21
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      CD8 T cell memory: it takes all kinds

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Understanding the mechanisms that regulate the differentiation and maintenance of CD8 + memory T cells is fundamental to the development of effective T cell-based vaccines. Memory cell differentiation is influenced by the cytokines that accompany T cell priming, the history of previous antigen encounters, and the tissue sites into which memory cells migrate. These cues combine to influence the developing CD8 + memory pool, and recent work has revealed the importance of multiple transcription factors, metabolic molecules, and surface receptors in revealing the type of memory cell that is generated. Paired with increasingly meticulous subsetting and sorting of memory populations, we now know the CD8 + memory pool to be phenotypically and functionally heterogeneous in nature. This includes both recirculating and tissue-resident memory populations, and cells with varying degrees of inherent longevity and protective function. These data point to the importance of tailored vaccine design. Here we discuss how the diversity of the memory CD8 + T cell pool challenges the notion that “one size fits all” for pathogen control, and how distinct memory subsets may be suited for distinct aspects of protective immunity.

          Related collections

          Most cited references43

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Lineage relationship and protective immunity of memory CD8 T cell subsets.

          Memory CD8 T cells can be divided into two subsets, central (T(CM)) and effector (T(EM)), but their lineage relationships and their ability to persist and confer protective immunity are not well understood. Our results show that T(CM) have a greater capacity than T(EM) to persist in vivo and are more efficient in mediating protective immunity because of their increased proliferative potential. We also demonstrate that, following antigen clearance, T(EM) convert to T(CM) and that the duration of this differentiation is programmed within the first week after immunization. We propose that T(CM) and T(EM) do not necessarily represent distinct subsets, but are part of a continuum in a linear naive --> effector --> T(EM) --> T(CM) differentiation pathway.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Effector-memory T cell responses are associated with protection of rhesus monkeys from mucosal SIV challenge

            The rapid onset of massive, systemic viral replication during primary HIV/SIV infection and the immune evasion capabilities of these viruses pose fundamental problems for vaccines that depend upon initial viral replication to stimulate effector T cell expansion and differentiation1–5. We hypothesized that vaccines designed to maintain differentiated “effector memory” T cell (TEM) responses5,6 at viral entry sites might improve efficacy by impairing viral replication at its earliest stage2, and have therefore developed SIV protein-encoding vectors based on rhesus cytomegalovirus (RhCMV), the prototypical inducer of life-long TEM responses7–9. RhCMV vectors expressing SIV Gag, Rev/Nef/Tat, and Env persistently infected rhesus macaques (RM), regardless of pre-existing RhCMV immunity, and primed and maintained robust SIV-specific, CD4+ and CD8+ TEM responses (characterized by coordinate TNF, IFN-γ and MIP-1β expression, cytotoxic degranulation, and accumulation at extra-lymphoid sites) in the absence of neutralizing antibodies. Compared to control RM, these vaccinated RM showed increased resistance to acquisition of progressive SIVmac239 infection upon repeated, limiting dose, intra-rectal challenge, including four animals that controlled rectal mucosal infection without progressive systemic dissemination. These data suggest a new paradigm for AIDS vaccine development: that vaccines capable of generating and maintaining HIV-specific TEM might decrease the incidence of HIV acquisition after sexual exposure.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Effectors and memories: Bcl-6 and Blimp-1 in T and B lymphocyte differentiation.

              Bcl-6 and Blimp-1 have recently been identified as key transcriptional regulators of effector and memory differentiation in CD4(+) T cells and CD8(+) T cells. Bcl-6 and Blimp-1 were previously known to be critical regulators of effector and memory differentiation of B lymphocytes. The new findings unexpectedly point to the Bcl-6 and Blimp-1 regulatory axis as a ubiquitous mechanism for controlling effector and memory lymphocyte differentiation and function. Bcl-6 and Blimp-1 are antagonistic transcription factors and can function as a self-reinforcing genetic switch for cell-fate decisions. However, their influences in different lymphocytes are complex. Here we review and examine the commonalities and differences in the functions of these transcription factors in CD4(+) follicular helper T(FH) lymphocytes, effector CD8(+) T lymphocytes and B lymphocytes.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Front Immunol
                Front Immunol
                Front. Immun.
                Frontiers in Immunology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-3224
                27 November 2012
                2012
                : 3
                : 353
                Affiliations
                Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Center for Immunology, University of Minnesota Medical School Minneapolis, MN, USA
                Author notes

                Edited by: Erika Cretney, The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Australia

                Reviewed by: Tania H. Watts, University of Toronto, Canada; Koichi Araki, Emory University School of Medicine, USA; Jeffrey C. Nolz, University of Iowa, USA

                *Correspondence: Stephen C. Jameson and Sara E. Hamilton, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Center for Immunology, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN 55414, USA. e-mail: james026@ 123456umn.edu ; hamil062@ 123456umn.edu

                This article was submitted to Frontiers in Immunological Memory, a specialty of Frontiers in Immunology.

                Article
                10.3389/fimmu.2012.00353
                3515884
                23230436
                975963de-5f11-49e8-a45c-511c6c277f58
                Copyright © Hamilton and Jameson.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in other forums, provided the original authors and source are credited and subject to any copyright notices concerning any third-party graphics etc.

                History
                : 31 August 2012
                : 06 November 2012
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 78, Pages: 7, Words: 0
                Categories
                Immunology
                Review Article

                Immunology
                immune memory,cd8 t cells,protective immunity,host-pathogen interactions,t cell differentiation

                Comments

                Comment on this article