14
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The effect of a conditional cash transfer on HIV incidence in young women in rural South Africa (HPTN 068): a phase 3, randomised controlled trial

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Summary
          Background

          Cash transfers have been proposed as an intervention to reduce HIV-infection risk for young women in sub-Saharan Africa. However, scarce evidence is available about their effect on reducing HIV acquisition. We aimed to assess the effect of a conditional cash transfer on HIV incidence among young women in rural South Africa.

          Methods

          We did a phase 3, randomised controlled trial (HPTN 068) in the rural Bushbuckridge subdistrict in Mpumalanga province, South Africa. We included girls aged 13–20 years if they were enrolled in school grades 8–11, not married or pregnant, able to read, they and their parent or guardian both had the necessary documentation necessary to open a bank account, and were residing in the study area and intending to remain until trial completion. Young women (and their parents or guardians) were randomly assigned (1:1), by use of numbered sealed envelopes containing a randomisation assignment card which were numerically ordered with block randomisation, to receive a monthly cash transfer conditional on school attendance (≥80% of school days per month) versus no cash transfer. Participants completed an Audio Computer-Assisted Self-Interview (ACASI), before test HIV counselling, HIV and herpes simplex virus (HSV)-2 testing, and post-test counselling at baseline, then at annual follow-up visits at 12, 24, and 36 months. Parents or guardians completed a Computer-Assisted Personal Interview at baseline and each follow-up visit. A stratified proportional hazards model was used in an intention-to-treat analysis of the primary outcome, HIV incidence, to compare the intervention and control groups. This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01233531).

          Findings

          Between March 5, 2011, and Dec 17, 2012, we recruited 10 134 young women and enrolled 2537 and their parents or guardians to receive a cash transfer programme (n=1225) or not (control group; n=1223). At baseline, the median age of girls was 15 years (IQR 14–17) and 672 (27%) had reported to have ever had sex. 107 incident HIV infections were recorded during the study: 59 cases in 3048 person-years in the intervention group and 48 cases in 2830 person-years in the control group. HIV incidence was not significantly different between those who received a cash transfer (1.94% per person-years) and those who did not (1.70% per person-years; hazard ratio 1.17, 95% CI 0.80–1.72, p=0.42).

          Interpretation

          Cash transfers conditional on school attendance did not reduce HIV incidence in young women. School attendance significantly reduced risk of HIV acquisition, irrespective of study group. Keeping girls in school is important to reduce their HIV-infection risk.

          Funding

          National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institute of Mental Health of the National Institutes of Health.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          101613665
          42402
          Lancet Glob Health
          Lancet Glob Health
          The Lancet. Global health
          2214-109X
          21 September 2017
          01 November 2016
          December 2016
          01 December 2017
          : 4
          : 12
          : e978-e988
          Affiliations
          Department of Epidemiology (A Pettifor PhD), Carolina Population Center (A Pettifor, A Selin MHS, Prof C Suchindran PhD), and Department of Biostatistics (Prof C Suchindran), University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Medical Research Council/Wits Rural Public Health and Health Transitions Research Unit, School of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences (A Pettifor, C MacPhail PhD, F X Gómez-Olivé PhD, R G Wagner PhD, W Mabuza BSc, I Mokoena BS, R Twine MPH, Prof S Tollman PhD, Prof K Kahn PhD), and Wits Reproductive Health and HIV Institute (A Pettifor, C MacPhail, N Khoza MS), University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa; School of Health, University of New England, Armidale, NSW, Australia (C MacPhail); Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA (J Wang MS, Prof J P Hughes PhD); Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA (Prof J P Hughes); Department of Pathology (Prof S H Eshleman MD, Y Agyei BS), and Departments of Medicine and Epidemiology (O Laeyendecker PhD), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA; FHI 360, Durham, NC, USA (P Andrew RN); Division of AIDS–Henry M Jackson Foundation, Contractor to the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Baltimore, MD, USA (E Townley MSN); Laboratory of Immunoregulation, NIAID, NIH, Baltimore, MD, USA (O Laeyendecker); Umeå Centre for Global Health Research, Umeå, Sweden (R G Wagner, Prof S Tollman, Prof K Kahn); and INDEPTH Network, Accra, Ghana (R G Wagner, S Tollman, K Kahn)
          Author notes
          Correspondence to: Dr Audrey Pettifor, Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA, apettif@ 123456email.unc.edu
          Article
          PMC5626439 PMC5626439 5626439 nihpa829206
          10.1016/S2214-109X(16)30253-4
          5626439
          27815148
          96ea32f0-cd58-4628-a163-f43fce7de769

          This is an Open Access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license

          History
          Categories
          Article

          Comments

          Comment on this article