7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Patient and primary care delays in the diagnostic pathway of gynaecological cancers: a systematic review of influencing factors

      research-article
      , MRCGP , MSc, PhD, FRCGP , BPharm (Hons), MEd, PhD, FRCGP
      The British Journal of General Practice
      Royal College of General Practitioners
      delayed diagnosis, gynaecological cancer, primary health care, systematic review

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Gynaecological cancers are the second most common female cancer type, with survival rates in the UK lower than in many comparable countries. A potentially important factor in the UK’s poorer cancer outcomes is diagnostic delay; gynaecological cancers are the cancer type most likely to be affected by less timely diagnosis.

          Aim

          To examine current evidence for factors that contribute to patient and primary care delays in the diagnostic pathway of gynaecological cancer.

          Design and setting

          A systematic review of the available literature.

          Method

          PRISMA guidelines were followed. MEDLINE and Embase databases and the Cochrane Library were searched using three terms: primary care; gynaecological cancer; and delay. Citation lists of all identified articles were searched. Two authors independently screened the titles, abstracts, and full texts of publications. Data extraction was performed by one author and quality assured by a second reviewer in a 20% sample of selected articles. Synthesis was narrative.

          Results

          A total of 1253 references was identified, of which 37 met the inclusion criteria. Factors associated with delayed diagnosis were categorised as either patient factors (patient demographics, symptoms or knowledge, and presentation to the GP) or primary care factors (doctor factors: patient demographics, symptoms or knowledge, and referral process); and system factors (such as limited access to investigations).

          Conclusion

          Delayed diagnosis in the patient and primary care intervals of the diagnostic journey of gynaecological cancer is complex and multifactorial. This review identifies areas of future research that could lead to interventions to enable prompter diagnosis of gynaecological cancers.

          Related collections

          Most cited references29

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Factors predicting delayed presentation of symptomatic breast cancer: a systematic review.

          Delayed presentation of symptomatic breast cancer is associated with lower survival. Understanding of the factors that influence delay is important for the development of strategies to shorten delays. We did a systematic review to assess the quality and strength of evidence on risk factors for delays by patients and providers. We generated hypotheses about the relation between each putative risk factor and delay, against which we tested studies. We did searches to identify papers containing original data related to risk factors for delays by patients (n=86) and providers (n=28). We critically appraised the papers for inclusion in the review according to predefined criteria. The small number of studies of adequate quality did not allow formal meta-analysis. We therefore assigned strength of evidence according to a combination of the number and size of studies supporting, not supporting, or refuting the hypotheses. Most studies were deemed to be of poor quality and were excluded. Among 23 studies of adequate quality, however, there was strong evidence for an association between older age and delay by patients, and strong evidence that marital status was unrelated to delays by patients. Younger age and presentation with a breast symptom other than a lump were strong risk factors for delays by providers. Moderate evidence was shown for several other factors. The strength of the current evidence is inadequate to inform the development of specific strategies to shorten delays by patients or providers. Clarification of the findings of this review through a major programme of primary research is urgently required.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Ovarian carcinoma diagnosis.

            Ovarian carcinoma often is called the "silent killer" because the disease usually is not detected until an advanced stage. The authors' goal was to evaluate preoperative symptoms and factors that may contribute to delayed diagnosis for women with ovarian carcinoma. A two-page survey was distributed to 1500 women who subscribe to CONVERSATIONS!, a newsletter about ovarian carcinoma. Because the survey could be copied and given to other patients, 1725 surveys were returned from women in 46 states and 4 Canadian provinces. The median age of the surveyed women was 52 years, and 70% had Stage III or IV disease (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics). When asked about symptoms before the diagnosis of ovarian carcinoma, 95% reported symptoms, which were categorized as abdominal (77%), gastrointestinal (70%), pain (58%), constitutional (50%), urinary (34%), and pelvic (26%). Only 11% of women with Stage I/II and 3% with Stage III/IV reported no symptoms before their diagnosis. Women who ignored their symptoms were significantly more likely to be diagnosed with advanced disease compared with those who did not (P = 0.002). The time required for a health care provider to make the diagnosis was reported as less than 3 months by 55%, but greater than 6 months by 26% and greater than 1 year by 11%. Factors significantly associated with delay in diagnosis were omission of a pelvic exam at first visit; having a multitude of symptoms; being diagnosed initially with no problem, depression, stress, irritable bowel, or gastritis; not initially receiving an ultrasound, computed tomography, or CA 125 test; and younger age. The type of health care provider seen initially, insurance, and specific symptoms did not correlate with delayed diagnosis. This large national survey confirms that the majority of women with ovarian carcinoma are symptomatic and frequently have delays in diagnosis. Copyright 2000 American Cancer Society.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Sociodemographic factors and delays in the diagnosis of six cancers: analysis of data from the ‘National Survey of NHS Patients: Cancer'

              This paper aims to explore the relationship between sociodemographic factors and the components of diagnostic delay (total, patient and primary care, referral, secondary care) for these six cancers (breast, colorectal, lung, ovarian, prostate, or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma). Secondary analysis of patient-reported data from the ‘National Survey of NHS patients: Cancer' was undertaken (65 192 patients). Data were analysed using univariate analysis and Generalised Linear Modelling. With regard to total delay, the findings from the GLM showed that for colorectal cancer, the significant factors were marital status and age, for lung and ovarian cancer none of the factors were significant, for prostate cancer the only significant factor was social class, for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma the only significant factor was age, and for breast cancer the significant factors were marital status and ethnic group. Where associations between any of the component delays were found, the direction of the association was always in the same direction (female subjects had longer delays than male subjects, younger people had longer delays than older people, single and separated/divorced people had longer delays than married people, lower social class groups had longer delays than higher social class groups, and Black and south Asian people had longer delays than white people). These findings should influence the design of interventions aimed at reducing diagnostic delays with the aim of improving morbidity, mortality, and psychological outcomes through earlier stage diagnosis.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: GP and CSO clinical academic training fellow
                Role: GP and professor in primary care
                Role: Emeritus professor in primary care
                Journal
                Br J Gen Pract
                Br J Gen Pract
                bjgp
                The British Journal of General Practice
                Royal College of General Practitioners
                0960-1643
                1478-5242
                February 2019
                15 January 2019
                15 January 2019
                : 69
                : 679
                : e106-e111
                Affiliations
                Academic Primary Care, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen.
                Academic Primary Care, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen.
                Academic Primary Care, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen.
                Author notes
                Address for correspondence Pauline Williams, Academic Primary Care, Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Room 1:010, Polwarth Building, Foresterhill, Aberdeen AB25 2ZD, UK. Email: pauline.williams@ 123456abdn.ac.uk
                Article
                10.3399/bjgp19X700781
                6355279
                30642909
                977a3894-20b0-499f-b0fd-9677dd9a00eb
                © British Journal of General Practice 2019

                This article is Open Access: CC BY-NC 4.0 licence ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).

                History
                : 14 June 2018
                : 13 July 2018
                : 24 September 2018
                Categories
                Research

                delayed diagnosis,gynaecological cancer,primary health care,systematic review

                Comments

                Comment on this article