8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Prenatal Developmental Trajectories of Fluctuating Asymmetry in Bat Humeri

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Fluctuating asymmetry (random fluctuations between the left and right sides of the body) has been interpreted as an index to quantify both the developmental instabilities and homeostatic capabilities of organisms, linking the phenotypic and genotypic aspects of morphogenesis. However, studying the ontogenesis of fluctuating asymmetry has been limited to mostly model organisms in postnatal stages, missing prenatal trajectories of asymmetry that could better elucidate decoupled developmental pathways controlling symmetric bone elongation and thickening. In this study, we quantified the presence and magnitude of asymmetry during the prenatal development of bats, focusing on the humerus, a highly specialized bone adapted in bats to perform under multiple functional demands. We deconstructed levels of asymmetry by measuring the longitudinal and cross-sectional asymmetry of the humerus using a combination of linear measurements and geometric morphometrics. We tested the presence of different types of asymmetry and calculated the magnitude of size-controlled fluctuating asymmetry to assess developmental instability. Statistical support for the presence of fluctuating asymmetry was found for both longitudinal and cross-sectional asymmetry, explaining on average 16% of asymmetric variation. Significant directional asymmetry accounted for less than 6.6% of asymmetric variation. Both measures of fluctuating asymmetry remained relatively stable throughout ontogeny, but cross-sectional asymmetry was significantly different across developmental stages. Finally, we did not find a correspondence between developmental patterns of longitudinal and cross-sectional asymmetry, indicating that processes promoting symmetrical bone elongation and thickening work independently. We suggest various functional pressures linked to newborn bats’ ecology associated with longitudinal (altricial flight capabilities) and cross-sectional (precocial clinging ability) developmental asymmetry differentially. We hypothesize that stable magnitudes of fluctuating asymmetry across development could indicate the presence of developmental mechanisms buffering developmental instability.

          Related collections

          Most cited references65

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          geomorph: anrpackage for the collection and analysis of geometric morphometric shape data

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Developmental regulation of the growth plate.

            Vertebrates do not look like jellyfish because the bones of their skeletons are levers that allow movement and protect vital organs. Bones come in an enormous variety of shapes and sizes to accomplish these goals, but, with few exceptions, use one process--endochondral bone formation--to generate the skeleton. The past few years have seen an enormous increase in understanding of the signalling pathways and the transcription factors that control endochondral bone development.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              A model for development and evolution of complex morphological structures.

              How 'complex' or composite morphological structures like the mammalian craniomandibular region arise during development and how they are altered during evolution are two major unresolved questions in biology. Herein, we have described a model for the development and evolution of complex morphological structures. The model assumes that natural selection acts upon an array of phenotypes generated by variation in a variety of underlying genetic and epigenetic controlling factors. Selection refines the integration of the various morphogenetic components during ontogeny in order to produce a functioning structure and to adapt the organisms to differing patterns of environmental heterogeneity. The model was applied to the development and evolution of the mammalian mandible (which is used as a paradigm of complex morphological structures). The embryology of the mandible was examined in detail in order to identify the fundamental developmental units which are necessary to assemble the final morphological structure. The model is quite general since equivalent units exist for the development of many other biological structures. This model could be applied to many other developing morphological structures as well as other groups of organisms. For example, it can be applied to cell parameters during Drosophila development (Atchley, 1987). The model as discussed in this paper assumes that morphological changes in the mandible result from evolutionary changes in its underlying developmental units. The developmental units relate to characteristics of cellular condensations which are produced from the differentiation of embryonic neural crest cells. The developmental units include: the number of stem cells in preskeletal condensations (n), the time of initiation of condensation formation (t), the fraction of cells that is mitotically active within a condensation (f), the rate of division of these cells (r), and their rate of cell death (d). These units and their derivative structures are discussed in terms of types of tissue differentiation (chondrogenesis, osteogenesis, primary/secondary osteogenesis, intramembranous/endochondral ossification) and growth properties of major morphological regions of the mandible. Variation in these five units provides the developmental basis for ontogenetic and phylogenetic modification of mandibular morphology. We have discussed how these developmental units are influenced by (a) the cell lineage from which they arise, (b) epithelial-mesenchymal (inductive tissue) interactions, (c) regulation of cell differentiation, and (d) extrinsic factors such as muscles, teeth and hormones. Evidence was provided that variation in mandibular morphology is heritable, subject to modification by natural selection, and that divergence among different genetic stocks has apparently occurred through changes in these developmental units and their derivative structures.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Cell Dev Biol
                Front Cell Dev Biol
                Front. Cell Dev. Biol.
                Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                2296-634X
                26 May 2021
                2021
                : 9
                : 639522
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Department of Anthropology, University of Toronto Scarborough , Toronto, ON, Canada
                [2] 2Earth and Sustainability Science Research Centre, School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales , Sydney, NSW, Australia
                [3] 3Jockey Club College of Veterinary Medicine and Life Sciences, City University of Hong Kong , Kowloon, Hong Kong
                [4] 4Research and Development Center for Precision Medicine, University of Tsukuba , Tsukuba, Japan
                [5] 5Institute of Ecology and Biological Resources, Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology , Hanoi, Vietnam
                [6] 6Graduate University of Science and Technology, Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology , Hanoi, Vietnam
                [7] 7School of Archaeology and Anthropology, The Australian National University , Canberra, ACT, Australia
                Author notes

                Edited by: Juan Pascual-Anaya, Malaga University, Spain

                Reviewed by: Shin-ichi Fujiwara, Nagoya University, Japan; Benedikt Hallgrimsson, University of Calgary, Canada

                *Correspondence: Camilo López-Aguirre, c.lopezaguirre@ 123456utoronto.ca

                This article was submitted to Evolutionary Developmental Biology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology

                Article
                10.3389/fcell.2021.639522
                8187808
                97c94d04-a2be-446d-b7a1-da462c2d7a4b
                Copyright © 2021 López-Aguirre, Hand, Koyabu, Tu and Wilson.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 09 December 2020
                : 14 April 2021
                Page count
                Figures: 5, Tables: 3, Equations: 1, References: 65, Pages: 11, Words: 0
                Funding
                Funded by: City University of Hong Kong 10.13039/100007567
                Award ID: 9610466
                Funded by: Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 10.13039/501100001691
                Award ID: 18H04816
                Award ID: 18H02492
                Award ID: 18K19359
                Award ID: 18KK0207
                Funded by: Australian Research Council 10.13039/501100000923
                Award ID: FT200100822
                Categories
                Cell and Developmental Biology
                Original Research

                fluctuating asymmetry,chiroptera,prenatal development,humerus,morphogenesis

                Comments

                Comment on this article