46
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      Publish your biodiversity research with us!

      Submit your article here.

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Typification of 23 names in Eriobotrya (Maleae, Rosaceae)

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          As part of a comprehensive systematic study on the genus Eriobotrya and its close relatives from the E & SE Asia, new typifications of 23 names are presented here, along with some nomenclatural notes of the names involved. We lectotypified 22 names including accepted names and synonyms. They are: E. acuminatissima , E. bengalensis var. angustifolia ; E. bengalensis f. intermedia , E. brackloi , E. brackloi var. atrichophylla , E. elliptica var. petelotii , E. fragrans var. furfuracea , E. glabrescens , E. grandiflora , E. henryi , E. oblongifolia , E. petiolata , E. platyphylla , E. poilanei , E. prinoides , E. prinoides var. laotica , E. salwinensis , E. serrata , E. stipularis , Hiptage cavaleriei , Photinia longifolia , Symplocos seguinii . One neotype of Photinia dubia was also proposed in this study, and E. pseudoraphiolepis and Mespilus cuila were identified as superfluous names. In addition, we also summarized the typification of 18 names for taxonomic reference: E. angustissima , E. balgooyi , E. condaoensis , E. × daduheensis , E. elliptica , E. fulvicoma , E. fragrans , E. glabrescens var. victoriensis , E. hookeriana , E. latifolia , E. obovata , E. malipoensis , E. merguiensis , E. tengyuehensis , E. wardii , Mespilus bengalensis , Photinia deflexa , and M. japonica .

          Related collections

          Most cited references35

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Book: not found

          International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Expanded phylogenetic and dating analyses of the apples and their relatives (Pyreae, Rosaceae).

            Despite previous efforts to elucidate relationships within the Pyreae (Rosaceae), relationships among the major sub-lineages, generic limits, and divergence times have remained uncertain. The present study greatly expands phylogenetic analyses of the Pyreae by using a combination of 11 chloroplast regions plus nuclear ribosomal ITS sequences from 486 individuals representing 331 species and 27 genera. Maximum likelihood and bayesian analyses generally support existing generic boundary, although Sorbus, as previously circumscribed, is clearly non-monophyletic. Two significant conflicts were detected between the chloroplast and ITS phylogenies, suggesting that hybridization played a role in the origins of Micromeles and Pseudocydonia. In addition, we provide estimates of the divergence times of the major lineages. Our findings support the view that the major Pyreae lineages were established during the Eocene-Oligocene period, but that most of the modern diversity did not originate until the Miocene. At least five major, early Old World-New World disjunctions were detected and these vicariance events are generally most consistent with movement through the Beringia. Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Holotype specimens and type citations: General issues

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                PhytoKeys
                PhytoKeys
                3
                urn:lsid:arphahub.com:pub:F7FCE910-8E78-573F-9C77-7788555F8AAD
                PhytoKeys
                Pensoft Publishers
                1314-2011
                1314-2003
                2020
                04 February 2020
                : 139
                : 99-118
                Affiliations
                [1 ] State Key Laboratory of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100093, China Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing China
                [2 ] Department of Botany, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, PO Box 37012, Washington, DC 20013-7012, USA National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution Washington United States of America
                [3 ] College of Architecture and Urban Planning, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China Tongji University Shanghai China
                Author notes
                Corresponding author: Jun Wen ( WENJ@ 123456si.edu )

                Academic editor: H. Schaefer

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0297-7531
                Article
                47967
                10.3897/phytokeys.139.47967
                7012954
                32089637
                97d0a8e5-f5dc-4517-9978-c72d76feaab6

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC0 Public Domain Dedication.

                History
                : 02 November 2019
                : 17 January 2020
                Funding
                National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution
                Categories
                Research Article
                Rosaceae
                Taxonomy
                Asia

                Plant science & Botany
                integrative systematics,lectotype,loquat,neotype,nomenclature, pyrus , rhaphiolepis ,taxonomy

                Comments

                Comment on this article