11
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Detection of the mecA gene and identification of Staphylococcus directly from blood culture bottles by multiplex polymerase chain reaction

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction

          Staphylococcus spp. – both S. aureus, including methicillin-resistant strains (MRSA) and coagulase negative staphylococci (CoNS) – are relevant agents of healthcare-associated infections. Therefore, the rapid recognition of MRSA and methicillin-resistant CoNS from blood stream infections is critically important for patient management. It is worth noting that inappropriate empiric therapy has been associated with higher in-hospital mortality.

          Material and methods

          In this study we evaluated a multiplex polymerase chain reaction (multiplex PCR) standardized to detect Staphylococcus spp., S. aureus, and mecA gene-encoded oxacillin resistance directly from blood culture bottles. A total of 371 blood cultures with Gram-positive microorganisms confirmed by Gram-stain were analyzed. Results from multiplex PCR were compared to phenotypic characterization of isolates.

          Results

          Staphylococcus aureus was detected in 85 (23.0%) blood cultures and CoNS in 286 (77.0%). There was 100% agreement between phenotypic and multiplex PCR identification. Forty-three (50.6%) of the 85 S. aureus carried the mecA gene and among the 286 CoNS, 225 (78.7%) were positive for the mecA gene.

          Conclusions

          The multiplex PCR assay developed here was found to be sensitive, specific, rapid, and showed good agreement with the phenotypic results besides being less expensive. This PCR method could be used in clinical laboratories for rapid identification and initiation of specific and effective treatment, reducing patient mortality and morbidity. Furthermore, this method may reduce misuse of antimicrobial classes that are more expensive and toxic, thus contributing to the selection of antibiotic-resistant Staphylococcus spp.

          Related collections

          Most cited references28

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Multistate point-prevalence survey of health care-associated infections.

          Currently, no single U.S. surveillance system can provide estimates of the burden of all types of health care-associated infections across acute care patient populations. We conducted a prevalence survey in 10 geographically diverse states to determine the prevalence of health care-associated infections in acute care hospitals and generate updated estimates of the national burden of such infections. We defined health care-associated infections with the use of National Healthcare Safety Network criteria. One-day surveys of randomly selected inpatients were performed in participating hospitals. Hospital personnel collected demographic and limited clinical data. Trained data collectors reviewed medical records retrospectively to identify health care-associated infections active at the time of the survey. Survey data and 2010 Nationwide Inpatient Sample data, stratified according to patient age and length of hospital stay, were used to estimate the total numbers of health care-associated infections and of inpatients with such infections in U.S. acute care hospitals in 2011. Surveys were conducted in 183 hospitals. Of 11,282 patients, 452 had 1 or more health care-associated infections (4.0%; 95% confidence interval, 3.7 to 4.4). Of 504 such infections, the most common types were pneumonia (21.8%), surgical-site infections (21.8%), and gastrointestinal infections (17.1%). Clostridium difficile was the most commonly reported pathogen (causing 12.1% of health care-associated infections). Device-associated infections (i.e., central-catheter-associated bloodstream infection, catheter-associated urinary tract infection, and ventilator-associated pneumonia), which have traditionally been the focus of programs to prevent health care-associated infections, accounted for 25.6% of such infections. We estimated that there were 648,000 patients with 721,800 health care-associated infections in U.S. acute care hospitals in 2011. Results of this multistate prevalence survey of health care-associated infections indicate that public health surveillance and prevention activities should continue to address C. difficile infections. As device- and procedure-associated infections decrease, consideration should be given to expanding surveillance and prevention activities to include other health care-associated infections.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Management of Sepsis

            New England Journal of Medicine, 355(16), 1699-1713
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Infection with vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus containing the vanA resistance gene.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Braz J Infect Dis
                Braz J Infect Dis
                The Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases
                Elsevier
                1413-8670
                1678-4391
                13 March 2018
                Mar-Apr 2018
                13 March 2018
                : 22
                : 2
                : 99-105
                Affiliations
                [a ]UNESP - Univ Estadual Paulista, Instituto de Biociências de Botucatu, Departamento de Microbiologia e Imunologia, Botucatu, SP, Brazil
                [b ]UNESP - Univ Estadual Paulista, Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu, Hospital Universitário, Departamento de Doenças Tropicais, Botucatu, SP, Brazil
                [c ]UNESP - Univ Estadual Paulista, Instituto de Biociências de Botucatu, Departamento de Biociência, Botucatu, SP, Brazil
                [d ]UNESP - Univ Estadual Paulista, Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu, Hospital Universitário, Departamento de Medicina Interna, Botucatu, SP, Brazil
                Author notes
                [* ] Corresponding author. taisa_texrocchetti@ 123456hotmail.com
                Article
                S1413-8670(17)30950-9
                10.1016/j.bjid.2018.02.006
                9428231
                29548778
                97afc221-23a4-4d6f-bb12-385de2e41b1b
                © 2018 Sociedade Brasileira de Infectologia. Published by Elsevier Editora Ltda.

                This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

                History
                : 3 November 2017
                : 18 February 2018
                Categories
                Original Article

                staphylococcus spp.,staphylococcus aureus,mrsa,meca gene,blood cultures,multiplex pcr

                Comments

                Comment on this article