138
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Higher levels of multiple ecosystem services are found in forests with more tree species

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Forests are of major importance to human society, contributing several crucial ecosystem services. Biodiversity is suggested to positively influence multiple services but evidence from natural systems at scales relevant to management is scarce. Here, across a scale of 400,000 km 2, we report that tree species richness in production forests shows positive to positively hump-shaped relationships with multiple ecosystem services. These include production of tree biomass, soil carbon storage, berry production and game production potential. For example, biomass production was approximately 50% greater with five than with one tree species. In addition, we show positive relationships between tree species richness and proxies for other biodiversity components. Importantly, no single tree species was able to promote all services, and some services were negatively correlated to each other. Management of production forests will therefore benefit from considering multiple tree species to sustain the full range of benefits that the society obtains from forests.

          Abstract

          Tree diversity is thought to benefit forest ecosystems, but evidence from large-scale studies is scarce. This study of a 400,000 km 2 forest area shows that higher tree species richness supports higher levels of multiple ecosystem services, and therefore also a more sustainable management of production forests.

          Related collections

          Most cited references36

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Modeling multiple ecosystem services, biodiversity conservation, commodity production, and tradeoffs at landscape scales

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            High plant diversity is needed to maintain ecosystem services.

            Biodiversity is rapidly declining worldwide, and there is consensus that this can decrease ecosystem functioning and services. It remains unclear, though, whether few or many of the species in an ecosystem are needed to sustain the provisioning of ecosystem services. It has been hypothesized that most species would promote ecosystem services if many times, places, functions and environmental changes were considered; however, no previous study has considered all of these factors together. Here we show that 84% of the 147 grassland plant species studied in 17 biodiversity experiments promoted ecosystem functioning at least once. Different species promoted ecosystem functioning during different years, at different places, for different functions and under different environmental change scenarios. Furthermore, the species needed to provide one function during multiple years were not the same as those needed to provide multiple functions within one year. Our results indicate that even more species will be needed to maintain ecosystem functioning and services than previously suggested by studies that have either (1) considered only the number of species needed to promote one function under one set of environmental conditions, or (2) separately considered the importance of biodiversity for providing ecosystem functioning across multiple years, places, functions or environmental change scenarios. Therefore, although species may appear functionally redundant when one function is considered under one set of environmental conditions, many species are needed to maintain multiple functions at multiple times and places in a changing world.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Ecosystem service bundles for analyzing tradeoffs in diverse landscapes.

              A key challenge of ecosystem management is determining how to manage multiple ecosystem services across landscapes. Enhancing important provisioning ecosystem services, such as food and timber, often leads to tradeoffs between regulating and cultural ecosystem services, such as nutrient cycling, flood protection, and tourism. We developed a framework for analyzing the provision of multiple ecosystem services across landscapes and present an empirical demonstration of ecosystem service bundles, sets of services that appear together repeatedly. Ecosystem service bundles were identified by analyzing the spatial patterns of 12 ecosystem services in a mixed-use landscape consisting of 137 municipalities in Quebec, Canada. We identified six types of ecosystem service bundles and were able to link these bundles to areas on the landscape characterized by distinct social-ecological dynamics. Our results show landscape-scale tradeoffs between provisioning and almost all regulating and cultural ecosystem services, and they show that a greater diversity of ecosystem services is positively correlated with the provision of regulating ecosystem services. Ecosystem service-bundle analysis can identify areas on a landscape where ecosystem management has produced exceptionally desirable or undesirable sets of ecosystem services.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Nat Commun
                Nat Commun
                Nature Communications
                Nature Pub. Group
                2041-1723
                08 January 2013
                : 4
                : 1340
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences , Box 7044, SE-75007 Uppsala, Sweden
                [2 ]Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Gothenburg , Box 461, SE-40530 Gothenburg, Sweden
                [3 ]Department of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, Durham University , South Road, Durham DH1 3LE, UK
                [4 ]Department of Ecology and Environmental Science, Umeå University , SE-90187 Umeå, Sweden
                [5 ]Grimsö Wildlife Research Station, Department of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences , SE-730 91 Riddarhyttan, Sweden
                [6 ]Environmental Change Institute , South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3QY, UK
                [7 ]Department of Aquatic Sciences and Assessment, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences , Box 7082, SE-75007 Uppsala, Sweden
                [8 ]Department of Soil and Environment, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences , Box 7014, SE-75007 Uppsala, Sweden
                [9 ]Institute of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies, University of Zurich , Winterhurerstrasse 190, 8057 Zurich, Switzerland
                [10 ]Southern Swedish Forest Research Centre, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences , Box 49, SE-23053 Alnarp, Sweden
                [11 ]Stockholm Resilience Centre, Stockholm University , SE-10691 Stockholm, Sweden
                [12 ]Department of Forest Resource Management, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences , Box 7001, SE-90183 Umeå, Sweden
                Author notes
                Article
                ncomms2328
                10.1038/ncomms2328
                3562447
                23299890
                971936fe-a3ae-41cf-b37c-dfbc67e04705
                Copyright © 2013, Nature Publishing Group, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited. All Rights Reserved.

                This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/

                History
                : 07 June 2012
                : 26 November 2012
                Categories
                Article

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article