+1 Recommend
1 collections
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Localisation of Haematuria by Red Cell Analysers and Phase Contrast Microscopy

      Read this article at

          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.


          The urinary erythrocyte morphology of 120 patients with haematuria of diagnosed cause (41 glomerular, 79 non-glomerular) was examined by red cell analyser (RCA) and by phase contrast microscopy (PCM). By RCA three distinct ranges of modal erythrocyte cell volume (ECV) were observed. The modal ECVs in glomerular haematuria (35–50 fl) were significantly lower than in non-glomerular haematuria (65–148 fl) and both were clearly distinct from ‘debris patterns’ (12–33 fl). In duplicate specimens very similar ECVs were observed before and after centrifugation and after storage for up to 15 h. There was no correlation between the modal urinary ECV and the urinary specific gravity or the peripheral venous ECV. The source of the haematuria (glomerular or non-glomerular) was identified correctly by RCA (PCM) in 100% (60%), 68% (71%) and 22% (39%), respectively, of patients with macroscopic, 3 + microscopic and 1–2+ microscopic haematuria. In no patient was the haematuria localised incorrectly by RCA as compared with 10% incorrect localisation by PCM. RCA and PCM are complementary non-invase tests and both should be performed whenever possible in the investigation of haematuria.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          S. Karger AG
          10 December 2008
          : 52
          : 2
          : 170-173
          aDepartment of Renal Medicine and bDepartment of Haematology, Royal United Hospital, Bath, UK
          185623 Nephron 1989;52:170–173
          © 1989 S. Karger AG, Basel

          Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug. Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

          Page count
          Pages: 4
          Original Paper


          Comment on this article