3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Virtual Reality as an Adjunctive Non-pharmacological Therapy to Reduce Pain in School-Aged Children With Burn Wounds

      , , , ,
      Journal of Burn Care & Research
      Oxford University Press (OUP)

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          This paper explores the effectiveness of virtual reality in reducing pain in school-aged children undergoing burn wound care. From June 2020 to September 2021, 34 cases of burned children treated in the burn clinic of a hospital were selected. A before- and after-study design was utilized to observe the first and second wound dressing changes of the same patients. The two dressing changes were randomly selected for the VR plan and the Non-VR plan. In VR Plan, patients played virtual reality games using a headset and gamepad to distract from their pain. To determine the effectiveness of VR, the children’s pain score, heart rate, blood oxygen saturation, and adverse reactions such as dizziness and nausea were recorded ten minutes before wound dressing change, during wound dressing change and ten minutes after the bandages was on. The Wong-Baker and FLACC scores of the patients in the VR group were (5.79 ± 1.84) and (4.91 ± 2.08), respectively, whereas the scores of the patients in the non-VR group were (5.47 ± 1.99) and (4.91 ± 2.25), respectively, 10 minutes before wound dressing changes. During wound dressing changes, the Wong-Baker and FLACC scores of patients in the VR group were (3.78 ± 1.49) and (2.73 ± 1.38), respectively, whereas the scores of patients in the non-VR group were (5.58 ± 2.48) and (4.97 ± 2.39), respectively. After wound dressing changes, the Wong-Baker and FLACC scores of patients in the VR group were (2.44 ± 1.65) and (2.12 ± 1.34), respectively, and the scores of patients in the non-VR group were (4.21 ± 2.42) and (3.75 ± 2.05), respectively. The study concludes that virtual reality is effective in reducing pain in school-aged children with burn wounds. The study also concludes that virtual reality does not cause adverse reactions.

          Related collections

          Most cited references22

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Pain Mechanisms: A New Theory

            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The FLACC: a behavioral scale for scoring postoperative pain in young children.

            To evaluate the reliability and validity of the FLACC Pain Assessment Tool which incorporates five categories of pain behaviors: facial expression; leg movement; activity; cry; and consolability. Eighty-nine children aged 2 months to 7 years, (3.0 +/- 2.0 yrs.) who had undergone a variety of surgical procedures, were observed in the Post Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU). The study consisted of: 1) measuring interrater reliability; 2) testing validity by measuring changes in FLACC scores in response to administration of analgesics; and 3) comparing FLACC scores to other pain ratings. The FLACC tool was found to have high interrater reliability. Preliminary evidence of validity was provided by the significant decrease in FLACC scores related to administration of analgesics. Validity was also supported by the correlation with scores assigned by the Objective Pain Scale (OPS) and nurses' global ratings of pain. The FLACC provides a simple framework for quantifying pain behaviors in children who may not be able to verbalize the presence or severity of pain. Our preliminary data indicates the FLACC pain assessment tool is valid and reliable.
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Virtual reality as an analgesic for acute and chronic pain in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis

              Background: Previous studies have shown that virtual reality (VR) is effective in reducing acute and chronic pain both in adults and in children. Given the emergence of new VR technology, and the growing body of research surrounding VR and pain management, an updated systematic review is warranted. Purpose: The purpose of this systematic review is to compare the effectiveness of VR in reducing acute and chronic pain in adults. Data Sources: A search was conducted in three databases (PubMed, CINAHL, Trip) using standardized search terms. Study Selection: Twenty experimental and quasi-experimental trials published between January 2007 and December 2018 were included based on prespecified inclusion and exclusion criteria. Pain intensity was the primary outcome. Data Extraction: We extracted data and appraised the quality of articles using either the PEDro or Modified Downs and Black risk of bias tools. Data Synthesis: The majority of studies supported the use of VR to reduce acute pain both during the procedure and immediately after. Numerous studies found VR reduced chronic pain during VR exposure but there is insufficient evidence to support lasting analgesia. There was considerable variability in patient population, pain condition and dosage of VR exposure. Limitations: Due to heterogeneity, we were unable to perform meta-analyses for all study populations and pain conditions. Conclusions: VR is an effective treatment for reducing acute pain. There is some research that suggests VR can reduce chronic pain during the intervention; however, more evidence is needed to conclude that VR is effective for lasting reductions in chronic pain.

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Journal of Burn Care & Research
                Oxford University Press (OUP)
                1559-047X
                1559-0488
                July 01 2023
                July 05 2023
                October 01 2022
                July 01 2023
                July 05 2023
                October 01 2022
                : 44
                : 4
                : 832-836
                Article
                10.1093/jbcr/irac149
                36181672
                97d03382-c2e4-4916-bb7a-dd5b6f700cc0
                © 2022

                https://academic.oup.com/pages/standard-publication-reuse-rights

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                Related Documents Log