16
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Safe Introduction of Ancillary Trocars

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The authors describe 2 steps useful to avoid iatrogenic injury during introduction of laparoscopic ancillary trocars.

          Abstract

          The problem of laparoscopic entry is currently still unsolved, and despite the various techniques adopted by the surgical community, it has not yet been determined which is the correct access in all patients. Add to this the problem of safe ancillary port introduction; all surgeons must avoid vascular and visceral damage. The 2 most common problems with second port trocars are inferior and superior epigastric artery damage, and bowel loops and adhesions. Over the years, we have developed 2 steps that are very useful to avoid iatrogenic injuries to vessels and viscera. In this brief report, we explain the following 2 simple steps, called by the authors “yellow island” port entry and second trocar “tip entry guided” by a suction cannula. In our practice of more than 3400 conventional laparoscopies, with data from patients with different characteristics, surgeons who have introduced laparoscopic surgery into their daily practice might teach these steps to young fellows and trainees.

          Related collections

          Most cited references14

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Laparoscopic entry: a review of techniques, technologies, and complications.

          To provide clinical direction, based on the best evidence available, on laparoscopic entry techniques and technologies and their associated complications. The laparoscopic entry techniques and technologies reviewed in formulating this guideline include the classic pneumoperitoneum (Veress/trocar), the open (Hasson), the direct trocar insertion, the use of disposable shielded trocars, radially expanding trocars, and visual entry systems. Implementation of this guideline should optimize the decision-making process in choosing a particular technique to enter the abdomen during laparoscopy. English-language articles from Medline, PubMed, and the Cochrane Database published before the end of September 2005 were searched, using the key words laparoscopic entry, laparoscopy access, pneumoperitoneum, Veress needle, open (Hasson), direct trocar, visual entry, shielded trocars, radially expanded trocars, and laparoscopic complications. The quality of evidence was rated using the criteria described in the Report of the Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination. RECOMMENDATIONS AND SUMMARY STATEMENT: 1. Left upper quadrant (LUQ, Palmer's) laparoscopic entry should be considered in patients with suspected or known periumbilical adhesions or history or presence of umbilical hernia, or after three failed insufflation attempts at the umbilicus. (II-2 A) Other sites of insertion, such as transuterine Veress CO(2) insufflation, may be considered if the umbilical and LUQ insertions have failed or have been considered and are not an option. (I-A) 2. The various Veress needle safety tests or checks provide very little useful information on the placement of the Veress needle. It is therefore not necessary to perform various safety checks on inserting the Veress needle; however, waggling of the Veress needle from side to side must be avoided, as this can enlarge a 1.6 mm puncture injury to an injury of up to 1 cm in viscera or blood vessels. (II-1 A) 3. The Veress intraperitoneal (VIP-pressure
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Safety zones for anterior abdominal wall entry during laparoscopy: a CT scan mapping of epigastric vessels.

            To determine the efficacy of CT scan in mapping the superior and inferior epigastric vessels, relative to landmarks apparent at laparoscopy. Trauma to abdominal wall blood vessels occurs in 0.2% to 2% of laparoscopic procedures. Both superficial and deep abdominal wall vessels are at risk. The superficial vessels may be located by transillumination; however, the deep epigastric vessels cannot be effectively located by transillumination and, thus, other techniques should be used to minimize the risk of injury to these vessels. Abdominal and pelvic CT images of 100 patients were studied. The location of the superior and inferior epigastric vessels from the midline were determined at five levels, correlated with each other and with the patient age, body mass index, and history of midline laparotomy using Pearson's correlation coefficient and multivariate analysis. CT scan was successful in mapping the epigastric vessels in 95% of patients. At the xiphoid process level, the superior epigastric vessels (SEA) were 4.41 +/- 0.13 cm from the midline on the right and 4.53 +/- 0.14 cm on the left. Midway between xiphoid and umbilicus, the SEA were 5.50 +/- 0.16 cm on the right of the midline and 5.36 +/- 0.16 cm on the left. At the umbilicus, the epigastric vessels were 5.88 +/- 0.14 cm on the right and 5.55 +/- 0.13 on the left of the midline. Midway between the umbilicus and symphysis pubis, the inferior epigastric (IEA) were 5.32 +/- 0.12 cm on right and 5.25 +/- 0.11 cm on the left. At the symphysis pubis, the IEA were 7.47 +/- 0.10 cm on the right and 7.49 +/- 0.09 cm away from the midline on the left side. Epigastric vessels are usually located in the area between 4 and 8 cm from the midline. Staying away from this area will determine the safe zone of entry of the anterior abdominal wall.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Recognition and management of major vessel injury during laparoscopy.

              Laparoscopy is one of the most commonly performed procedures in the United States. Injury to a major retroperitoneal vessel occurs in 0.3% to 1.0% of procedures, most commonly during laparoscopic entry while placing the Veress needle or primary trocar. Fatal outcome can be related to massive gas embolism or exsanguination. Recommended treatment for gas embolism can range from supportive measures to external chest compression and insertion of a central line to withdraw gas from the right side of the heart. Recommended treatment of major vessel injury with massive hemorrhage consists of rapid laparotomy and control of hemorrhage using direct pressure until a surgeon experienced in vascular procedures arrives. When a major vessel injury occurs in a surgical facility distant from a medical center and without an available surgeon with vascular experience, based on the trauma literature, we recommend temporary control of blood loss using abdominal packing and closure (i.e., "damage control surgery") and judicious resuscitation (i.e., "damage control resuscitation") before transportation to a medical center. Copyright © 2010 AAGL. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Vito Fazzi Hospital, Lecce, Italy.
                Unit of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Santa Maria delle Grazie Hospital, Pozzuoli (Na), Italy.
                Unit of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Santa Maria delle Grazie Hospital, Pozzuoli (Na), Italy.
                Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Santa Maria Hospital, Bari, Italy.
                The Mount Sinai Hospital of Queens, Long Island City, New York, USA.
                Universidad Autonoma de Mexico, Facultad de Estudios Superiores. Iztacala, Mexico.
                Fundación Hospitalaria. Buenos Aires, Argentina.
                Professor Emeritus, Kiel School of Gynaecological Endoscopy, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospitals Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany.
                Professor Emeritus, University of Miami School of Medicine, FL, USA and; Chairman, Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons (SLS).
                Journal
                JSLS
                JSLS
                jsls
                jsls
                JSLS
                JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
                Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons (Miami, FL )
                1086-8089
                1938-3797
                Apr-Jun 2012
                : 16
                : 2
                : 276-279
                Affiliations
                Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Vito Fazzi Hospital, Lecce, Italy.
                Unit of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Santa Maria delle Grazie Hospital, Pozzuoli (Na), Italy.
                Unit of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Santa Maria delle Grazie Hospital, Pozzuoli (Na), Italy.
                Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Santa Maria Hospital, Bari, Italy.
                The Mount Sinai Hospital of Queens, Long Island City, New York, USA.
                Universidad Autonoma de Mexico, Facultad de Estudios Superiores. Iztacala, Mexico.
                Fundación Hospitalaria. Buenos Aires, Argentina.
                Professor Emeritus, Kiel School of Gynaecological Endoscopy, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospitals Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany.
                Professor Emeritus, University of Miami School of Medicine, FL, USA and; Chairman, Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons (SLS).
                Author notes

                This paper is dedicated to a special man and skilled doctor, Dr. Pietro Lupo we miss you so much and you will always be in our hearts.

                Address correspondence to: Dr. Andrea Tinelli, MD, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Experimental Endoscopic Surgery, Imaging, Technology and Minimally Invasive Therapy of Centre for Interdisciplinary Research Applied to Medicine (CRIAM), Vito Fazzi Hospital, Piazza Muratore, 73100 Lecce, Italy. Telephone: +39/339/2074078, Fax: +39/0832/661511, E-mail: andreatinelli@ 123456gmail.com
                Article
                11-08-121
                10.4293/108680812X13427982376464
                3481235
                97ca1456-4329-48a3-91bc-602b5f6ab143
                © 2012 by JSLS, Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/), which permits for noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not altered in any way.

                History
                Categories
                Scientific Papers

                Surgery
                minimally invasive surgery,complications,second port trocars,ancillary trocars,trocar associated injuries,first access,epigastric artery,vascular trauma,iatrogenic injury,vessel injury,laparoscopic entry,laparoscopy

                Comments

                Comment on this article