizotinib-refractory ALK-positive NSCLC.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Phase 2 prospective analysis of alectinib in ALK-positive, crizotinib-resistant non-small-cell lung cancer

              Summary Background Alectinib, a highly selective, central nervous system (CNS)-active anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitor, demonstrated promising clinical activity in crizotinib-naïve and crizotinib-resistant ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This phase 2 study evaluated the safety and efficacy of alectinib in ALK-positive NSCLC patients who progressed on previous crizotinib. Methods This ongoing North American study (NCT01871805) enrolled patients with stage IIIB/IV ALK-positive NSCLC, who had progressed following crizotinib. Patients were treated with oral alectinib 600 mg twice daily until progression, death or withdrawal. Primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR) by independent review committee (IRC) using RECIST v1.1. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), duration of response (DOR), intracranial ORR and DOR, safety, and patient-reported outcomes. The intent-to-treat population was used for efficacy and safety analyses, with the response evaluable population used for response endpoints. Findings A total of 87 patients were enrolled in the intent-to-treat population. All patients had received prior crizotinib therapy, and 64 patients (74%) had also received prior chemotherapy. Fifty-two patients (60%) had baseline CNS metastases, of whom 18 (35%) had received no prior brain radiation therapy. At the time of primary analysis (median follow-up 4.8 months), ORR by IRC was 48% (95% CI 36–60). Adverse events were predominantly grade 1 or 2, most commonly constipation, fatigue, myalgia and peripheral edema. The most common grade ≥3 AEs were changes in laboratory values, including increased blood creatine phosphokinase (in 8%, n=7), increased alanine aminotransferase (in 6% n=5), and increased aspartate aminotransferase (in 5% n=4). Interpretation Alectinib demonstrated clinical efficacy and was well tolerated in patients with ALK-positive NSCLC who had progressed on crizotinib. Alectinib was active in the CNS, as demonstrated by durable responses in the majority of crizotinib-resistant patients with CNS disease. Therefore, alectinib could be a suitable treatment for patients with ALK-positive disease who have progressed on crizotinib.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Ann Oncol
                Ann. Oncol
                annonc
                Annals of Oncology
                Oxford University Press
                0923-7534
                1569-8041
                June 2018
                14 April 2018
                14 April 2018
                : 29
                : 6
                : 1409-1416
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Oncology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
                [2 ]Department of Pneumology, Toulouse University Hospital, Paul Sabatier University, Toulouse, France
                [3 ]Department of Internal Medicine, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, Hwasun-gun Jeollanam-do, Republic of Korea
                [4 ]Department of Translational Oncology, La Paz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
                [5 ]Azienda Ospedaliera San Camillo Forlanini Hospital, Rome, Italy
                [6 ]Department of Cancer Genetics and Department of Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
                [7 ]Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland
                [8 ]Department of Hematology and Oncology, Pius Hospital, Medical Campus University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany
                [9 ]F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., Basel, Switzerland
                [10 ]Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
                Author notes
                Correspondence to: Prof. Jürgen Wolf, Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology, University Hospital Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937 Köln, Cologne, Germany. Tel: +49-221-478-89050; Fax: +49-221-478-89050; E-mail: juergen.wolf@ 123456uk-koeln.de
                Article
                mdy121
                10.1093/annonc/mdy121
                6005013
                29668860
                96e5cb43-5f75-4618-b17d-bc8ba462d986
                © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com

                History
                Page count
                Pages: 8
                Funding
                Funded by: F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd
                Categories
                Original Articles
                Thoracic Tumors
                Editor's Choice

                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                alectinib,alk,chemotherapy,crizotinib,nsclc
                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                alectinib, alk, chemotherapy, crizotinib, nsclc

                Comments

                Comment on this article