12
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Predictors of acute and long-term success of slow pathway ablation for atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia: a single center series of 1,419 consecutive patients.

      Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology
      Adult, Aged, Atrioventricular Block, etiology, Atrioventricular Node, physiopathology, surgery, Catheter Ablation, adverse effects, methods, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Incidence, Isoproterenol, diagnostic use, Male, Middle Aged, Pacemaker, Artificial, Recurrence, Retrospective Studies, Sex Factors, Tachycardia, Atrioventricular Nodal Reentry, Treatment Outcome

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) is the most common mechanism of supraventricular tachycardia. Slow pathway (SP) ablation is the first-line treatment approach with a high acute success rate and a low risk of inadvertent complete atrioventricular (AV) block. However, there is still some uncertainty as to the most appropriate procedural endpoints and the impact of these on risk of recurrence. We report the acute and long-term results of SP ablation in a large single-center consecutive series and analyze predictors of acute success and late recurrence. The study included 1,448 consecutive procedures in 1,419 patients with AVNRT (mean age 49 ± 17 years, 66% women) who underwent SP ablation using a combined electrophysiologic and anatomic approach. Univariate and multivariate analysis was performed for potential predictors of acute success and late recurrence. Acute success was achieved in 98.1%. Transient (first, second, or third degree) AV block occurred during the procedure in 20 (1.41%) patients. One patient (0.07%) had persistent first-degree and transient second-degree AV block after ablation and underwent pacemaker implant at day 21. Of the 1,391 patients with successful ablation, 22 patients (1.5%) developed AVNRT recurrence during a follow-up period of 63 ± 38 months. The only independent predictor of reduced procedural success was the presence of atypical AVNRT (hazard ratio 3.1, P = 0.04). Independent predictors of AVNRT recurrence were age <20 years and female gender (hazard ratios 14.1 and 3.7, respectively). No significant difference in the incidence of late recurrence was observed in patients with or without residual slow-pathway conduction, or according to use of isoproterenol testing or general anesthesia. However, patients with a single echo with recurrence had a significantly larger echo window (median 85 ms) than those without (median 30 ms, P = 0.01). This study demonstrates in a large consecutive single-center series that SP ablation using radiofrequency energy is a highly effective procedure with an extremely low risk of inadvertent AV block and a low recurrence rate. We found that single-AV nodal echo beats represented a procedural endpoint that did not predict AVNRT recurrence but that a large echo window is associated with recurrence. Recurrence rates in this series were higher in young women, possibly reflecting a more conservative approach to ablation in this age group. ©2011, The Authors. Journal compilation ©2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Comments

          Comment on this article