5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Conventional tillage decreases the abundance and biomass of earthworms and alters their community structure in a global meta-analysis.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The adoption of less intensive soil cultivation practices is expected to increase earthworm populations and their contributions to ecosystem functioning. However, conflicting results have been reported on the effects of tillage intensity on earthworm populations, attributed in narrative reviews to site-dependent differences in soil properties, climatic conditions, and agronomic operations (e.g., fertilization, residue management and chemical crop protection). We present a quantitative review based on a global meta-analysis, using paired observations from 215 studies performed over 65 years (1950-2016) across 40 countries on five continents, to elucidate this long-standing unresolved issue. Results showed that disturbing the soil less (e.g., no-tillage and Conservation Agriculture) significantly increased earthworm abundance (mean increase of 137% and 127%, respectively) and biomass (196% and 101%, respectively) compared to when the soil is inverted by conventional ploughing. Earthworm population responses were more pronounced when the soil had been under reduced tillage for a long time (>10 years), in warm temperate zones with fine-textured soils, and in soils with higher clay contents (>35%) and low pH (<5.5). Furthermore, retaining organic harvest residues amplified this positive response to reduced tillage, whereas the use of the herbicide glyphosate did not significantly affect earthworm population responses to reduced tillage. Additional meta-analyses confirmed that epigeic and, more importantly, the bigger-sized anecic earthworms, were the most sensitive ecological groups to conventional tillage. In particular, the deep burrower Lumbricus terrestris exhibited the strongest positive response to reduced tillage, increasing in abundance by 124% more than the overall mean of all 13 species analysed individually. The restoration of these two important ecological groups of earthworms and their burrowing, feeding and casting activities under various forms of reduced tillage will ensure the provision of ecosystem functions such as soil structure maintenance and nutrient cycling by "nature's plough". This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Glob Chang Biol
          Global change biology
          Wiley-Blackwell
          1365-2486
          1354-1013
          May 02 2017
          Affiliations
          [1 ] Departamento de Ecología y Biología Animal, Universidad de Vigo, 36310, Vigo, Spain.
          [2 ] Centre for Ecology and Hydrology Lancaster, Library Avenue, Bailrigg, Lancaster, LA1 4AP, United Kingdom.
          [3 ] UCD School of Agriculture and Food Science, and UCD Earth Institute, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland.
          Article
          10.1111/gcb.13744
          28464547
          9743002b-d30e-4ce1-ab79-da69a5703c0f
          History

          Oligochaeta,agricultural management,community composition,ecological groupings,tillage systems

          Comments

          Comment on this article